Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Auto RX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #16  
BuffmanLT1's Avatar
BuffmanLT1
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jimdandy
I just go by what I know and have seen. Why does your engine need "cleaning?" If you clean it, what results do you expect?

Todays engines, if maintained properly with quality products, will go for thousands of miles without problems. You don't get the sewage in the oil from combustion byproducts like you did with carb/tbi engines. Electronic fuel injection, computer controls, better combustion chambers for better burning of the fuel have reduced these problems considerably. Better oils, with the cleaning chemicals(detergents) already in them, machining methods, etc., have reduced pollutants immensely.

Unless an engine has been badly neglected, or ran in extreme conditions, I haven't seen "cleaning" as a problem. And, if it needs cleaning, pouring a "fix it in a can" isn't going to help. It needs to be torn down and rebuilt. jd
There are still quite a few engines that have the tendency to sludge up even if proper care. Some of the toyota engines like to do that.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #17  
PW01's Avatar
PW01
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1
"Todays engines, if maintained properly with quality products, will go for thousands of miles without problems. You don't get the sewage in the oil from combustion byproducts like you did with carb/tbi engines. Electronic fuel injection, computer controls, better combustion chambers for better burning of the fuel have reduced these problems considerably. Better oils, with the cleaning chemicals(detergents) already in them, machining methods, etc., have reduced pollutants immensely. "

I think you'd be surprised at what could come out of your engine. Do a little research, and you'll find lots of threads on lots of different forums about how surprised people were by what drained out after the rinse phase. Or better yet, give it a try and post your results.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #18  
jimdandy's Avatar
jimdandy
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by PW01
"I think you'd be surprised at what could come out of your engine. Do a little research, and you'll find lots of threads on lots of different forums about how surprised people were by what drained out after the rinse phase. Or better yet, give it a try and post your results.
Not really, as I do this for a living and make my own observations. If the engine is "cruded up" enough to need a "cleaning," adding a can of some product is a little late. Imaginations and "butt dynos" are wonderful things. jd
 

Last edited by jimdandy; Jun 12, 2007 at 09:17 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 11:37 PM
  #19  
BuffmanLT1's Avatar
BuffmanLT1
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
well jimdandy what do u do for a living then? So you're denying some of the pictures people have posted on Franks site of their progress?
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 07:44 AM
  #20  
jimdandy's Avatar
jimdandy
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by BuffmanLT1
There are still quite a few engines that have the tendency to sludge up even if proper care. Some of the toyota engines like to do that.
This is correct, but the sludging is a design problem, and cannot be cured with additives. These are exceptions to the norm.

If anyone wants to use this stuff, fine. If those using it think it does some good, fine. It's their engine and their money. I have seen just about every chemical imaginable sold in one form or another as the "magic exilir" for automobile engines,(anyone remember Bardhal, Wynn's). The gunk that gets behind valves, and behind the piston rings is like cement, you have to chip it off and any chemical strong enough to dissolve this stuff would have to be so strong and in sufficient quanity that the engine would be damaged if used. You cannot replace worn metal, poor maintenance/driving habits, with some liquid in a can.

As for as testimonials, all the fore mentioned products, Slick 50, STP, etc., also had testimonials, and so called "data" to support their claims. I'll go by what I know. jd

Edit: The supporters of Seafoam make the same claims. Seafoam is pale oil and napthene. What are the ingredients of Auto RX? jd
 

Last edited by jimdandy; Jun 13, 2007 at 07:53 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 09:06 AM
  #21  
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
I'm not exactly sure of all the ingredients, but I do know that Auto-Rx has certain "esters" as main ingredient, similar to what you'd find in pure synthetic oils. These esters are responsible for the higher detergent properties of synthetics, so I would assume they work similarly in ARX...
 

Last edited by Rockledge; Jun 13, 2007 at 09:14 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #22  
jimdandy's Avatar
jimdandy
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by wendell borror
I just saw Carol Shelby endorse this stuff on tv, if Carol says it's so, thats good enough for me.
Amazing!!! The Speed channel is currently carrying the Grand National West races on tv. One of the advertisers is z-Max lubricants. Guess who uses it in every one of his cars? Why, it's ole Carroll Shelby. His engines must not have anything but additives for lubrication.

If you visit the site www.zmax.com they have testimonials, show how the product works. $30 a pop. Gotta be good stuff. I wonder if they are owned by Auto RX, hmmmmmm................. jd
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #23  
Rockledge's Avatar
Rockledge
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 16
From: Connecticut
ARX is a cleaner, not an additive. It doesn't profess to do anything except clean engine internals without using solvents.

And FWIW, Carroll Shelby is not an ARX spokesperson or endorser. I think Wendell may have been thinking about Z-Max when he posted that.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #24  
BuffmanLT1's Avatar
BuffmanLT1
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
jimdandy maybe you should analyze the auto-rx then. Like mentioned it's a cleaner, not some additive. It contains esters last time I checked among other things
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #25  
wendell borror's Avatar
wendell borror
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
"I'm bad", I most of got it mixed up what ole Carol was endoseing, as I saw it on the speed channel. I thought it was RX, it might of been MAX, It sure sucks to be an idiot, I know from experience.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #26  
fflintstone's Avatar
fflintstone
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: Aurora
Originally Posted by wendell borror
"I'm bad", I most of got it mixed up what ole Carol was endoseing, as I saw it on the speed channel. I thought it was RX, it might of been MAX, It sure sucks to be an idiot, I know from experience.
Yeah, sure. Every time somebody mentions something with an X in it, you get alllllll confused eh? I know that every time my girlfreind reminds me to pick up my dirty 'SOX', I'm all over her like a wet t-shirt. LOL

Fred
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 02:16 AM
  #27  
BuffmanLT1's Avatar
BuffmanLT1
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
well I'll post any results I find from the old ranger. I only have 1000 miles left on the rinse phase. Measured compression before hand. Going to see if it improves at all, etc. Prolly do a few UOA afterwards. Who knows. I estimate this engine has to have around 230,000 miles if driven 14k a year from it's birth.
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #28  
jimdandy's Avatar
jimdandy
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 1
Not to get into semantics, but it is added to the engine oil, hence additive. It is not a stand alone cleaner like some fuel injector cleaners. That doesn't matter anyway, doesn't make the product any better/worse. I like the zMax better, better advertising hype. jd
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #29  
PW01's Avatar
PW01
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 1
I guess that makes laundry detergent an additive and not a cleaner, because you add it to the water instead using it straight.
 
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #30  
jimdandy's Avatar
jimdandy
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by PW01
I guess that makes laundry detergent an additive and not a cleaner, because you add it to the water instead using it straight.
If the water already had detergent in it, and you add more, or you add some bleach............
This thread is kinda turned to a nowhere direction. No minds will change, and I have stated my point of view based on personal experiences. The readers can make up their own minds, but I don't want to get in to a pissing contest about it. jd
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 AM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE