Gain 110 HP , 220 Ft/ Lb.s for under $400???? BS or real?
#16
Originally Posted by Btravelen
More power should require less throttle to get it going and keep it going. Likely though, if you can't keep your foot out of it.
Actually pretty much every supercharged engine I have seen gets like 50% less fuel economy then simmilar sized engines that are not supercharged.
#18
#19
I'd like to see objective evidence that supercharged engines get 50% less fuel mileage, provided they're driven the same way as non supercharged vehicles. Stuffing more air in it requires more fuel and produces more power. To get the vehicle moving and to keep it moving should require less throttle. Theoretically.
All the chip/tuners claim better mileage by 'adding more fuel'. IF YOU CAN KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF IT.
All the chip/tuners claim better mileage by 'adding more fuel'. IF YOU CAN KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF IT.
#20
Originally Posted by Btravelen
I'd like to see objective evidence that supercharged engines get 50% less fuel mileage, provided they're driven the same way as non supercharged vehicles. Stuffing more air in it requires more fuel and produces more power. To get the vehicle moving and to keep it moving should require less throttle. Theoretically.
All the chip/tuners claim better mileage by 'adding more fuel'. IF YOU CAN KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF IT.
All the chip/tuners claim better mileage by 'adding more fuel'. IF YOU CAN KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF IT.
Sure. I work on at least 3 different vehicle every day. The newer Pontiac Grand Am / Prix's have MPG gauges on many of them. Well the supercharged ones that roll into the shop are sitting at like 13 - 17 MPG on the gauge on average. The non-supercharged ones roll around 18 - 23 MPG on average. And I have probably worked on a good 10+ of them by now. And they use the same engines.
#21
Originally Posted by SPL Tech
Well cold air intakes alow the engine to consume more air and I have never seen a CAI that does not improve fuel economy let alone reduce it.
A supercharged engine will normally have a lower MPG reading than a NA engine even when not on the boost because the engine has to still spin the SC.
Once on the boost...well, you just can't get more power without more fuel.
But the less pedal idea certainly has merit.
#24
Originally Posted by Monsta
A CAI may increase MPG for those vehicles that are severly choked due to noise emission and space considerations. This is due to reducing pumping losses. They may also increase MPG at WOT but who really cares abou that. :X-10 That's really where you see the biggest performance difference with a CAI anyway.
#26
#27
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F250army45d
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
4
06-27-2010 05:40 PM