When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am the owner of what I call "A Gas Guzzler" here's my story:
I own a 1999 F-150XL 4X4 which is still under factory warranty, it has very low mileage on it. Realizing that it's a truck, I'm not expecting great gas mileage, I don't tow and most of my trips are highway. I usually drive between 55-60 mph and I have only been getting 14-16 mpg, I took it back to the dealership, and they said it was sluggish and they replaced the oxygen sensor, spark plugs and two sensors that regulate air and fuel mixture, they assured me after the repairs were done and road tested, they were getting between 18-24 mpg, I thought my problems were solved, since getting the truck back, and using it for a week Im still getting roughly 16mpg. The truck has the 4.2 v6 engine , I'm pleased with the amount of power it has but I am very disappointed with fuel mileage, if anyone can relate to this or can tell me if this is the best mileage I will get please give me your input.
I also experience poor gas milage with my 97 F150.I think it has plenty of power, I guess the five speed helps a bunch but having the 4.2L I expected it to get better milage than 14.4 mpg.I installed a K&N air filter and dual exhaust , replaced the T.P.S sensor , new coil pack , plugs and wires , I still get the same milage and I too have a black soot at the end of my exhaust tips.
I just wanted to add my two cents if anyone is still following this thread. I bought a used 1997 Ford F150 XL with the 4.2L V-6. I was a bit astounded by the poor gas mileage. This is a standard cab with the long bed. Love the truck, but the gas mileage is terrible. I found this website by entering FORD+GAS+MILEAGE+4.2L. I was very surprised to find the thread. Anyhow, my experience pretty much matches everyone else's. Poor mileage (for a six) and black exhaust deposits. I previously owned an '88 Dodge Caravan SE with the 3.0 L V-6. This was a real hauler, believe it or not, kids, boats, trailers, you name it and it didn't use a lot a gas. I could haul full sheets of plywood with the seats out. Sometimes I kind of miss it. Gonna try a topper on the Ford to improve the aerodynamics (and security for my tools) but I doubt this will improve the mileage much. Anyhow, that's my say. Hope there is an answer somewhere. Later.
I also belatedly have an opinion. I feel the same apparently lots of 4.2 's are out there. The thing that pisses me off is there is no mileage advantage to the v6 over v8 none. I would put up with less power if it saved gas why it does not I don't know. I could understand if the v6 was so underpowered for size of truck that you had to floor it most of time but that is not case I have reg cab NO 4wd truck only has 150 lb tools, I get around 16 half freeway half country roads, pretty poor. Dakota 1996 4x2 ext cab got same mileage
>I just wanted to add my two cents if anyone is still
>following this thread. I bought a used 1997 Ford F150 XL
>with the 4.2L V-6. I was a bit astounded by the poor gas
>mileage. This is a standard cab with the long bed. Love the
>truck, but the gas mileage is terrible. I found this website
>by entering FORD+GAS+MILEAGE+4.2L. I was very surprised to
>find the thread. Anyhow, my experience pretty much matches
>everyone else's. Poor mileage (for a six) and black exhaust
>deposits. I previously owned an '88 Dodge Caravan SE with
>the 3.0 L V-6. This was a real hauler, believe it or not,
>kids, boats, trailers, you name it and it didn't use a lot a
>gas. I could haul full sheets of plywood with the seats out.
>Sometimes I kind of miss it. Gonna try a topper on the Ford
>to improve the aerodynamics (and security for my tools) but
>I doubt this will improve the mileage much. Anyhow, that's
>my say. Hope there is an answer somewhere. Later.
I hate to hear about all the gripes about the 4.2L and its gas milage. I just bought a 2002 F-150 Regular Cab SB 4x4 with the 4.2L and the 5 speed with 3.55 gears and 255/70 tires. Immediately after I bought the truck, I got 19 mpg (US) and I was quite impressed as I was new to driving a standard full time, I wasn't expecting such good milage. Since that time I let some air out of the tires, only a few pounds, and have done mostly city driving and have gotten anywhere from 15-17 mpg. Personally, I am not displeased with this motor, it is very peppy, and I have found quite a few upgrades for it, it takes some searching but they are out there. I think letting the small amount of air out of my tires did hurt my milage a bit, I have heard that on the '99 and up models, tire diameter makes a huge difference in how the truck responds, milage and performance wise. Good luck finding a 'solution.'
BigMrK
PS.. Ryanstruck, there are newer Chevy motors than the 350 (5.7L)
Yeah, I know there are newer engines, like the I6, if that's what you're referring to. But I would think that in a 1999 Chevy Tahoe, the 350 Vortec is standard, and though the 350 has been around for a long time, Vortec is a newer company to produce the engines, and to date the 350 is still the standard size engine in the Tahoes, Yiukons and Suburbans.
>I am the owner of what I call "A Gas Guzzler" here's my
>story:
>
>I own a 1999 F-150XL 4X4 which is still under factory
>warranty, it has very low mileage on it. Realizing that
>it's a truck, I'm not expecting great gas mileage, I don't
>tow and most of my trips are highway. I usually drive
>between 55-60 mph and I have only been getting 14-16 mpg, I
>took it back to the dealership, and they said it was
>sluggish and they replaced the oxygen sensor, spark plugs
>and two sensors that regulate air and fuel mixture, they
>assured me after the repairs were done and road tested, they
>were getting between 18-24 mpg, I thought my problems were
>solved, since getting the truck back, and using it for a
>week Im still getting roughly 16mpg. The truck has the 4.2
>v6 engine , I'm pleased with the amount of power it has but
>I am very disappointed with fuel mileage, if anyone can
>relate to this or can tell me if this is the best mileage I
>will get please give me your input.
I have a new F150 4.2 and it has 1400 miles on it. So far the fuel mileage is between 15-17 locally. Haven't been on the highway yet. From all that I have read, thats all I can expect from it.
Wow, this topic never dies !! I am always suprised at the w-i-d-e varations from individual to individual and truck to truck. But anyways...some more grist for the mill. My truck: 2000 F150 4.2L 3.55 rear end, 255/70 tires. 53,500 miles, Bought new. 2 years old this month. No Bed cover, shell, etc. But usually run tailgate down for long Interstate trips.
Best ever; 21 mpg. Worst ever; about 17 mpg. These are Interstate numbers. Combined city/Interstate will average about 17-18. Never checked "all city" but suspect it is around 15-16 mpg. I have driven enough Interstate miles to figure this out: on flat to slightly hilly terrain: 65 mph gives me about 20-21 mpg. 70 mph gives about 19-20 mpg. 75 mph gives about 18-19 mpg. 80-85 mph gives about 17 mpg. These are "ball park" numbers but actual numbers never differ from them by more than 1/2 to 1 mpg.
Just today I got some of the worst ever mileage for Interstate travel since I have got the truck; about 250 miles averaging 80-82 mph got me 17.3 mpg.
Brian
Wow! This has got to be one of the longest running threads I think I've ever seen.
I'm relatively new to this forum, so go easy on me here, but in my exerience, the type of gas you run affects milage. I ran midgrade for the first year ('99 F150,) then switched to 89 octane when the gas hit $1.60 something. I noticed decreased milage, down to 16-17 from almost 20mpg new on the interstate, and driving almost 1000 miles a week (steel salesman out of NC,) I could feel it in the pocket. I too noticed a buildup of soot/sludge/something on the tailpipe tips. Switched back to mid-grade on a test basis, milage went up to around 19-20. I got brave and ran a 2000 mile swing through Louisiana on 93 Amoco, and got 21.5, with the tailgate UP!, and no bed cover. I went back to mid, either Marathon, BP or Citgo, and still get between 18-19 on 92k, ready for a tune-up to try and fix that. Still much better than the '78 460 F250 in the barn.
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 14-Feb-02 AT 05:34 PM (EST)]I own a 94 F-150 Super Cab Short Bed 4X4 Automatic. It has 5.8L V8 with 109,000 miles on it. I recently put on new plugs, wires, cap, rotor, air filter, and it still only get about 11mpg. I drive it good. I always put the higher octane gas in it. 89. What can I do to improve my MPG. Anybody have any thoughts????????
I just had a pickup identical to yours but it was a 96 model, I know there were some differences, but basically the same. I had a JET chip, high flow cat converter, dual glasspacks, K&N Air Filter, and Bosch 4 point platinum spark plugs with a lower temp thermostat and I got 14 mpg one time that I remember. Typically I ran 86 or 88 octane and I got nearly 13 mpg consistently, didn't matter if it was highway miles or city miles. They're great trucks, hang on to it, mine had 149,000 miles on it when I traded.
2000 XLT 2wd,5 speed,3.55's and stock 16 inch ties.Average mileage(40% town/60% highway) 16.5.But I drive 70-80 mph on highway.If there's one thing I've found it's that sometimes people will over estimate their mileage or stretch the truth a bit.14-16 doesn't seem to bad given it's a 4x4.I had a Nissan 4x4 once and only got 16 mpg.Now if you want mileage get a diesel,cant wait for ford to put the 6 cylinder powerstroke in a 1/2 ton truck.As far as chevy guys,you know they lie :P
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.