Need More Ground Clearance
I see that many drivers have gone to larger diameter wheels rather than just taller 16". Is there a benefit to 17, 18, 19.5, 20, 22 inch wheels over 16s? I guess with the 19.5 inch the tire options extend into the f and g load capacities. What other advantage are there? For example, if I went to a 20 inch wheel could I run 9X20 military tires on a Super Duty (assuming enough lift for clearance)? I have 9X20s on a 1942 Chevy 1 1/2 ton 4X4 and am very happy with their mud and snow capabilities.
Do 20 inch wheels require an adapter from the wheel hub to the bolt pattern of the 20 inch wheel?
I think your logic is good about a taller tire but unless you install a lift I don't think a 35" tire will fit. A 33" isn't going to get you much over the 265. According to the Procomp tire chart a 265/75-16 is 31.6 in diameter so a 33 is only 1.4" larger in diameter. For reference, the Procomp 35/12.50-16 has a 3195lb load rating and the 35/12.50-17 has 3000lb rating.
The Procomp chart may be helpful
http://www.procomptires.com/allterrain.html#
The people that go with large diameter wheels like the looks I think.
Michael
Thanks for the info. Th truck has lots of clearance as I resprung it with three leaves in the front and five in the back. Each leaf is 13/32 thick. I have no idea what they came out of. The result is 14 inches from the top of the rear wheel to the wheel well "fender" in back and 9 nches in front. This is with no payload. ALthough, with 3,300 pound of ceramic floor tile, the springs barely moved. The bottom line is there ought to be plenty of room for a taller tire.
I have no problem with a 34 or 35 inch tire on a 16 inch wheel. I just wondered if I was missing something with the smaller sidewall tires (70s) on a larger diameter wheel. I guess the answer is not much from a working standpoint.
On the other hand, if I could run 9X20 milspec tires, that would look cool, although the ride at 80 MPH might be a tad bumpy.




