When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That's such a totally invalid response. They DO blow plugs - even when replaced correctly. If you only drive two blocks in any single direction, you can always walk home and have a tow-truck bring your paper-weight. Meanwhile, you've still got seven more plugs that you can blow. It's a bad design and Ford does Not care.
That's such a totally invalid response. They DO blow plugs - even when replaced correctly.
Invalid response? Less than 1% of 4.6s or 5.4s will ever spit out plugs when the plugs are changed before 70,000 miles, when the plugs are changed only when the engine is stone cold, and when the plugs are torqued to 10 ft.-lbs. It's really pretty simple. Blowing a plug in a properly maintained 4.6/5.4 is no more likely than a 4.2 developing crank/bearing problems. The difference is one is fixed for less than $50, the other requires a total rebuild. With the 4.2L even when it is at 100% it's still down 30 horsepower and 40 lb.-ft. to the 4.6L, runs about as smoothly as a 3-cylinder John Deere diesel tractor engine and gets no better real world fuel economy than the 4.6L. Other than initial cost, there is no advantage to the 4.2L over the 4.6L. None.
If you only drive two blocks in any single direction, you can always walk home and have a tow-truck bring your paper-weight. Meanwhile, you've still got seven more plugs that you can blow. It's a bad design and Ford does Not care.
Ford fixed the problem in the 2004-up 2V cylinder heads.
Yeah, you better change out those plugs or you could end up spitting out a plug before 100,000 miles.
From a percentage standpoint it's pretty unlikely that your 4.6/5.4 will ever spit out a plug and virtually none ever will when you do what I said above. Still, the reality is that you have a steel spark plug secured in an aluminum head by 4 threads per plug. Ford's biggest mistake with these engines was the recommended 100,000 mile spark plug intervals, it should have been no more than 50,000 miles IMO.
Why play with fire? Change out those plugs, grafekie!
BB,I knew the 97s and some 98s (4.2) had crank problems.After that the 4.2s had no more mechanical problems.Can you please post any information on the 4.2 cranks going bad?I'm very interested in this!
My Ford tech friend,who also drives an 04 4.2 F150,usually on average,repairs a 4.6 or 5.4 blown plug engine 4-6 times a week!
And,the repair cost can be anywhere from $1200 to $4000! For that price you can get a new crank kit on a 4.2,installed, to a good used 4.2 or a new one too!
And,i'll continue to say it;the 4.6 is a good small V8.I have one in my 99 Lincoln Town car.A bit underpowered for me,but it will do.
If you are going to hold out for one with a V8, you might as well hold out for one with a 5.4L.
Why would you want a 4.6L when a 5.4L makes more power and gets the same milage?
Not everyone needs or even really wants a V8. In a couple years Im looking to upgrade to a newer F-150 and I will be looking for a good used 2-3 year old reg cab 4x2 XL with a V6. All I ever haul is my snowmobile and a bedload of firewood and the 4.2L has plenty of ooomph for hauling that. Nothing against the 4.6L, its just that I can get one with a 4.2L for considerably less money and the 4.2L will be easier to work on.
If I were interested in one with a V8, I definetely wouldnt settle for anything less than a 5.4L though.
My Ford tech friend,who also drives an 04 4.2 F150,usually on average,repairs a 4.6 or 5.4 blown plug engine 4-6 times a week!
I have to call BS on this one. I worked at a Ford dealer for a little while, and my best friend is a Ford Senior Master Tech currently working at a Ford dealership. At the largest Ford dealer in the area I would see a Modular V8 with a spit spark plug once every couple months, sometimes one or two a month at the MAXIMUM. Also, 9 times out of 10 it was either a s/c Lightning or H/D with an aftermarket tune (and likely too much timing) or a higher mileage engine on the original plugs.
4-6 per week is nothing but a blatant bold faced lie. Maybe 4-6 one week when all of the planets aligned on a 50-year blue moon.
If you are going to hold out for one with a V8, you might as well hold out for one with a 5.4L.
Why would you want a 4.6L when a 5.4L makes more power and gets the same milage?
Not everyone needs or even really wants a V8. In a couple years Im looking to upgrade to a newer F-150 and I will be looking for a good used 2-3 year old reg cab 4x2 XL with a V6. All I ever haul is my snowmobile and a bedload of firewood and the 4.2L has plenty of ooomph for hauling that. Nothing against the 4.6L, its just that I can get one with a 4.2L for considerably less money and the 4.2L will be easier to work on.
If I were interested in one with a V8, I definetely wouldnt settle for anything less than a 5.4L though.
4.6 >>> 4.2 in virtually every way. I would prefer a 5.4L as well, but the 4.6L does get a little better mileage, is less likely to spit out a plug, is a bit easier to work on and doesn't feel like it has a cam made out of sandpaper like the 4.2L does.
I have to call BS on this one. I worked at a Ford dealer for a little while, and my best friend is a Ford Senior Master Tech currently working at a Ford dealership. At the largest Ford dealer in the area I would see a Modular V8 with a spit spark plug once every couple months, sometimes one or two a month at the MAXIMUM. Also, 9 times out of 10 it was either a s/c Lightning or H/D with an aftermarket tune (and likely too much timing) or a higher mileage engine on the original plugs.
4-6 per week is nothing but a blatant bold faced lie. Maybe 4-6 one week when all of the planets aligned on a 50-year blue moon.
I just go by what he tells me.And,I was in there one time and saw 2 F150s and 1 F350 with there cabs in the air! Why? Heads were being replaced due to spit out plugs! Maybe "uranus" was lined up with the planets?
Personally,I think you just flat out don't like the 4.2,for personal reasons maybe,I dont know.But after its take off in 97 it has come along way.
BTW,I still dont see those postings of the cranks going bad.I think you made that up!
I wonder how many of you that are completely trashing the 4.2 have actually owned one? My experience has been great. I would own another. Absolutely the only thing you might give up is the V8 sound. The debate over the failures are rediculous. Most engines never experience these premaure failures. They are both good engines. My 4.2 is very smooth and reliable. Why scare someone off from a good deal if you do not have any experience with the product you are trashing?
I just go by what he tells me.And,I was in there one time and saw 2 F150s and 1 F350 with there cabs in the air! Why? Heads were being replaced due to spit out plugs! Maybe "uranus" was lined up with the planets?
More than likely your friend exaggerates or lies...or your do.
Personally,I think you just flat out don't like the 4.2,for personal reasons maybe,I dont know.But after its take off in 97 it has come along way.
Pretty much anyone that knows a damn thing about Ford trucks knows the initial 4.2L runs had prevelant crank-related problems. Ford did address the issue, but lo and behold, once every couple months a 4.2L would come into the Ford dealership for bottom end issues. It is not a widespread problem any longer, but neither are the spark plugs on Modulars when properly maintained.
As for disliking the 4.2 for "personal reasons", well, if you consider working on them and driving them and finding them underwhelming primarily due to their horrible NVH "personal reasons," then you are correct. The 4.6L is a better engine in every respect.
BTW,I still dont see those postings of the cranks going bad.I think you made that up!
You mean like you made up your Ford tech "friend"? If I didn't have personal experiences on these issues I might have believed you, too bad for you I do.
I wonder how many of you that are completely trashing the 4.2 have actually owned one? My experience has been great. I would own another. Absolutely the only thing you might give up is the V8 sound. The debate over the failures are rediculous. Most engines never experience these premaure failures. They are both good engines. My 4.2 is very smooth and reliable. Why scare someone off from a good deal if you do not have any experience with the product you are trashing?
Comparing the 4.2L to the 4.6L you give up Modular engine family reliability (Modular >>> Essex), the V8 sound, the inherent balance of a 90 degree V8 (90 degree V6 is inherently unbalanced), 30 horsepower, 40 lb.-ft and gain no fuel economy in return. Saying the 4.2L is "smooth" is laughable, these are not smooth running engines in the least. They rank right up there with the 4.0L, 4.0L SOHC and 3.8L/3.9L as Ford's worst engines on the NVH front.
I have 163K on my 97 4.2. I use it as my daily driver and have never had any engine related problems. I make about 15mpg in the city, and find that the truck is not NVH prone.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.