When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I was wondering what year Ranger had the narrowest rear axle? Its easier to find these than Toyota rears for my project. It would help if the sizes were known as well, thanks.
To the best of my knowledge, the axle has not changed widths in the Ranger since it's inception.
There are two available, the 7.5" and 8.8". The 7.5" is the less durable of the two, coming in 2.3L and 2.5L Rangers. The 8.8" (or 10 bolt) came in V6 Rangers, Explorers Mustangs, F-150s, etc. It is a quite strong rear-end, capable of supporting the power of even slightly modified small block eights without too much trouble. The Explorer rear-end is the same physical size as the Ranger, but the mounts for suspension and shocks are different. The Explorer and FX4 level 2 Ranger use 31 spline axles, whereas the "normal" 8.8" uses 28 spline axles. Both are rated for the same amount of torque.
The ratios I know of being available are 2.73, 3.08, 3.45, 3.55, 3.73, 4.10, 4.56, and 5.12.
I'm looking for something that can run good with a 302, mainly stock build, thats in an older Mazda B2200, so same size as the Ranger. The mounts don't matter since everything will be cut off anyways. I was looking for a good gear ratio and a measurement from mounting face to mounting face that will fit inside the bedsides.
If you're going with a C6 or similar non-overdrive tranny, stick to a 3.73 or higher (numerically lower). Are you going to do some highway running? If so a 3.55 might be a great idea. If you want around town acceleration and power, go with 4.10 or so.
All depends on what the truck will be used for.
Any Ranger axle will swap right into that B2200 without too much effort. Later ones seem to be 1.5" wider...it's a rumor though, dunno if it's true or not. That would be post-'91.
Its going to be mainly for cruising around with some highway miles, and I'm looking for a good auto tranny with no computer control, know of any that will mate up?
Yes the 4.0L is the only 8.8" equipped vehicle from the factory (some 2.3L/3.0L 4x4s may have them as well).
I believe it was 54" until '91, when it switched to 56".
If you wanna go non-computer controlled auto and don't plan on putting a ton of highway miles on, the C6 is large, but it's basically bulletproof and finding a small block patterned one will not be hard.
The '92-earlier Ranger rear axles were 1.5" narrower than the '93-up. The 8.8" rears started showing up in 1990. The 8.8 first came out in the Ranger in '86, but those were Chassis Cab (incomplete) vehicles only.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.