Notices
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator Discussion

supercharger swap complete

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2007 | 09:01 AM
  #1  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
supercharger swap complete

loaded the tune from my tuner, and the truck runs. idle is high...around 2800, but we are fixing that. fyi, for those considering this on 03+ models, there are lots of differences than on the 97-02 models. will take pics soon. only driven it to thew gas station and back to work, so no real results yet. i have an appt to be dyno-tuned monday at 1:30. you can view the session live here: http://www.performance-dyno.com
 

Last edited by 04markIII; Feb 3, 2007 at 09:04 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 02:39 PM
  #2  
phil6608's Avatar
phil6608
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,157
Likes: 0
From: Stanton DE
Thumbs up

So what kind of supercharger did you swap?
oh I see it in your sig now. Hows it running?
Phil
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #3  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
running better now. the high idle was due to a broken canister vent valve. we put a similar one in for now so it could be driven. i havent opened it up yet, per instructions from my tuner. he said wait until he dyno-tunes it monday. the truck seems thirsty(even with babying the gas)....but im sure that will be somewhat corrected on the dyno. will post result for those who dont watch live.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #4  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
end results: more power, better mpg(as high as 20.4 before traffic), and a lot bigger smile! tuner said i could see about 75 more hp with an open intake and dual exhaust, but i am quite satisfied with the truck the way it is.


 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #5  
dirtriderdan's Avatar
dirtriderdan
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: IL
Hey Congrats

Those are flywheel numbers right? What loss factor did you use? What are the max on each. Looks about 450 torque and 340 hp which is right about what the HD puts out. Did you use the same pulleys as the HD? Why 15:1 air/fuel until 3000 rpm? I'm guessing it doesn't build boost until then but is it normally that lean stock?

Did you end up making a document with all the parts and modifications you had to make? Pictures during the process? Anything more I can get from you would be great as I'll be doing this project too and it is the exact same vehicle. Thanks!

What did the whole project end up costing you?
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2007 | 09:07 PM
  #6  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
those are the rear wheel numbers, not the crank.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #7  
dirtriderdan's Avatar
dirtriderdan
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: IL
Originally Posted by 04markIII
those are the rear wheel numbers, not the crank.
I see that now that you added it to your sig with numbers. That looks great then. Do you know what stock rwhp and torque would be? At the flywheel it is 260hp and 350lb-ft so I'd assume about 22% loss or so. Just curious if you dyno'd beforehand or have seen anyone who did because we know it can be far from published numbers. I think the harley davidson f150 was only published to have 340hp at the flywheel and that has to be underrated with the numbers you are showing.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 12:08 PM
  #8  
phil6608's Avatar
phil6608
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,157
Likes: 0
From: Stanton DE
Originally Posted by dan_s_johnson
I see that now that you added it to your sig with numbers. That looks great then. Do you know what stock rwhp and torque would be? At the flywheel it is 260hp and 350lb-ft so I'd assume about 22% loss or so. Just curious if you dyno'd beforehand or have seen anyone who did because we know it can be far from published numbers. I think the harley davidson f150 was only published to have 340hp at the flywheel and that has to be underrated with the numbers you are showing.
He has a 6# lower pulley so hes going to make way more power then a stock Harley!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #9  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
stock should be about 185hp at the wheels according to my tuner. i added a 6lb lower pulley, aftermarket exhaust and a panel filter, which is why my numbers are higher than a stock harley. stock harleys are 340 at the crank, and the lightnings 380(based on '03 MY)
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #10  
dirtriderdan's Avatar
dirtriderdan
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: IL
Forgive my ignorance. I still have a lot to learn with all this. Basic questions... So this 6# pulley is the pulley on the crank right? Does that mean 6 lbs? What is the stock one? Is it a weight difference from the damper and/or a size difference? Size difference would change the psi of boost right? What psi are your running?
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 02:16 PM
  #11  
hotstang's Avatar
hotstang
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, va
Where and how much?

Where did you find the supercharger (and all of the parts) and how much. Those are some impressive #s.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 02:56 PM
  #12  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
Originally Posted by hotstang
Where did you find the supercharger (and all of the parts) and how much. Those are some impressive #s.
you should come to the meet this sunday in nh. you can see it in person. i bought the s/c setup from ebay($1,550 shipped), and the rest of the stuff from mad enterprises(about $2,200, but some parts being returned). i am happy with the outcome!
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 03:00 PM
  #13  
04markIII's Avatar
04markIII
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
From: Lunenburg, MA
Originally Posted by dan_s_johnson
Forgive my ignorance. I still have a lot to learn with all this. Basic questions... So this 6# pulley is the pulley on the crank right? Does that mean 6 lbs? What is the stock one? Is it a weight difference from the damper and/or a size difference? Size difference would change the psi of boost right? What psi are your running?
i believe the 6lb pulley means that it adds 6lbs of additional boost due to the size(not sure if bigger or smaller!). it does bolt to your crank pulley. there is a 4, 6, and 8 lb option....i went mid, which should be 12 lbs boost total.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #14  
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 24,724
Likes: 74
From: Blue Hill Township
A smaller supercharger pulley = more boost
A larger supercharger pulley = less boost

A smaller crank pulley = less boost
A larger crank pulley = more boost
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #15  
dirtriderdan's Avatar
dirtriderdan
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: IL
Originally Posted by 04markIII
i believe the 6lb pulley means that it adds 6lbs of additional boost due to the size(not sure if bigger or smaller!). it does bolt to your crank pulley. there is a 4, 6, and 8 lb option....i went mid, which should be 12 lbs boost total.

That explains the numbers then...it is a bigger pulley. 12lb boost is the highest I've heard of on this type of swap. They say it is all about a good tune though...

Does anyone know what our 4r70w is rated for? If memory serves it was something like 506ft-lbs torque. I assume that would be a crank number in which case you are a bit over. Doing anything to your tranny? Factory Tech has a separator plate for us now for only $85 in the place of the former 3 times as much valve body. I'll probably go with that and I'll be running 8psi from a stock lighnting setup.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE