Notices

Quarter Mile calculation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 08:11 AM
  #16  
albatross's Avatar
albatross
New User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Quarter Mile calculation

Ok,approximately how much power is lost before it makes it to the rear wheels. I thought it was around 30-40%, can anyone be a bit more precise. I would like to run mid tens and I need about 550 rear wheel according to the program. Providing my '55 F100 project weighs the 3300 I thought it did (which might also be a bit out). Can someone put me straight.
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 08:24 PM
  #17  
karljay's Avatar
karljay
Cargo Master
25 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 18
From: Northern California
Quarter Mile calculation

 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 08:34 PM
  #18  
karljay's Avatar
karljay
Cargo Master
25 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 18
From: Northern California
Quarter Mile calculation

I personally don't think you can look at it like that but I may be wrong.

I've heard that the C6 is a hog, using about 60~75HP and that a stick will use much less.

The problem I have is that I don't understand why a stick would use say 40HP with a 300HP engine and then 50HP with a 400HP engine. I'm no pro here, but it seems that it would be more constant reguardless of the HP from the engine. If taken to the extream, the C6 in a 215HP 360 and a 500HP 428CJ would be hugely different, but yet the same tranny.

this might be a small point here, but these calcs don't take into account the design of the truck, with the big flat front grill vs say a vette 'knife edge' front end that should make a difference. But they still make a good quick reference.
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 09:13 PM
  #19  
danlee's Avatar
danlee
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
Quarter Mile calculation

Ok,approximately how much power is lost before it makes it to the rear wheels. I thought it was around 30-40%, can anyone be a bit more precise. I would like to run mid tens and I need about 550 rear wheel according to the program. Providing my '55 F100 project weighs the 3300 I thought it did (which might also be a bit out). Can someone put me straight.
I thought that my '53 F100 weighed in at about 4000 lbs.
I don't know where that rear Wheel HP comes from, but the numbers that I get are close to what Drag 2000 gives me for Peak Engine HP. I think that the mid tens would require about 550 HP from a 3300 lb machine. This calculator also ignores the Aerodynamics and gearing as does the equation that started this whole thing.
It also assumes that everything else is set up properly, like traction, shifting etc.

An automatic tranny loses HP due to slippage. The higher an engine revs, the more the torque converter slips. A high stall torque converter, as used in racing slips even more. So the more power an engine can make, the more the tranny loses. A stick coupled to a high HP engine will require a better clutch etc. This may be converted to HP loss.

The bottom line is that these tools can give you some idea of the performance capability of a engine vehicle combination, but the real proof is when you get on the track and put the petal to the metal.
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2001 | 11:21 PM
  #20  
albatross's Avatar
albatross
New User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Quarter Mile calculation

Thanks for that. I had picked up on another thread that a '51 F1 weighted in at 3300lbs which I thought was a bit light but your 4000lbs is probably closer to the mark. Anyone else know an accurate weight for their 50's F100?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scotty's 52 F3
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
Apr 3, 2020 03:31 PM
Rob_17
2017 - 2022 Super Duty
3
Mar 15, 2017 01:32 PM
Rob_17
All Things Towing
12
Mar 12, 2017 05:38 PM
RainDesert
6.2L V8
4
Apr 4, 2016 12:25 PM
BigF350
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
22
Oct 14, 2005 01:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE