Notices
3.0L Powerstroke Diesel Discuss the forthcoming 3.0L V6 Ford diesel in the F150

Ford Developing a New Diesel.....QUICKLY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 07:28 PM
  #46  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
manitoba-

Thats a liter. As in 1.22 per LITER.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #47  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 72
From: Blue Hill Township
Club FTE Gold Member
So that would be around $4.61 USD per gallon for gasoline and $4.69 USD per gallon of diesel. I am surprised that they are that close.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #48  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
dont be suprised about nothing man, I recently stopped workin in the oilfield. One thing i'll tell you is that whenever prices go lower, they just stop pumping. they make their own "demand".
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #49  
mnmwhit's Avatar
mnmwhit
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 988
Likes: 1
From: North Pole Alaska
I don't think they would make enough power for the EXPY (too heavy) but great power plant for the Sport Trac, Explorer, Ranger, hmmmmm Ford 500 maybe?

Originally Posted by jmaskew
Here's the specs"
The 2.5L Engine gets 28.7 mpg
The 3.0L Engine gets 26 mpg

Wouldn't these engines be great in the Ford Explorer and the Expedition?
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #50  
jmaskew's Avatar
jmaskew
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 18
From: Henderson, NV
Originally Posted by mnmwhit
I don't think they would make enough power for the EXPY (too heavy) but great power plant for the Sport Trac, Explorer, Ranger, hmmmmm Ford 500 maybe?
This is a bit off topic, but take a look at this article. It's interesting to see how many miles you can squeeze out of a diesel engine.
Toyota Ireland - D-4D Clean Power
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #51  
parkland's Avatar
parkland
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 5
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
 
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #52  
bookem15's Avatar
bookem15
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: E Washington
Originally Posted by parkland
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
I could not agree more BUT they will not do that HP sells now days. If the people at ford that are going to design these engines had a job that they needed a truck for but did not make the money they make now I would have to say the the MPG's would be more of a concern.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 08:19 AM
  #53  
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by parkland
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

.
Excuse me but our first diesel was a 1985 International 6.9idi with a 59 passenger bus body. It had something like 165 hp and about 320 ft lbs of torque. With a 6.50 to 1 axle you had it reving like a gas engine to go anywhere. It was marginal on power empty, pathetic fully loaded and stay away from the hills. Fuel mileage was an improvement over gas but not that impressive. It never got more than 500 miles without using a quart of oil and consumption got bad enough that IH rerung it just before it went out of warranty around 50,000 miles. It dropped a valve at 100,000 miles and split a cylinder wall. Put a reman engine in it and it had a roller cam follower disintegrate at 50,000 miles. Last I saw the bus it was on its way to salvage yard.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #54  
iwannaford's Avatar
iwannaford
New User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
the 6.7 cummins is actually 350 H.P and 650 torque
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #55  
AndysFords's Avatar
AndysFords
Laughing Gas
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 1
From: Fitzpatrick Alabama
The problem with all these new engines is they are trying to squeeze too much MPG and HorsePower out of the same engine, the also choking it down with emissions garbage on top of that.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #56  
ncl's Avatar
ncl
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 10
From: Green Springs, OH
Why is Ford hell bent on putting a diesel in the F150 no one wants to buy a diesel now cause of the price, As was said in an earlier post the cost difference in fuel out weighs the mpg increase not to mention the cost for oil changes. I dont want to start anything but I think all this sudden rise in fuel prices the last few years is a ploy by are Almighty Government, to one make money, and to force the going green thing down all our throats. I hate to say it but this whole fuel crisis started on 9/11/01 the price shot up I think 20 or 30 cents cause every one was scared and rushed to the pumps and stores just seems to snow ball from there involving other Global Conflicts. Just makes you wander huh? "It's big s@*t sandwich and we're all gonna take a bite"
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #57  
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ncl
Why is Ford hell bent on putting a diesel in the F150 no one wants to buy a diesel now cause of the price, As was said in an earlier post the cost difference in fuel out weighs the mpg increase not to mention the cost for oil changes.
Do you really know how much oil changes will cost on a diesel F150?
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #58  
ncl's Avatar
ncl
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 10
From: Green Springs, OH
No I dont but diesels usually take about twice the amount of oil a gas engine does. My fathers 6.0 stroke takes about 4 gallons of oil so maybe the 4.4 maybe 2.5 to 3 gal maybe.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 11:47 AM
  #59  
origcharger's Avatar
origcharger
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ncl
No I dont but diesels usually take about twice the amount of oil a gas engine does. My fathers 6.0 stroke takes about 4 gallons of oil so maybe the 4.4 maybe 2.5 to 3 gal maybe.

Our 6.2 GM diesel took 7 quarts.
 
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #60  
kermmydog's Avatar
kermmydog
Post Fiend
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,176
Likes: 4
From: Western Central NV
Smile

Originally Posted by parkland
Everyone has HP ratings buzzing in their heads nowadays. Look at the old 70 passenger school buses and other large vehicles powered by 6.9idi, 7.3idi, cummins5.9, all had 150-180 hp and they got the job done.

Ford should build a reliable, easy to service engine, that gets good fuel mileage and decent power, but leave the 300+ hp tunes for enthusiasts.
I also couldn't agree more. I would be nice if Ford built an I-6 that was easy to work on & reliable. I dislike the navstars all of them. The 6.9 early 7.3 weren't too bad.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.