Notices
Aerostar Ford Aerostar

ECT Resistance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2007 | 08:00 PM
  #1  
KC8JPZ's Avatar
KC8JPZ
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Question ECT Resistance?

Does anyone happen to know the normal range of resistance for the engine coolant temp sensor for a 95 3.0L?

Thanks,
Jim
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #2  
96_4wdr's Avatar
96_4wdr
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 5
From: Washington state
59 k ohms at 50d F
24.3 k ohms at 86 d F
2k ohms at 212d F
1.18 k ohms at 248d F
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 08:40 PM
  #3  
KC8JPZ's Avatar
KC8JPZ
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Thanks allot, I thought that maybe the thermostat may have been stuck open. Replaced it and still have very low tempeture on the gauge. I think that possibly I may have a faulty ECT now. Looks original. For less than 20 bucks, what the heck.

Thanks again,
Jim
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #4  
96_4wdr's Avatar
96_4wdr
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 5
From: Washington state
temp gauge uses 1 wire sender
Aero's read near bottom of temp. scale which really has little meaning

PCM uses ECT 2 wire sender and has no connection to temp gauge

96 and later with OBDII will read out temp to accuracy of 1d F with scanner from ECT
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #5  
KC8JPZ's Avatar
KC8JPZ
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I think I see now. The ECT I have with the single wire is only for temp gauge? Or the temp sensor I am looking at is different from the one I should be concerned with. I am getting trouble code for O2 sensor and running rich. I thought that maybe my temp wasn't getting up to proper level to run lean enough and causing a chain reaction giving my trouble code on the O2.

Guess I will look further into this.

Thanks,
Jim
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 09:18 PM
  #6  
Aeroman59's Avatar
Aeroman59
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kitchener,Ontario,Canada
Originally Posted by KC8JPZ
I think I see now. The ECT I have with the single wire is only for temp gauge? Or the temp sensor I am looking at is different from the one I should be concerned with. I am getting trouble code for O2 sensor and running rich. I thought that maybe my temp wasn't getting up to proper level to run lean enough and causing a chain reaction giving my trouble code on the O2.

Guess I will look further into this.

Thanks,
Jim
If your engine is not getting up to closed loop temp you should get a code. Does the upper hose ( near the alternator) get too hot to touch after a 15 min highway drive & feels hard ? If yes then likely you are running hot enough to get into closed loop fuel control.

Is the engine running rich or the fuel trim is at adaptive limit rich ?
What is the code number ?
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #7  
krankshaft's Avatar
krankshaft
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey, New Jersey
The Aero uses 2 temperature sensors the temp sensor with one wire coming from it is for the instrument cluster it has no other function.

The temp sensor with two wires going into it is the one the PCM uses.

If the sensor is faulty the PCM will assume that the engine is cold even after its warmed up and will run with a rich fuel mixture. Since the PCM is not getting the proper temperature feedback to adjust to a proper fuel mixture after warmup.

If you are running rich check out the PCM temp sensor first.

Here is a diagram of where it is:



The water temperature indicator sensor is what the instrument cluter uses that is not the one you want.

The one labeled ECT (Engine Coolant Temperature Sensor) is the one you want to check out. As you can see it has a 2 wire connector rather then the one connector on the instrument cluser sender unit.
 

Last edited by krankshaft; May 1, 2007 at 09:40 PM.
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #8  
copper_90680's Avatar
copper_90680
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,452
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Club FTE Gold Member
Hi KC:

Welcome to our Aerostar forum

To rehash what others have said, the ECT has 2 wires and it feeds the computer, not the gage.

The temperature sender is much cheaper ($5) and it feeds the gage on the panel. That one actually doesn't affect your engine performance at all. And yes, it does go bad, resulting in low reading on the gage, at least on more than one occasions on my car.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 2, 2007 | 05:00 AM
  #9  
KC8JPZ's Avatar
KC8JPZ
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I am pretty sure the engine is getting up to temp. Just the PCM doesn't think so. I get plenty of heat from the heater and yes, the hose does get hot. Sounds like it may possibly be 2 temp sensors gone bad.I will let you all know what I find.

Thanks guys,
Jim
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 05:37 AM
  #10  
96_4wdr's Avatar
96_4wdr
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 5
From: Washington state
clean the MAF and replace the O2 sensor if older than 50k miles

remove MAF element with Torx screws...soak in shot glass full of TB cleaner for 15>30 minutes...examine with magnifier lens....any dirt or crud sitll remaining=replace MAF
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 08:22 PM
  #11  
Aeroman59's Avatar
Aeroman59
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kitchener,Ontario,Canada
Originally Posted by KC8JPZ
I am pretty sure the engine is getting up to temp. Just the PCM doesn't think so. I get plenty of heat from the heater and yes, the hose does get hot. Sounds like it may possibly be 2 temp sensors gone bad.I will let you all know what I find.

Thanks guys,
Jim

Are the plugs black/sooty? whats your mpg's like ? Fuel pressure regulator? clogged air filter, leaking injector(s). MAP/ MAF sensors. If the ECU thinks your engine is too cold for closed loop it should give a code like 116 (coolant temp higher or lower than expected). Change the 2 wire sensor first.

Front O2 sensor could be faulty. Run the engine at idle ,warmed up for a few minutes & connect an high impedance ANALOGUE multimeter to the wires from the O2 sensor, I think the engine will still run in fault mode. Needle should swing from 0.1 to 0.9 volts AC. (this may happen quite quickly the meter may not be able to respond fast enough). If it is steady at above about 0.6-0.7 volts or higher, then replace the front O2 sensor.

Aeroman.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #12  
Aeroman59's Avatar
Aeroman59
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kitchener,Ontario,Canada
Originally Posted by Aeroman59
Are the plugs black/sooty? whats your mpg's like ? Fuel pressure regulator? clogged air filter, leaking injector(s). MAP/ MAF sensors. If the ECU thinks your engine is too cold for closed loop it should give a code like 116 (coolant temp higher or lower than expected). Change the 2 wire sensor first.

Front O2 sensor could be faulty. Run the engine at idle ,warmed up for a few minutes & connect an high impedance ANALOGUE multimeter to the wires from the O2 sensor, I think the engine will still run in fault mode. Needle should swing from 0.1 to 0.9 volts AC. (this may happen quite quickly the meter may not be able to respond fast enough). If it is STEADY (no switching) at above about 0.6-0.7 volts or higher, then replace the front O2 sensor.

Aeroman.
To get the real picture you need to monitor Fuel trim. If Long term fuel trim ( LTFT) is - 10% or more,then that is a clue that some other reason is causing the rich mixture condition in the engine. Negative fuel trim means the EEC is trying to "lean" out the mixture from a monitored rich condition from the O2 sensor. The EEC monitors O2 switching every drive cycle & if the O2 sensor fails the test limits, then a code will be set (OBD2), not sure about OBD1, but I'm pretty sure that the system can test the O2 sensors. If no code then as far as the EEC is concerned the sensor is O.K.

Aeroman
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2007 | 04:20 AM
  #13  
96_4wdr's Avatar
96_4wdr
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 5
From: Washington state
no way to monitor LTFT on 95 Ford OBDI EEC-IV system
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2007 | 07:24 AM
  #14  
Aeroman59's Avatar
Aeroman59
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kitchener,Ontario,Canada
Originally Posted by 96_4wdr
no way to monitor LTFT on 95 Ford OBDI EEC-IV system
Not strictly true , you can still use dataloggers, not sure where the tap in is to the EEC, (is it the J3 service port?), it's how the enthusiasts tune up their engines nowadays, they even reprogram the tables for injection time etc.
http://webpages.charter.net/eecanalyzer/Tuners.htm
http://www.tweecer.com/
Aeroman.
 

Last edited by Aeroman59; May 6, 2007 at 07:43 AM.
Reply
Old May 6, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #15  
96_4wdr's Avatar
96_4wdr
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,720
Likes: 5
From: Washington state
out of most Aero DIYer price range

most 4L mudder, rock and creek crawler and logging road racers here convert over to a OBDII EEC-V harness, sensors and PCM
much easier to tune and troubleshoot

the EEC-IV stuff is disappearing quickly, almost no support
 

Last edited by 96_4wdr; May 6, 2007 at 09:31 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE