Notices
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel Engine fitted to 2008 - 2010 F250, F350 and F450 pickup trucks and F350 + Cab Chassis

AFE cold air intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
Wrinkleface's Avatar
Wrinkleface
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
AFE cold air intake?

Got my 450 about a month ago and have not been on here much lately. I know this has been talked about B4. Does it work?, any probs? warranty issues? Thanx 4 re-hashing! Tracy
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #2  
SANDDEMON08's Avatar
SANDDEMON08
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 2
From: Henderson, NV
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Wrinkleface
Got my 450 about a month ago and have not been on here much lately. I know this has been talked about B4. Does it work?, any probs? warranty issues? Thanx 4 re-hashing! Tracy
There is a law known as the Magnuson-Moss Warranty, that prohibits a manufacturer from void a warranty simply because you did not use a specified air filter. They must prove how the filter actually caused the problem.
I have the cold air intake on my truck, and i like it. Really brings out the sound of the turbos. I noticed a diffrence in the performance and fuel milage, about 1 MPG increase.

 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 11:00 AM
  #3  
thelogster's Avatar
thelogster
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Magnusson Moss keeps manufacturers from denying warranty coverage if you don't use their filters and instead use a comparable filter. However, with these airboxes, you modify the original design and the filter comes no where close to what the OE filter from Donaldson does.


Too many modification companies push M&M to get us to spend our $. However, the law has nothing to do with modifying the vehicle from its original design and engineering.
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #4  
SANDDEMON08's Avatar
SANDDEMON08
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 2
From: Henderson, NV
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by thelogster
Magnusson Moss keeps manufacturers from denying warranty coverage if you don't use their filters and instead use a comparable filter. However, with these airboxes, you modify the original design and the filter comes no where close to what the OE filter from Donaldson does.


Too many modification companies push M&M to get us to spend our $. However, the law has nothing to do with modifying the vehicle from its original design and engineering.
I agree with the fact that the donaldson nano fiber filter is a good filter, but the filteration between the two is still 99.9 percent but the AFE multi media filter is more free flowing. The new fords already have a cold air intake system. Changing the air box, affects the sound level more than anything due the filter being more free flowing.

So, if the filter is meeting the manufacture's intended filteration, and the air box is still a cold air intake system, why would this not be comparable filter system?

Just curious?
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #5  
thelogster's Avatar
thelogster
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
A Donaldson engineer tested these aftermarket mods and posted the findings below. I went on AFE and could not find anything where their posted their cleaning efficiency. Can you provide any link to where they officially poste it?

I have tested some of the washable/rechargeable type filters, but none

for this specific application. I can say that from the results of what

I have tested, that these type of filters have no place on MY

Powerstroke Diesel.

Normally, I will go and buy a system if the manufacturer says it

performs better than the standard OEM PowerCore in all areas. All of

those areas are:

1) Dust Loading: PowerCore in this application holds nearly 3 lbs of

dirt and that is pretty hard to beat with any element of similar size.

2) Filtering Efficiency: PowerCore is 99.99% efficient, I have tested

some popular competing elements in the past that have only achieved a

75% efficiency rating. This would mean when loaded to 3 lbs of dirt

like the PowerCore, it would let 3/4 lb (340 grams) of that dirt pass

directly to the engine(doing the math PowerCore stops all but about

1/10th of a gram). 100,000 rpm turbo blades do not like dirt.

3) Restriction: The OEM PowerCore is well under the Ford spec of 7" of

H2O restriction at the flow rate of 775 cfm. As I stated in a previous

post, I have tested competitors units that can't even flow what the OEM

PowerCore does when it is completly loaded and ready for a change.

Restriction normally works hand in hand with the above mentioned

efficiency. It is usually tough to get a low restriction without

sacrificing filtering efficiency. PowerCore has made this hurdle as it

packs a large amount of high efficiency media in a smaller package.

4) Cold Air Induction: Anyone who know anything about making horsepower

understands that cold air induction is a huge player in the horsepower

equation. Why do you think they make intercoolers? Yes, to cool the

air and make more power. Why then would you strap some goofy air

induction system onto your throttle body that breathes hot underhood

air? When the engine senses that hot air it will defuel to compensate

for the lower density and thus you will make less power.

5) Noise Attenuation: Not always a big player for everyone, but the OEM

PowerCore system does a good job at keeping a muzzle on the high

frequency turbo whine often heard with other systems installed. I have

heard folks on this forum who have said that at first they thought the

whining sound was cool, but then it wore on them and became rather

annoying so they switched back to the OEM system.

So what can we learn from all of this? I guess what we've been told all

alon is true, and that is that there is no such thing as a free lunch,

but there is such a thing called "value" and I think that is where the

PowerCore really shines. Yes, PowerCore does carry a small price

premium, but with that premium are many added benefits. Donaldson

company is not in the business of giving you the cheapest air filter for

your vehicle, but rather the best filter at the best value. If you want

the cheapest, why did you pay $50,000 for your truck?

 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
SANDDEMON08's Avatar
SANDDEMON08
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 2
From: Henderson, NV
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by thelogster
A Donaldson engineer tested these aftermarket mods and posted the findings below. I went on AFE and could not find anything where their posted their cleaning efficiency. Can you provide any link to where they officially poste it?

I have tested some of the washable/rechargeable type filters, but none

for this specific application. I can say that from the results of what

I have tested, that these type of filters have no place on MY

Powerstroke Diesel.

Normally, I will go and buy a system if the manufacturer says it

performs better than the standard OEM PowerCore in all areas. All of

those areas are:

1) Dust Loading: PowerCore in this application holds nearly 3 lbs of

dirt and that is pretty hard to beat with any element of similar size.

2) Filtering Efficiency: PowerCore is 99.99% efficient, I have tested

some popular competing elements in the past that have only achieved a

75% efficiency rating. This would mean when loaded to 3 lbs of dirt

like the PowerCore, it would let 3/4 lb (340 grams) of that dirt pass

directly to the engine(doing the math PowerCore stops all but about

1/10th of a gram). 100,000 rpm turbo blades do not like dirt.

3) Restriction: The OEM PowerCore is well under the Ford spec of 7" of

H2O restriction at the flow rate of 775 cfm. As I stated in a previous

post, I have tested competitors units that can't even flow what the OEM

PowerCore does when it is completly loaded and ready for a change.

Restriction normally works hand in hand with the above mentioned

efficiency. It is usually tough to get a low restriction without

sacrificing filtering efficiency. PowerCore has made this hurdle as it

packs a large amount of high efficiency media in a smaller package.

4) Cold Air Induction: Anyone who know anything about making horsepower

understands that cold air induction is a huge player in the horsepower

equation. Why do you think they make intercoolers? Yes, to cool the

air and make more power. Why then would you strap some goofy air

induction system onto your throttle body that breathes hot underhood

air? When the engine senses that hot air it will defuel to compensate

for the lower density and thus you will make less power.

5) Noise Attenuation: Not always a big player for everyone, but the OEM

PowerCore system does a good job at keeping a muzzle on the high

frequency turbo whine often heard with other systems installed. I have

heard folks on this forum who have said that at first they thought the

whining sound was cool, but then it wore on them and became rather

annoying so they switched back to the OEM system.

So what can we learn from all of this? I guess what we've been told all

alon is true, and that is that there is no such thing as a free lunch,

but there is such a thing called "value" and I think that is where the

PowerCore really shines. Yes, PowerCore does carry a small price

premium, but with that premium are many added benefits. Donaldson

company is not in the business of giving you the cheapest air filter for

your vehicle, but rather the best filter at the best value. If you want

the cheapest, why did you pay $50,000 for your truck?

I stand corrected, it was 99.5 . This is the site that i found. Let me know what you think. Notice the independent test at the bottom of the page.

http://www.afefilters.com/pg7.htm
 

Last edited by SANDDEMON08; Jul 10, 2007 at 12:44 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:52 PM
  #7  
thelogster's Avatar
thelogster
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Driven in the same conditions, a 99.00% filter would pass
10 grams of contaminant through to the engine that would be trapped by the 6.0L OE filter, and a 95% filter would pass 50 grams!

Above was from the Donaldson engineer. So the AFE at 99.5% would pass 5 grams of crud in the same conditions. There also is a concern with sensor readings as the mod boxes change the airflow pattern. They came out with a 'fix' that turns off the reading. I'd rather not have to pay and have the item ignore the OE design and inputs. I'll stick to OE.

 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #8  
SANDDEMON08's Avatar
SANDDEMON08
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 2
From: Henderson, NV
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by thelogster
Driven in the same conditions, a 99.00% filter would pass
10 grams of contaminant through to the engine that would be trapped by the 6.0L OE filter, and a 95% filter would pass 50 grams!


Above was from the Donaldson engineer. So the AFE at 99.5% would pass 5 grams of crud in the same conditions. There also is a concern with sensor readings as the mod boxes change the airflow pattern. They came out with a 'fix' that turns off the reading. I'd rather not have to pay and have the item ignore the OE design and inputs. I'll stick to OE.




If you read the independent study, the proline 7 AFE filter out performed the sae 99.5 test for air filteration, meaning the filteration is better than 99.5.
The Donaldson study you provided did not indicate if the 99.9 was based on fine or course dust which is a big difference.

The 6.0's my have had a problem that needed to be fixed, but the item in disscussion is a 6.4 AFE intake system. I have about 1800 miles on my 6.4 since i changed to the AFE system and have not had any problems with the MAF triping the check engine light.

Its my opinion that AFE did a good job addressing the common issues found with washable/reusable oil-impregnated cotton gauze filters . Im no pro on this but i've done my share of research on the aftermarket filters aviable.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #9  
powerstroked162's Avatar
powerstroked162
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,658
Likes: 0
From: Ellensburg, Washington
Im in the works of developin an air intake kit right now similar to the tymar setup used on the 7.3's. i'll have a write up on it by the end of the month

Cowboy Steve
 
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #10  
ToughBuiltFord's Avatar
ToughBuiltFord
FTE Sponsor
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
The AFE intake is awesome. We have them here at the Motorhaven shop if you're looking for it: http://motorhaven.autoanything.com/air-filters/61A2114A0A0.aspx
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Splatts
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
1
Sep 2, 2012 10:24 PM
tracy_lit5
2004 - 2008 F150
11
Jun 24, 2006 02:50 PM
thooker
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
2
Oct 6, 2005 08:14 AM
Tracy Swanson
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
3
May 20, 2002 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE