Notices

2V vs 4V Pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #1  
sabre62's Avatar
sabre62
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Post 2V vs 4V Pistons

In a 289 engine the pistons are dished for less compression in a 2V engine as opposed to a 4V which has flat tops (except in D engines) does this apply to Clevelands? I have not had a 2V engine down to verify.. Thanks Gordon
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #2  
grclark351's Avatar
grclark351
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 2
From: chicago burbs
the 4V's got different pistons depending upon the heads, the year, and if it was a Boss, HO, CJ or base 4V. lots of different pistons, forged, cast, F/T, dome...

not sure if the 2V's had a small dish or not? i have talked to a couple guys that refer to the early(up to about 71 or 72) 2V's being higher compression than the later smog model years. not much of a difference as i recall and with the same chamber, so could've been a piston dish? none of my reference material supports this though...
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #3  
sabre62's Avatar
sabre62
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Re:2V vs 4V Pistons

Thanks My 4V is a base 71 Torino, I knew that the later heads were bigger chamber I would guess that these heads are around 60cc. I need to look at a 70-71 2V motor and see what the pistons look like as mine are dead flat with small valve relief at the edge. Gordon
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #4  
danlee's Avatar
danlee
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
According to Tom Monroe's book, the '70 to '74 351C-2V heads had 76.2cc open combustion chamber. The later 351C-CJ and H.O. had the 4V ports, but open 75.4cc heads. The '70 and '71 351C-4V had the 62.8cc closed chamber heads and the large ports. The '71 351C Boss had 66.1cc heads with a dome piston, which gave it 11:1.

It appears that the piston was the same between the 351C-4V and the 351C-2V in the early motors. It is the head that makes the difference, but the compression ratios published in the book do not agree with the calculated CRs for either case. I believe that the book has some errors.

The '71 351C-4V has flattop pistons with valve relief. All of those early pistons were flattops, except for the Boss. They did change the Compression Height on some.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #5  
grclark351's Avatar
grclark351
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 2
From: chicago burbs
"I believe that the book has some errors."

quoting from that book has bit me in the butt more than a couple times! still a good reference in general though.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 12:20 AM
  #6  
Torque1st's Avatar
Torque1st
Posting Legend
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 30,255
Likes: 37
-And that book is SOOO out of date...

But it is still worth having in the old library.
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 05:55 AM
  #7  
sabre62's Avatar
sabre62
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thank You Gentlemen, I need to get that book, I have learned that the CJ engine had the cam degreed in slightly retarded in the later year and that would affect the compression ratio. The Aussie heads (Ihave a set) are 58-59cc and yield a 10.1-10.5 compression.These heads were manufactured for 302's and will bolt on 351's(same basic block down there) however the increase in stroke raises the compression up to the aforementioned compression ratio. I am building a street motor looking for power at the bottom and the ability to use pump gas. Aus Ford parts claim their heads simply need premium fuel and will operate fine, I do not know what advance they are able to run timing wise.Do any of you have experience with the newer Edelbrock aluminum heads? Regards Gordon
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 06:40 AM
  #8  
danlee's Avatar
danlee
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
What motor do you have?
If it is a '71 Torino 351C-4V, it should have the closed chamber heads. You should keep those heads. If you have the CJ heads, then a good set of Aussies or alloy heads will help.

Retarding the cam reduces the Dynamic Compression Ratio, by reducing the swept volume of the cylinder after the intake valve has closed. A cam with a late Intake Valve Closing angle will have the same affect. You should use a cam with an IVC no earlier than 66 degrees ABDC with 58cc heads. With 64cc alloy heads you can have a cam with an IVC of 58 degrees ABDC. The early valve closing improves the torque at low RPM. This is better for a street motor.

What cam are you planning to use?

Alloy heads will allow you to have at least 0.5 points higher compression ratio without detonation. The Edelbrock heads are OK, but the best are the Cilinder Head Innovations heads. Check out this site.

http://www.tmeyerinc.com/351Caluminumheads.htm

These heads flow so good, that you can use a shorter duration cam and still get great power at high RPM.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 06:30 PM
  #9  
sabre62's Avatar
sabre62
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Interesting. My cam would probably be the Comp extreme energy 270H.I think that is the number. I have this in 5.0 and it is great for the street motor I have in 66 Mustang Conv. with AOD. Gordon
 
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #10  
danlee's Avatar
danlee
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by sabre62
Interesting. My cam would probably be the Comp extreme energy 270H.I think that is the number. I have this in 5.0 and it is great for the street motor I have in 66 Mustang Conv. with AOD. Gordon
I prefer the Dual Energy cams, like the 265DEH or the 275DEH. The IVC of the 270H is 61 degrees ABDC, while the IVC of the 265DEH is 58.5 degrees ABDC, and the 275DEH is 63.5 degrees ABDC.

With a 58cc head and a 61 degree IVC, the Dynamic CR will be 8.78:1. That is too high for pump fuel. Even with 63.5 degree IVC, the Dynamic CR is still 8.62:1, also too high for pump fuel.

With a 64cc head, and a 63.5 degree IVC, the DCR is 8.05:1, and with a 61 degree IVC, it is 8.2:1. This should run with 93 Octane fuel. With the 64cc alloy heads you could even run the 265DEH cam and 58.5 degree IVC. The DCR is 8.34:1.
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 04:42 AM
  #11  
sabre62's Avatar
sabre62
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Excellant, This is the info I needed, I am thinking the Aussie heads would make a good clevor 302-289 hi-po type for a play car ..not everyday use as I planned for this Ranchero. Thanks for the good insight. Gordon
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #12  
danlee's Avatar
danlee
Postmaster
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 5
From: Delaware
Try this link.

www.edyno.com
 
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 03:20 PM
  #13  
grclark351's Avatar
grclark351
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 2
From: chicago burbs
Aussie heads on a 302 would make what they call a "baby boss", 2V heads instead of 4V. the B&A manifolds might be the only option for a baby boss?
 
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2006 | 02:45 AM
  #14  
Brian S's Avatar
Brian S
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
"the B&A manifolds might be the only option for a baby boss?"

Check with the latest Edelbrock catalog. http://www.edelbrock.com/images/home/new_products.pdf
I saw a couple new intake manifold descriptions for a 302 or 351W application using 2V/4V Cleveland heads. 1500-6500rpm, no pics available yet.
 

Last edited by Brian S; Nov 30, 2006 at 02:59 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GermanMike
Modular V10 (6.8l)
12
Feb 10, 2025 01:54 PM
rsheffield
1997 - 2003 F150
9
Dec 29, 2013 11:25 AM
Dobies4life
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
14
May 23, 2013 05:16 AM
mikeo0o0o0
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
3
Aug 17, 2011 06:14 PM
sonic7
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
Jun 25, 2004 08:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 PM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE