trans to block shim
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: junction city or
trans to block shim
im putting a 302 into my truck 66 f100
the engine i took out was a 240 3-speed 6 banger there was a shime plate (if that is the correct name for it?)between the trans and block .
now a am useing a 3 speed/od man trans had to get the 157 tooth flywheel and bellhousing im looking for the shim plate but when i call around they are telling me i dont need one is that the case and if so why does the six use one and not the 302.
any help appr. thanx paul
the engine i took out was a 240 3-speed 6 banger there was a shime plate (if that is the correct name for it?)between the trans and block .
now a am useing a 3 speed/od man trans had to get the 157 tooth flywheel and bellhousing im looking for the shim plate but when i call around they are telling me i dont need one is that the case and if so why does the six use one and not the 302.
any help appr. thanx paul
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Both the 240 and the 302 use an engine rear plate, but they are not interchangeable. The correct one for a 302 is half the size of the one for a 240, and is somewhat shaped like a half moon, and has a cutout for the starter. The 302 plate bolts to the block, the crankshaft fits through a round hole in the plate.
Last edited by NumberDummy; Mar 24, 2007 at 01:56 PM.
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 9
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Bill, I think you accidentally typed 302 in place of 240 in your post.
Both 240/300 I-6's used the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 302 V-8's, so if the bellhousing fits either, then the plate should as well. The auto transmissions, needed a removeable cover so that the torque converter nuts could be removed, but all the manual tranmissions I have seen behind these engines had a full plate. Somebody correct me if this is not correct.
Both 240/300 I-6's used the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 302 V-8's, so if the bellhousing fits either, then the plate should as well. The auto transmissions, needed a removeable cover so that the torque converter nuts could be removed, but all the manual tranmissions I have seen behind these engines had a full plate. Somebody correct me if this is not correct.
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Originally Posted by acheda
Bill, I think you accidentally typed 302 in place of 240 in your post.
Both 240/300 I-6's used the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 302 V-8's, so if the bellhousing fits either, then the plate should as well. The auto transmissions, needed a removeable cover so that the torque converter nuts could be removed, but all the manual tranmissions I have seen behind these engines had a full plate. Somebody correct me if this is not correct.
Both 240/300 I-6's used the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 302 V-8's, so if the bellhousing fits either, then the plate should as well. The auto transmissions, needed a removeable cover so that the torque converter nuts could be removed, but all the manual tranmissions I have seen behind these engines had a full plate. Somebody correct me if this is not correct.
D0AZ-7007-A .. Engine rear plate~302
C5AZ-7007-A .. Engine rear Plate~240
Last edited by NumberDummy; Mar 24, 2007 at 10:38 PM.
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 9
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Thanks for correcting me, Bill. I did not mean to imply an error on your part, but only wanted to say that the hole-pattern in either plate was the same. I guess you could cut the bottom off a full plate if you wanted it to be more correct, by the book.
I notice your 302 number is a D0..., so the factory must have used that as the replacement for older plates on the 302's. I know I have seen full-plates on some of these engines - perhaps 260's or 289's.
I notice your 302 number is a D0..., so the factory must have used that as the replacement for older plates on the 302's. I know I have seen full-plates on some of these engines - perhaps 260's or 289's.
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 9
From: San Luis Obispo, CA
Ford put plates between the bellhousing & block on most (all?) 302's. There is probably enough tolerance to put it together with or without the plate. I still think you can use the plate you have from your six, either as it is or with the bottom cut off. Others may be able to say that they have left the plate out with no problem, but I have always put them back in.
Trending Topics
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 289
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
I have a 302 plate for a manual transmission that you can have for shipping fee alone. Just PM me.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jade79
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
8
Aug 27, 2020 07:24 PM
Jim Masters
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
Jul 4, 2020 11:26 AM
Rowberryade
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
Sep 24, 2015 08:56 PM
mad scientist:p
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
14
Apr 24, 2007 11:23 PM
