Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gain 110 HP , 220 Ft/ Lb.s for under $400???? BS or real?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-06-2007, 11:18 PM
SPL Tech's Avatar
SPL Tech
SPL Tech is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Btravelen
More power should require less throttle to get it going and keep it going. Likely though, if you can't keep your foot out of it.
Then why do the Poniacs that come stock with superchargers get like half the fuel economy as the ones that don’t have the superchargers (same engine)?





Actually pretty much every supercharged engine I have seen gets like 50% less fuel economy then simmilar sized engines that are not supercharged.
 
  #17  
Old 01-07-2007, 10:42 AM
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Monsta is offline
Sit. Stay.

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Stuffing more air in it requires that you add more fuel.
 
  #18  
Old 01-07-2007, 05:00 PM
SPL Tech's Avatar
SPL Tech
SPL Tech is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsta
Stuffing more air in it requires that you add more fuel.
Well cold air intakes alow the engine to consume more air and I have never seen a CAI that does not improve fuel economy let alone reduce it.
 
  #19  
Old 01-07-2007, 05:07 PM
Btravelen's Avatar
Btravelen
Btravelen is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like to see objective evidence that supercharged engines get 50% less fuel mileage, provided they're driven the same way as non supercharged vehicles. Stuffing more air in it requires more fuel and produces more power. To get the vehicle moving and to keep it moving should require less throttle. Theoretically.

All the chip/tuners claim better mileage by 'adding more fuel'. IF YOU CAN KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF IT.
 
  #20  
Old 01-07-2007, 05:37 PM
SPL Tech's Avatar
SPL Tech
SPL Tech is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Btravelen
I'd like to see objective evidence that supercharged engines get 50% less fuel mileage, provided they're driven the same way as non supercharged vehicles. Stuffing more air in it requires more fuel and produces more power. To get the vehicle moving and to keep it moving should require less throttle. Theoretically.

All the chip/tuners claim better mileage by 'adding more fuel'. IF YOU CAN KEEP YOUR FOOT OUT OF IT.

Sure. I work on at least 3 different vehicle every day. The newer Pontiac Grand Am / Prix's have MPG gauges on many of them. Well the supercharged ones that roll into the shop are sitting at like 13 - 17 MPG on the gauge on average. The non-supercharged ones roll around 18 - 23 MPG on average. And I have probably worked on a good 10+ of them by now. And they use the same engines.

 
  #21  
Old 01-07-2007, 10:35 PM
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Monsta is offline
Sit. Stay.

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by SPL Tech
Well cold air intakes alow the engine to consume more air and I have never seen a CAI that does not improve fuel economy let alone reduce it.
A CAI may increase MPG for those vehicles that are severly choked due to noise emission and space considerations. This is due to reducing pumping losses. They may also increase MPG at WOT but who really cares abou that. :X-10 That's really where you see the biggest performance difference with a CAI anyway.

A supercharged engine will normally have a lower MPG reading than a NA engine even when not on the boost because the engine has to still spin the SC.

Once on the boost...well, you just can't get more power without more fuel.

But the less pedal idea certainly has merit.
 
  #22  
Old 01-07-2007, 11:10 PM
SPL Tech's Avatar
SPL Tech
SPL Tech is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whats WOT?
 
  #23  
Old 01-07-2007, 11:34 PM
afreemanmd's Avatar
afreemanmd
afreemanmd is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOT = Wide Open Throttle
 
  #24  
Old 01-08-2007, 12:55 AM
SPL Tech's Avatar
SPL Tech
SPL Tech is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Monsta
A CAI may increase MPG for those vehicles that are severly choked due to noise emission and space considerations. This is due to reducing pumping losses. They may also increase MPG at WOT but who really cares abou that. :X-10 That's really where you see the biggest performance difference with a CAI anyway.
So are you saying in some vehicle a CAI can reduce fuel efficency? Because I was thinking of a CAI for my new X but it would be mainly to gain more fuel economy.
 
  #25  
Old 01-08-2007, 01:06 AM
RACERX7775's Avatar
RACERX7775
RACERX7775 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: WARRINGTON, PA
Posts: 3,620
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Question

just curious, how long have you been a tech for? and you work on pontiacs? and your asking what WOT is? start reading the shop manuals...
 
  #26  
Old 01-08-2007, 02:25 AM
SPL Tech's Avatar
SPL Tech
SPL Tech is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am a car audio tech not a automotive tech. SPL stands for Sound Pressure Level. I install remote starters, aftermerket mobile electronics, and I do custom car audio fabrication / modifications.

 

Last edited by SPL Tech; 01-08-2007 at 02:28 AM.
  #27  
Old 01-08-2007, 12:46 PM
Monsta's Avatar
Monsta
Monsta is offline
Sit. Stay.

Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington State
Posts: 18,308
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by SPL Tech
So are you saying in some vehicle a CAI can reduce fuel efficency? Because I was thinking of a CAI for my new X but it would be mainly to gain more fuel economy.
Never in my statements did I claim that they could REDUCE MPG.
 
  #28  
Old 01-08-2007, 10:19 PM
Btravelen's Avatar
Btravelen
Btravelen is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sheesh!!!!!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xTraveler
Excursion - King of SUVs
762
02-27-2024 08:28 AM
F250army45d
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
4
06-27-2010 05:40 PM
crazyredneckanyhow
Arkansas Chapter
2
02-24-2008 12:00 AM
Goober1979
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
4
01-12-2007 05:01 PM
Jebadiah04
Florida Chapter
28
04-23-2006 09:46 PM



Quick Reply: Gain 110 HP , 220 Ft/ Lb.s for under $400???? BS or real?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.