Rebuilding 429
First sorry for possible bad english, because I am from Holland (a small country in Europe). But I do my best!
I am re-building the engine and I have some questions about this.
The engine:
Block: 429 cui (castingnumber: D1VE-6015 AA)
Cylinderheads: C8VE-E (original heads we’re D2VE, but I replaced that)
Questions:
1.
I have the following set-up in mind:
I have a Edelbrock Performer Cam and the Edelbrock lifters.
Rocker Arms are from Competition Cams Magnum Steel Roller Tip Rockers (CCA-1411-16).
I know that the standard pushrods of the C8VE-E heads are 5/16 and 8,550 (source is this forum!), but I have now 3/8, 8,68 (Competition Cams/ Magnum).
Is this combination good (especially pay attention to the pushrods, because I read different things about this size I must use).
When I have a test set-up I experienced some space/ clearence between the Rocker-arm and the valve, is this gonna disapear, because of the Edelbrock lifters? So not, I have rocker-arm studs size 3/8 on the heads, what kind of rocker arm stud nut I must use and can I use Rocker Arm Adjusters for fill up the space/ clearence?
Is there anything else about this detail I must pay attention?
2.
What kind of guideplates I can use? I have in mind the FRPP M-6566-E429 or the Trick Flow TFS-54400623.
If you need more information, please let me know! Every help is welcome.
Tim
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ushrod_length/
There are a few different Edelbrock cams so we need a part # to go with it. In most cases unless you are running a big cam with a lot of valve spring pressure you don't need to upgrade to 3/8" pushrods.
Thanks for your reaction! I've learned a lot of the article you send (I certainly are going to check this on my engine). The problem of the space/ clearence between the Rocker-arm and the valve is solved, I've used the wrong Rocker Arm Adjusting Nuts (the one we used were flat on the bottom), so the Rocker Arm was not deep enough on the rocker-arm stud.
By the way, the part number of the cam and hydraulic lifters is: EDL-2167 (Edelbrock).
Another question:
I noticed that some of the cam lobes are not fully directly under the hydraulic lifters (in the worst case only a few inches), is this a problem? We have checked the old original cam and the cam lobes were in exact the position of the cam lobes of the new cam. Also the old cam has the same "runningmarks" (I don't know of this word is correct?).
This was the question:
I noticed that some of the cam lobes are not fully directly under the hydraulic lifters (in the worst case only a few inches), is this a problem? We have checked the old original cam and the cam lobes were in exact the position of the cam lobes of the new cam. Also the old cam has the same "pattern".
Explore the site I posted above to find a bunch of useful info in the "Technical Article" link on the left side of the webpage. Here are a few links that I think may help explain in some detail things you should know.
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...amshaft_basic/
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ding_mistakes/
http://www.carcraft.com/howto/116_03..._engine_build/
The cam your using has a max lift of .480 on the exhaust side. A set of hardened 5/16 pushrods will be more then enough to handle the load. I run a cam with .565 of lift with no problems.
Thanks again. I've forgot to mention it, but the cam lobes are not directly in left and right position under the lifters (seen from above). In my opinion we can't put the cam further or back into the engineblock?
Thanks for the tip of lubrication the cam lobes, we did this, with the lubricant Edelbrock supplied with the cam (MoS2 lube, "red stuff").




