Notices
Modular V10 (6.8l)  

Increase Milage 10%!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #1  
wfof250v10's Avatar
wfof250v10
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 3
From: SPARKS NEVADA
Increase Milage 10%!!!!!!

Ok...I'm looking through adds and see from a capitalist claiming increase gas

milage by 10% or more by simply placing a magnet around the gas line!!!!!
WOW I never thought about this .....It breaks up the carbon clumps, so

the fuel burns more effiently, you know like taking asprin to break up the blood

clots flowing threw our bodies!!!! Is this a bunch of crap or what?

Does anyone know about this or tried it. I got magnets maybe I should try it and report.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #2  
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
Club FTE Silver Member

Carbon clumps!? yeah...those damn carbon clumps.

Magnets (et al) have been BUSTED by many independant tests. Not sure how many times it has been said here but: Manufacturer's pay a fine when their produced fleet doesn't meet the CAFE requirements. All of them would be glad to buy some cheap magnets to get out of paying the fine to the EPA. Most pay it because they sell more trucks & SUVs than cars which get better mileage.
 

Last edited by Monsta; Apr 11, 2007 at 06:10 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #3  
wfof250v10's Avatar
wfof250v10
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 3
From: SPARKS NEVADA
Thanks Ken, I try to only fill up with "clump free" gas so I guess I won't need any!
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #4  
ChrisA.'s Avatar
ChrisA.
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington,NC
How about we just throw an asprin in the tank every day
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 01:09 AM
  #5  
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Monsta
Most pay it because they sell more trucks & SUVs than cars which get better mileage.
I stand corrected. Light trucks and cars have different standards.

Most don't pay it. Although many have. I have a feeling in 2008 Ford might be paying since there is quite a jump in the requirement. (20.7 average now versus 22.5 for '08) Maybe all the F-150s will have magnets attached to get that 10% increase.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 06:30 AM
  #6  
FortyFords's Avatar
FortyFords
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 7
From: USA
Better get rid of those "Carbon Clumps" soon or we will paying the "Carbon Tax"

WAGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rich
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 07:07 AM
  #7  
KRB's Avatar
KRB
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Why not get a 20% increase in fuel mileage today at the total cost of nothing!!

Drive at 55 instead of 75/80!!! It works
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 07:36 AM
  #8  
Fredvon4's Avatar
Fredvon4
Logistics Pro
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 38
Club FTE Silver Member

Talking dissenting opinion

KRB

Don't you think the NET fuel consumption balances out by the added TIME it takes to complete a trip...and all the associated costs added; like the longer time being compensated for the hourly workers whose job is on the road???

We had a NATIONAL speed limit of 55 for almost two decades... it didn't work then

And for what it is worth...YMMV (pun intended)

55mph vs. 75mph on my truck does NOT yield a 20% fuel savings

What does work is driving my motor cycle....And if the weather is right the BSEG factor can be maintained this way too....
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #9  
FortyFords's Avatar
FortyFords
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,859
Likes: 7
From: USA
Originally Posted by Fredvon4
KRB

Don't you think the NET fuel consumption balances out by the added TIME it takes to complete a trip...and all the associated costs added; like the longer time being compensated for the hourly workers whose job is on the road???

We had a NATIONAL speed limit of 55 for almost two decades... it didn't work then

And for what it is worth...YMMV (pun intended)

55mph vs. 75mph on my truck does NOT yield a 20% fuel savings

What does work is driving my motor cycle....And if the weather is right the BSEG factor can be maintained this way too....
Fred ,don't bugs taste funny though ! in the BSEG

Rich
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #10  
Big Orn's Avatar
Big Orn
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,643
Likes: 8
From: NE Texas
Originally Posted by FortyFords
Better get rid of those "Carbon Clumps" soon or we will paying the "Carbon Tax"

WAGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rich
Knowledge is Power, Rich.
Atomic carbons, or more precisely, atomized carbon (AC), can build-up in the fuel service lines causing what is scientifically termed as Dinoflatulence. This condition can create multiple symptoms, least of which is called Car Poot.
Car Poot (CP) was once thought to be remedied by installing magnetic devices, called Magnetic Devices (MD), along the fuel lines between the fuel tank and fuel rail in any position, but more effectively near the injectors.
In tests performed using the MD it was proven that in most cases the AC would adhere to fields generated but could not maintain a definite shape, i.e., diameter and length, in order for the engine to successfully digest the treated fuel, thus causing CP. The earlier trial runs that were thought to be successful using MD produced CP, but was not detected, giving a false reading. This condition was later called Silent But Deadly (SBD) CP.
In closing, we are reluctant to concur with the findings of independent pseudo scientists that use MD to prevent CP by eliminating AC in fuel.


Anybody got any of that yellow salt? And whose turn is it to get the beer?
 

Last edited by Big Orn; Apr 12, 2007 at 09:32 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #11  
PROSTOCK's Avatar
PROSTOCK
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,055
Likes: 167
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by Fredvon4
KRB


What does work is driving my motor cycle....And if the weather is right the BSEG factor can be maintained this way too....
Amen brother!
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 09:22 AM
  #12  
Fredvon4's Avatar
Fredvon4
Logistics Pro
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,733
Likes: 38
Club FTE Silver Member

I wonder some times if we were to properly apply each of the 10% gas saving aftermarket items if we could zoom down the road generating Fuel instead of using any.....

I mean---- there are so many devices that Guarantee 10~20% fuel savings we sure ought to be able to achieve a 0% fuel usage rate at 0mph.... OH wait...sheesh... we can already do that without any doo dads...

never mind... back to them SBD CPs....
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #13  
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Sit. Stay.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 20
From: Washington State
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Big Orn
Atomic carbons, or more precisely, atomized carbon (AC), can build-up in the fuel service lines causing what is scientifically termed as Dinoflatulence. This condition can create multiple symptoms, least of which is called Car Poot.
Car Poot (CP) was once thought to be remedied by installing magnetic devices, called Magnetic Devices (MD), along the fuel lines between the fuel tank and fuel rail in any position, but more effectively near the injectors.
In tests performed using the MD it was proven that in most cases the AC would adhere to fields generated but could not maintain a definite shape, i.e., diameter and length, in order for the engine to successfully digest the treated fuel, thus causing CP. The earlier trial runs that were thought to be successful using MD produced CP, but was not detected, giving a false reading. This condition was later called Silent But Deadly (SBD) CP.
In closing, we are reluctant to concur with the findings of independent pseudo scientists that use MD to prevent CP by eliminating AC in fuel.
That's some funny BS.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #14  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 421
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Wanna see something even funnier?

I was visiting the ATHS.ORG website, and someone posted about this fuel-saver device for diesels.

It's SO GOOD - it installs inline in the fuel line, or common rail, and it CHANGES THE DIRECTION OF FLOW of the fuel so that it atomizes better. Yes, that's the official line.

It looks like an inline fuel filter.

Did you know, that it can be installed ANYWHERE ... in the common rail after the injection pump, or in the fuel line going TO the injection pump.

There was a long post from a fleet mechanic who said they had installed them in certain trucks in the fleet, and they IMMEDIATELY saw a .5mpg difference (or something like that).

Problem? They told the drivers.

Now, how the HECK does diesel fuel get swirled around and atomizes better?

Funnier thing? Lots of large truckers actually believe it. Guess it was worth the $250 or $300 or whatever it cost. Amazing...

--

What's sad is the thing is probably a pressure-reducer (or flow?) and all these guys with these $100K's worth of trucks are running leaner... can't wait to see the rebuild bill on them things...
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #15  
wfof250v10's Avatar
wfof250v10
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 3
From: SPARKS NEVADA
Originally Posted by Big Orn
Knowledge is Power, Rich.
Atomic carbons, or more precisely, atomized carbon (AC), can build-up in the fuel service lines causing what is scientifically termed as Dinoflatulence. This condition can create multiple symptoms, least of which is called Car Poot.
Car Poot (CP) was once thought to be remedied by installing magnetic devices, called Magnetic Devices (MD), along the fuel lines between the fuel tank and fuel rail in any position, but more effectively near the injectors.
In tests performed using the MD it was proven that in most cases the AC would adhere to fields generated but could not maintain a definite shape, i.e., diameter and length, in order for the engine to successfully digest the treated fuel, thus causing CP. The earlier trial runs that were thought to be successful using MD produced CP, but was not detected, giving a false reading. This condition was later called Silent But Deadly (SBD) CP.
In closing, we are reluctant to concur with the findings of independent pseudo scientists that use MD to prevent CP by eliminating AC in fuel.


Anybody got any of that yellow salt? And whose turn is it to get the beer?
Now thats some heavy stuff...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE