CCV mod without inter-cooler ??
http://rides.webshots.com/photo/1292...62001545jROyQF
Thus venting intot he exhaust stream at the proper angle would be a better at pulling CC pressure out. Even venting to atomsphere is more free flowing than the stock system. yes it not best for the enviroment accroding to the scientist. But nearly all heavy duty and ag application diesel are draft tubed (vent to the air) anyway. Doesn't make it good but it still happening all the time.
Cat=0&Number=2327255[/QUOTE]
Whoops...Brain fart.....we are talking boost...my bad! My inexperience to turbo's is showing. It would have to be on "suction side"/pre turbo to draw a vacuum. DUH !!! In that case I like the exhaust evac except it's no good for cat converter I'm told. There again....based on heard/read info..
Seems to me I read a article about "our" PSD's having vacuum applied to crank case from factory ....I think on BAZ's web site..??
Guess I need to STFU and test crank case fir myself..just need to buy another oil cap for experiment..right now race car has my attention.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/a...tid=2680&stc=1
but more vaccum is needed at lower RPM, not enough exhaust flow I guess. What do you think of using the vaccum pump on the engine to pull the vacuum? I'd like to try it but it's assists the brakes so I have'nt messed with it. I'm not sure about the volume it is capable of.
I need to find a truck with the stock CCV and see how much vacuum they make. I've seen 8-10 inches of vacuum on the ones above but that's at peak exhaust flow.
I'll need to know pretty quick though. My 6637 is here and I get the exhaust elbow tomorrow. I'll be ordering the intake hose upgrade within the next month.







