Notices

rebuilt engine, horrible mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #1  
bhbh's Avatar
bhbh
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Unhappy rebuilt engine, horrible mpg

Hello all...
I am in the break-in stage of a rebuilt 300 in a 1987 f-150 efi (400 miles total). Starts, idles, and runs wonderfully, even in these cold mornings. Seems to have plenty of power, although I have nothing to compare it to because this is my first 300. My only problem is fuel economy. I'm getting ~10 mpg, seems I can watch the gas gauge dropping no matter how I drive. Here are some facts:

About 200 miles ago, pulled codes 33 (egr) & 41 (lean condition) from KOER. Replaced 02 sensor, didn't help. Checked EVP sensor, it was shot so I replaced it, code 33 was gone but code 41 remained. Found that egr valve was rusted shut, and had a massive vacuum leak. Replaced egr valve, code 41 disappeared but code 34 (egr closed voltage too high) popped up, which is now the only remaining code at both KOEO and KOER. More on that later.

So with no code 41, no other vacuum leaks found, a new 02 sensor, new plugs, wires, distributor cap, rotor, etc. I was hoping for mpg to shoot up to at least 15-16 combined. No such luck after ~200 miles.

So here is my question... could prolonged gas guzzling related to the vacuum leak (during I don't know how many years) have led to a restricted cat problem? I don't seem to lack any power on the highway, but again, I don't really have a reference point.

Reason I ask is that immediately after KOER tests, there was a small puddle of oil right under the front balancer seal. I had the idea that maybe the act of revving the engine during KOER tests led to excessive backpressure from clogged cats, leading to excessive crankcase pressure (?), leading to oil oozing from the seal? It didn't leak before that time, hasn't leaked since.

About the code 34... Found that code 34 is probably because max (closed) resistance on my new EVP sensor is 4000 ohms, and manual says 5000 is spec. I measured 4 or 5 new sensors of varying brands and none had a max resistance higher than 4200 ohms. Guess I'll have to live with it if it's no detriment.

Anyway, any ideas as to why she's sucking so much gas?

Thanks for bearing with me...
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2006 | 05:13 AM
  #2  
doehnter's Avatar
doehnter
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Good luck,thats why we get rid of all that smog crap.Most 300's if built right will run cleaner without.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 05:40 PM
  #3  
doodaa's Avatar
doodaa
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
I'd discount the clogged cat theory. Any significant restriction in the exhaust will show up more as acceleration goes up and you say the power is ok on the highway. Last time a cat clogged on me I couldn't get it to run fast enough to get on the highway.

I'm not real good with EFI systems from any era and especially not the older ones but I'd look at the MAF sensor (or whatever sensor tells the computer how much air is coming in) and the oxygen sensors (or whatever tells the computer how lean or rich it's running - the output).

Also, and again I'm tossing an idea here, the computer may not be getting to "closed loop" mode. If it thinks, or can't determine, if the engine is still warming up (EGR should only open during warm up) it may be running rich just as a safety measure. Maybe a temp sensor in there too?

Or it could be as simple as a loose or broken wire from when the engine was installed... where to start looking for that? Everywhere.
 

Last edited by doodaa; Dec 12, 2006 at 05:45 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #4  
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Postmaster
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 9
From: La Verne, California
It could also be that it's a rather Tight re-build & will improve after an extented break-in period.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 10
From: Spokane, WA
I would say that at only 400 miles it is not near broke in yet. Most of my experience with rebuilts are in "Large Cars". My Cummins N14 didn't break in until about 70,000 miles...which is about normal for a large diesel car. I would think your engine should be fairly well broke in somewhere between 1,000-3,000 miles?
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
javi2001's Avatar
javi2001
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 1
From: Venezuela
1.000 to 3.000 will be enought, it depends on waht parts were used, Ford OEM or aftermarket AND it depends also on machine shop job.

By the way, N14 break-in over 5.000????
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #7  
Harte3's Avatar
Harte3
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,603
Likes: 10
From: Spokane, WA
The N-14 finally loosened up about 70K. Had an In-frame done on it at 867K and it loosened up at about 60k. The ISX 565 in the "Petercar" I am driving now about the same. Drove a CAT 3406 set at 350hp that was rebuilt. The boss kicked another driver out of it because it was really tight and he was dropping gears and running around against the governor at 2100 RPM all day with it...Sheesh! Not the way to treat a $10,000 rebuilt engine. It went about 60k before it loosened up.
I was raised in the days before non-detergent oil when new cars were "babied" during the break-in period. Todays rebuilds still need a little break-in before they start running right unlike the engines of yesteryear that required quite a few easy miles to break-in.
 

Last edited by Harte3; Dec 18, 2006 at 03:53 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #8  
tomw's Avatar
tomw
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,907
Likes: 39
From: suburban atlanta
Crankcase pressure is not related to the cat. The blowby amount, the PCV, hoses and ports to the intake will affect crankcase pressure.
If you have a sticky injector or two you might get poor mileage, but not be off enough to throw a 'rich' code. Check the fuel regulator pressure, and watch for pressure leakdown after pump shutoff. Pressure *should* stay up overnight.
You've fixed all the 'sparky' things that kill mpg. So, look at the air- filter, and fuel-injectors and pressure. Did you put in a 195deg thermostat?

You could put a 1K resistor in series with the line back to the ECM to fudge the value up to the 5k it wants to see.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #9  
bhbh's Avatar
bhbh
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thanks for the replies. I'll do the fuel pressure test and be a little more patient with the break-in. Air filter is new, tstat is a new 195 deg. As for the series resistor, wouldn't that cause problems at the other end of the spec (100 ohm at open is now 1100 ohm)?
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE