Notices

Recommendation...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 04:56 AM
  #1  
Jrock909's Avatar
Jrock909
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Recommendation...

Will the stock valve springs hold up to a 35-349-8 Comp Cam or should I go ahead and spring for new springs also.... I was told that this is the best cam for the buck that you can put in a early roller cam motor? I drive a 1992 Ford F-150 302EFI+E4OD combo and I was told that I have a roller motor in which ford used the small base hydraulic roller cam which really needs to be upgraded anyways... I am looking for all the performance I can get out of my SB 302 and I thought a cam would definitely be the way to go? Being that the truck is not a daily driver and is more of a pleasure toy to drive I really don't care about reliability for the most part, really like to squeeze the most I can out of the motor itself and drive along. Figured with the current setup I have now running 33 inch mud tires and I regeared last year to 4.10's all around be a pretty killer combination with the 35-349-8 cam from Comp Cams as recommended by Conanski here on the board!

What do you guys think honestly what should I do,
Jason
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #2  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
I have a roller motor in which ford used the small base hydraulic roller cam



it's not a small base circle cam, should just be a regular old roller cam.

and I would get the springs they are cheap.................
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 05:32 AM
  #3  
Jrock909's Avatar
Jrock909
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Hey Hemi, is it even worth sticking another cam in my 92 F-150 302EFI motor... I mean the cam is $264.00 and valve springs will probably bring the total over $300+ is it worth it man....
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 05:40 AM
  #4  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
HP=$

How fast do you want to spend..........
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 05:42 AM
  #5  
Jrock909's Avatar
Jrock909
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Well I really don't want to give up 3mpg in my lifted ford just for a cam upgrade and with the cam upgrade it will probably rob me of the mileage I like currently? I would really only like to get 300hp of my motor and maybe 350 ft/lb's of torque that should be cheap enough what you think?
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 05:52 AM
  #6  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
300 hp in a 302 will cost you money and milage.... My truck pulled 234 @ the wheels...about 300 @ the flywheel. look at my dyno vid, on that page is my combo, small 270S comp cam with ported E7 heads with bigger valves. I got 8 MPG with that combo......after i changed from 4.56 to 3.55 gears.......

here is my combo
302 stock bore and loose holed, should have been bored
Iron E7 heads 1.94 1.60 Ported
5.0 stock forged piston 0 deck
9.5 to 1
Comp Cams 270S solid flat 224 224 @ .050 500 lift
Comps dual springs
Comps roller tip rail type rockers
Performer RPM intake
Holley 650DP, 69 primarys 74 secondarys, 31 pri squirter 25 sec squirter
Duraspark msd 6A
HV pump
APR pump shaft, rod bolts, head bolts
Motorsport windage tray

C6 with E4OD gear set
Small stall 2000
Shift kit
Not sure what transfer case I have????
9" 31 spline posi 4.56
31" tires
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #7  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by Jrock909
Well I really don't want to give up 3mpg in my lifted ford just for a cam upgrade and with the cam upgrade it will probably rob me of the mileage I like currently? I would really only like to get 300hp of my motor and maybe 350 ft/lb's of torque that should be cheap enough what you think?
What makes you think you'll loose 3mpg with this cam? If you're flooring it, it'll make more power than the stock motor, and HP requires fuel, simple. But if you're just cruising around, the cammed motor will make more low rpm torque, so that milage will be better than stock.

Either way.. there's no danger of the 302 making 350 ft/lbs of torque unless you stroke it, add a blower, or bump the compression to 11:1. The cheaper way to get there is to install a 351. Whatever way you get to 300hp, it's going to cost you fuel when you're using it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #8  
P51D Mustang's Avatar
P51D Mustang
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
302's with the right aftermarket heads can easily make 350 lb-ft of tourqe at 9 to 10:1 compression. No stroker kits required.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 07:28 PM
  #9  
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11,141
Likes: 25
From: south louisiana
Originally Posted by HemiEater
I have a roller motor in which ford used the small base hydraulic roller cam



it's not a small base circle cam, should just be a regular old roller cam.

and I would get the springs they are cheap.................
He wasn't referring to it as a small base circle cam, but rather the smallest "base" roller cam Ford used in the roller 5.0's. Ford referred to it as the "base" roller.
 
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 07:36 PM
  #10  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by P51D Mustang
302's with the right aftermarket heads can easily make 350 lb-ft of tourqe at 9 to 10:1 compression. No stroker kits required.

sure can but it will be in the 4000 to 4500 rpm range
 
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 10:05 AM
  #11  
P51D Mustang's Avatar
P51D Mustang
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
So it is with a 351w as well, once you get enough cam and head to get 350+ lb-ft from the 351.

A 351 with E7 type heads makes as much as about 325-330 lb-ft, and no more than 320 HP max.

A 351w with GT40 Cobra heads and a cam makes 360 lb-ft at 4250 rpm (345 HP).

A 351w with GT40Y heads and a cam makes 375 lb-ft at 4500 rpm (385 HP).

A 302 with TFS heads and a cam makes 370 lb-ft at 4500 rpm.

A stock 351w is a cheaper alternative for a little more low end tourqe than a near stock 302, but a near stock 351w is not eqivilant to a properly built 302, in any way. It still takes heads and a cam to get the 351 to match or exceed a well built 302, and it still takes some rpm. If a guy already has a 302, it will be better and less expensive to build up the 302, rather than swap in a stock level 351w, if 350+ lb-ft of tourqe is the goal.
 

Last edited by P51D Mustang; Jan 9, 2007 at 10:11 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #12  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
funny thing is they both have the same head on-um.......
fords better idea
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE