2004 - 2008 F150 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Ford F150's with 5.4 V8, 4.6 V8 engine
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

More MPG Results...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-16-2007, 09:53 PM
bridge's Avatar
bridge
bridge is offline
Sick 'n Tired
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 2,968
Received 45 Likes on 23 Posts
More MPG Results...

This is a follow-up to this post: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/6...e-results.html

All data points are reformulated unleaded, except for the last two which are E85.

Gas 4/9/07 to 7/6/07: 87 Octane with 10% ETOH purchased at the local Kroger and at the same pump every time.
Gas 7/12/07 and 7/16/07: E85 (85% ETOH and 15% Unleaded) purchased at the local Kroger, at the same pump.
Driving Habits: 60 to 70% city. I'm not heavy on the pedal on a regular basis but I occasionally like to hear what I've paid for.

Modifications
Tonneau Cover: UnderCover installed 6/2/2007
CAI: Volant installed 5/12/07
Cat-Back: Magnaflow Model 16614 installed 4/12/07

Results:
There is a modest increase in mileage that has little to no significance. The slight increase could also be attributed to the fact that the engine is still breaking in and as of today has only 6200 miles. There is no evidence of a substantial individual or cumulative affect of the three add-ons. Also, seasonal reformulation of the gas around here could also affect the results.

However, the most interesting finding is that the trip computer's MPG estimate looks accurate. I found this surprising seeing as I've read many posts that questioned it's accuracy. I reset the computer after every refill.

The Average Cost/Mile:

Unleaded: $.08/mile
E85: $.11/mile
There are only two E85 data points so I assumed the same miles (about 235) and extrapolated 12 more E85 points to provide an average of 264 miles per tank for all data points. Given average miles driven this represents about $8 per tank difference or roughly 27% difference to run E85.

Keep in mind that my only unleaded source is reformulated 10% ETOH gas for added oxygenation. If you are in area that receives non-oxygenated gas the differences will be greater.

The only upgrade left to test is an Edge Programmer. Once I procure one I'll add some data points and post the results. If the data remains this flat I'll also be posting a few items on Ebay.
 
Attached Images  

Last edited by bridge; 07-16-2007 at 09:57 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-01-2008, 04:41 PM
CMOS's Avatar
CMOS
CMOS is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 1,055
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Very nice info Bridge. Thanks.

CMOS
 
  #3  
Old 01-01-2008, 10:07 PM
SteveVFX4's Avatar
SteveVFX4
SteveVFX4 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice write-up.

That has been my experience too. If you do mostly city driving, the simple bolt-on performace parts don't do anything to increase MPG's. I got tired of the noise so I sold my Airaid intake and Magnaflow exhaust.
 
  #4  
Old 01-02-2008, 06:59 AM
Robbins 04 f150's Avatar
Robbins 04 f150
Robbins 04 f150 is offline
New User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most improvements are made on cai's and exhausts are made at high rpm's usually outside the average driving range. although I do have a edge on my f150 but nothing else.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
clouden
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
5
05-02-2011 12:05 AM
Timbo1985F150
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
5
08-31-2009 04:10 PM
Soilman
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
14
01-17-2009 06:48 PM
econolinedriver
1997 - 2003 F150
3
02-17-2007 07:58 AM
exdriver
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
14
02-02-2007 06:53 PM



Quick Reply: More MPG Results...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.