Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Jet MAF sensor ugrade issues?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #1  
jdhudall's Avatar
jdhudall
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Question Jet MAF sensor ugrade issues?????

I have a 1998 ranger with 3.0 and I just installed the Jet MAF and my truck doen't idel right and the engine pings under acceleration? Then my check engine light came on! I called Jet tech support and he said that it was normal and it will go away after 100 miles or so! I just don't want it to harm my engine! I would really appreciate any info on these MAF sensors!
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #2  
wendell borror's Avatar
wendell borror
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
For one, there is no way a stock 3.0 needs a bigger maf. Unless you have a turbo or super charger, you'll see no performance increase. I put a jet chip on my 99 f-150, it cost me a 500.00$ computer. I'm not a big fan of jet, I can't say it will hurt your motor, but I can say it won't help your motor. Try resetting the computer, pull the positive cable off the battery for about 1/2 hour, reinstall and try it. I would tell you to get your money back, but since the part has been installed, I'm sure they won't. Also find out what code it's throwing from your check engine light. If the computer won't relearn on it's own for the bigger maf, you may need to get a bama programer from www.jusnesmodified.com. I put a maf on that same f-150, it caused a lean condition, I wasn't going to try another jet chip, took it to the shop, they finally got it running right, equalized the air, fuel ratio, but there was no increased performance.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #3  
wendell borror's Avatar
wendell borror
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
I thought about your situation a little more, pinging isn't good, just like running lean isn't good. I don't want to see you hurt your engine. If resetting the computer doesn't help, can you put the stock maf back on ? If so, put it on and call or e-mail Doug at www.bama chips.com, and ask him if he can do a program for the larger maf. I would also try and find out if the jet maf isn't malfunctioning. The maf I had was a gms and it needed a program, there was no bama back then, so the shop reprogramed the computer to except it. It seemed like a waste for just a maf, so I installed a larger tb and intake as well, then headers and a catback. It took a few trips to the shop to get it dialed in, it ran good, but the performance was disapointing compared to the money spent. I tried again on my present ranger, but this time had Doug program me up a bama and this truck runs like a scalded dog compared to the f-150. This time I didn't use a bigger tb or maf, the stock tb is 65 mm and can handle all the air that my motor needs with the mods I have. Larger mafs intail bigger injecters, poted heads, larger valves, bigger cam, or forced induction. I don't know what you have done to your motor, but I dout you needed a larger maf. It's to late to cry over spilled milk, so I hope you can get it running right so you won't have totally wasted your money. Try the computer reset first and then go from there. Good luck and let me know how it works out.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:00 PM
  #4  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
Return the JET! Granatelli and Pro-M have both stopped making MAFs for the rangers, since they had a bad reputation for giving unstable readings. Put the stock MAF back, the only time a 3.0 needs a larger maf is when its boosted, and even then, whipple uses an OEM 4.0 MAF.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #5  
wendell borror's Avatar
wendell borror
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
Thats what I think as well Bob, but will they take it back after it's been installed ? I had a granatelli, the shop got it running good, but it never ran great and the jet chip I had burned up my computer to boot. I dumped so much money into that truck, ended up trading it off. My ranger has turned out alot better with not near the mods that I ended up putting on the f-150. My ranger would have out run it. I learned alot from that experience. It would be nice if they would give him his money back, then he could spend it on something that works, like bama !!
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
Possibly, there is always ebay.
 
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
jdhudall's Avatar
jdhudall
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Well guys it is not a stock 3.0 I have JBA headers,high flow cats, true dual 2.25" strait back no mufflers, MAC cold air intake, turbo, Helix throtle body spacer, underdrive pulleys, removed fan& fan clutch and installed electric fan, cam and SCT programmer with 4 programs stock,87 octane,91 octane and 93 octane! each one adds more HP! The only bolt on mod I didn't have was the high flow mass air flow sensor and they claim you will see bigger hp gains with all the other mods I already have! I hoped it wasn't overkill and that it would give me a little more HP but if it isn't going to run right I will probably return it or sell it! I just wanted to see if anyone ever had any luck with the MAF upgrades??
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 04:19 AM
  #8  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
turbo, true duals, and intake? Those mods dont add up. As long as youre not boosted, you dont need a MAF, period. Your engine will only take in so much air without being force fed, even with all your mods. If you WERE force fed, then the kit you used should have come with a larger meter.

I dont know who has done your tuning, but BamaChips will tell you, if you have an aftermarket MAF on a ranger, ditch it. They wont even attempt to tune it, even on a dyno.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 09:58 AM
  #9  
b69bama69's Avatar
b69bama69
Freshman User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: pc alabama
with all those mods before the maf, was there any big improvement with the 3.0, i have same truck and just wondering cause stock 3.0 sucks in power
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
Best bet for power on the 3.0 is a BamaChips custom tuner. Then I would say an underdrive pulley. Intake and exhaust give marginal gains on a 3.0, but, it all adds up.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #11  
wendell borror's Avatar
wendell borror
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
I would say the easiest way to make power on a 3.0, would be some sort of forced induction, the other route would be to flow the heads, up the compresion, cam and so on. 3.0's aren't noted as performance engines, there's not a lot out for them. For a slight bump, I would say Bob's sugestions are on the right track. It would be interesting to see some dyno numbers on jdhudall truck to see where he's at with those mods, he may be on to something. The worst part about it is, you could put 3,000.00$ worth of mods on a 3.0 and still not have the power of a 4.0 sohc. I think ford would be better off loosing the 3.0 as not to keep torturing people with trying to get more power out of them, no offense .
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 01:07 PM
  #12  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
We do have a factory refurbished Whipple 3.0 kit with ported lower manifold and BamaChips tuning available. If youre seriously interested, contact me about it. That would make some power
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #13  
jdhudall's Avatar
jdhudall
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Question

Originally Posted by b69bama69
with all those mods before the maf, was there any big improvement with the 3.0, i have same truck and just wondering cause stock 3.0 sucks in power
Yes I have seen a major improvement over the stock 3.0 both torque and HP acording to my G-tech I went from 130 hp to 195 hp but all the mods are $$$$$ spendy!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chillman88
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
Apr 28, 2015 04:37 AM
BroncoBilt
Engine Swaps
11
Apr 24, 2015 09:20 PM
avadivin
Excursion - King of SUVs
11
Jan 21, 2015 07:53 PM
NovaNewfie
Modular V10 (6.8l)
6
Nov 8, 2013 09:02 AM
gman97005
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
1
Oct 25, 2013 03:38 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE