302/351 Mild Build Questions?
#1
302/351 Mild Build Questions?
1986 f150 4wd fi 302
i have a burnt or bent valve in the drivers side head. truck sounds like a disiel. so i have 2 ideas to make it stronger for towing:
1: set of heads from a 302 mustang cov't heads have 49,000 miles on them, paired with a nice torquey cam. posibly headers with this would i benifit more by haveing the heads ported and polished and decked? i mostly mean the hp to dollar ratio.
2. go to the yard and pull a set of 351w heads and cam. as well as the computer wiring harness, and complete intake mani. posible a set of headers. maybe decking port and polishing
3. leave well enough alone and just swap the mustang 302 heads on it and drive it.
looking for the best bang for the buck. i tow a car hauler and my jeep in to the mountains with a bed full of camping equipment.
i have a burnt or bent valve in the drivers side head. truck sounds like a disiel. so i have 2 ideas to make it stronger for towing:
1: set of heads from a 302 mustang cov't heads have 49,000 miles on them, paired with a nice torquey cam. posibly headers with this would i benifit more by haveing the heads ported and polished and decked? i mostly mean the hp to dollar ratio.
2. go to the yard and pull a set of 351w heads and cam. as well as the computer wiring harness, and complete intake mani. posible a set of headers. maybe decking port and polishing
3. leave well enough alone and just swap the mustang 302 heads on it and drive it.
looking for the best bang for the buck. i tow a car hauler and my jeep in to the mountains with a bed full of camping equipment.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 967 Likes
on
765 Posts
Originally Posted by SPRPRBGT
looking for the best bang for the buck. i tow a car hauler and my jeep in to the mountains with a bed full of camping equipment.
#5
oooo is there any place i can find out what heads are in my truck via the vin or something. but i guese if i pull off the bad head i can see the code. compare it to the mustang heads and if they are different ill just get the head fixed.
i am correct that not all the heads will work on any block? im replacing both heads so doese it really matter what the head code is?
i am correct that not all the heads will work on any block? im replacing both heads so doese it really matter what the head code is?
#6
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 967 Likes
on
765 Posts
Originally Posted by SPRPRBGT
i am correct that not all the heads will work on any block? im replacing both heads so does it really matter what the head code is?
#7
Trending Topics
#8
thanks for the info so far.
i was talking with the guy that has the heads and he has a hydrolic cam and lifters out of a 2000 explorer ho. he said its supposed to be a torquey cam. i can have it. any one know the grind on it? and what i can expect performance wise. it has to better then what i have now..
i was talking with the guy that has the heads and he has a hydrolic cam and lifters out of a 2000 explorer ho. he said its supposed to be a torquey cam. i can have it. any one know the grind on it? and what i can expect performance wise. it has to better then what i have now..
#9
The Explorer cam is called the F4TE. Duration is 256/266 (advetised, not @.050) lift is .422/.445 with 1.6 rockers. Add .030 to that for 1.7's. I run one in my V8 89 Ranger with ported heads and a 4 speed & the 1.7 rockers. Good all around cam, smooth idle, pulls from idle to 6000 rpms. Great mileage. Also a great choice for a lower than 9 to 1 compression ratio 5.0 or 5.8 (if it's a roller block) The specs are just a tad shy of the GT/HO 5.0 cam, with 10 degrees less duration and .020 less lift on the intake side. This cam was used in all 94-97 E & F150-250's with a 5.0, the 94-97 351W roller motor and the 96-2001 Explorer/Mountaineer 5.0.
#10
wow awesome info...... my block is not a hydrolic block but the heads are. will i have to change anything?
im pretty dum when it comes to cames. what is the "with 1.6 rockers. Add .030 to that for 1.7's" doese that mean you didnt use the stock rockers. or that you used spacers?
could you break it down a little for me. thanks
im pretty dum when it comes to cames. what is the "with 1.6 rockers. Add .030 to that for 1.7's" doese that mean you didnt use the stock rockers. or that you used spacers?
could you break it down a little for me. thanks
#11
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 967 Likes
on
765 Posts
Originally Posted by SPRPRBGT
wow awesome info...... my block is not a hydrolic block but the heads are. will i have to change anything?
Originally Posted by SPRPRBGT
im pretty dum when it comes to cams. what is the "with 1.6 rockers. Add .030 to that for 1.7's" does that mean you don't use the stock rockers. or that you used spacers?
#12
#13
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 967 Likes
on
765 Posts
Originally Posted by SPRPRBGT
great. as far as the ratio of the rockers. both heads (f150 and mustang) will have the 1.6:1? im guesing i can buy the 1.7:1 rockers, are they a stock swap or and after market only? and the lifters i would just use the ones that are with the cam already?
Ford windsor heads use pedistal mount rockers, so aftermarket pedistal mount rockers are a direct bolt on without changing anything else.
BTW.. you need the roller lifters, spider and dogbones assembly along with that Explorer roller cam to install it. You also need to change the distributor drive gear. You cannot use the existing lifters, pushrods, or drive gear in your motor now with a roller cam.
#14
#15
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 967 Likes
on
765 Posts
Originally Posted by SPRPRBGT
you probably saw this one coming, dogbones and spiders?
for the money i spend on other parts to make this cam work it looks like id be better with ordering a flat tappet cam
for the money i spend on other parts to make this cam work it looks like id be better with ordering a flat tappet cam