3.0L Powerstroke Diesel Discuss the forthcoming 3.0L V6 Ford diesel in the F150

Ford Developing a New Diesel.....QUICKLY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:28 PM
parkland's Avatar
parkland
parkland is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
manitoba-

Thats a liter. As in 1.22 per LITER.
 
  #47  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:31 PM
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
MisterCMK is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Blue Hill Township
Posts: 24,705
Received 53 Likes on 43 Posts
So that would be around $4.61 USD per gallon for gasoline and $4.69 USD per gallon of diesel. I am surprised that they are that close.
 
  #48  
Old 04-16-2008, 07:53 PM
parkland's Avatar
parkland
parkland is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
dont be suprised about nothing man, I recently stopped workin in the oilfield. One thing i'll tell you is that whenever prices go lower, they just stop pumping. they make their own "demand".
 
  #49  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:29 AM
mnmwhit's Avatar
mnmwhit
mnmwhit is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Pole Alaska
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't think they would make enough power for the EXPY (too heavy) but great power plant for the Sport Trac, Explorer, Ranger, hmmmmm Ford 500 maybe?

Originally Posted by jmaskew
Here's the specs"
The 2.5L Engine gets 28.7 mpg
The 3.0L Engine gets 26 mpg

Wouldn't these engines be great in the Ford Explorer and the Expedition?
 
  #50  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:56 AM
jmaskew's Avatar
jmaskew
jmaskew is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 1,710
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by mnmwhit
I don't think they would make enough power for the EXPY (too heavy) but great power plant for the Sport Trac, Explorer, Ranger, hmmmmm Ford 500 maybe?
This is a bit off topic, but take a look at this article. It's interesting to see how many miles you can squeeze out of a diesel engine.
Toyota Ireland - D-4D Clean Power
 
  #51  
Old 04-18-2008, 01:30 PM
parkland's Avatar
parkland
parkland is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
 
  #52  
Old 04-19-2008, 11:59 PM
bookem15's Avatar
bookem15
bookem15 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: E Washington
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by parkland
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
I could not agree more BUT they will not do that HP sells now days. If the people at ford that are going to design these engines had a job that they needed a truck for but did not make the money they make now I would have to say the the MPG's would be more of a concern.
 
  #53  
Old 04-20-2008, 08:19 AM
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by parkland
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

.
Excuse me but our first diesel was a 1985 International 6.9idi with a 59 passenger bus body. It had something like 165 hp and about 320 ft lbs of torque. With a 6.50 to 1 axle you had it reving like a gas engine to go anywhere. It was marginal on power empty, pathetic fully loaded and stay away from the hills. Fuel mileage was an improvement over gas but not that impressive. It never got more than 500 miles without using a quart of oil and consumption got bad enough that IH rerung it just before it went out of warranty around 50,000 miles. It dropped a valve at 100,000 miles and split a cylinder wall. Put a reman engine in it and it had a roller cam follower disintegrate at 50,000 miles. Last I saw the bus it was on its way to salvage yard.
 
  #54  
Old 04-20-2008, 01:13 PM
iwannaford's Avatar
iwannaford
iwannaford is offline
New User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 6.7 cummins is actually 350 H.P and 650 torque
 
  #55  
Old 04-20-2008, 02:56 PM
AndysFords's Avatar
AndysFords
AndysFords is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fitzpatrick Alabama
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The problem with all these new engines is they are trying to squeeze too much MPG and HorsePower out of the same engine, the also choking it down with emissions garbage on top of that.
 
  #56  
Old 04-25-2008, 07:50 PM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Why is Ford hell bent on putting a diesel in the F150 no one wants to buy a diesel now cause of the price, As was said in an earlier post the cost difference in fuel out weighs the mpg increase not to mention the cost for oil changes. I dont want to start anything but I think all this sudden rise in fuel prices the last few years is a ploy by are Almighty Government, to one make money, and to force the going green thing down all our throats. I hate to say it but this whole fuel crisis started on 9/11/01 the price shot up I think 20 or 30 cents cause every one was scared and rushed to the pumps and stores just seems to snow ball from there involving other Global Conflicts. Just makes you wander huh? "It's big s@*t sandwich and we're all gonna take a bite"
 
  #57  
Old 04-25-2008, 09:41 PM
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ncl
Why is Ford hell bent on putting a diesel in the F150 no one wants to buy a diesel now cause of the price, As was said in an earlier post the cost difference in fuel out weighs the mpg increase not to mention the cost for oil changes.
Do you really know how much oil changes will cost on a diesel F150?
 
  #58  
Old 04-26-2008, 08:43 AM
ncl's Avatar
ncl
ncl is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Green Springs, OH
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
No I dont but diesels usually take about twice the amount of oil a gas engine does. My fathers 6.0 stroke takes about 4 gallons of oil so maybe the 4.4 maybe 2.5 to 3 gal maybe.
 
  #59  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:47 AM
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
origcharger is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ncl
No I dont but diesels usually take about twice the amount of oil a gas engine does. My fathers 6.0 stroke takes about 4 gallons of oil so maybe the 4.4 maybe 2.5 to 3 gal maybe.

Our 6.2 GM diesel took 7 quarts.
 
  #60  
Old 04-26-2008, 11:15 PM
kermmydog's Avatar
kermmydog
kermmydog is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western Central NV
Posts: 9,177
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by parkland
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
I also couldn't agree more. I would be nice if Ford built an I-6 that was easy to work on & reliable. I dislike the navstars all of them. The 6.9 early 7.3 weren't too bad.
 


Quick Reply: Ford Developing a New Diesel.....QUICKLY



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.