NOS or Turbo
My question is this: Which would be easier and/or cheaper...NOS or a turbocharger? I don't think I want to do a supercharger cuz I think they are more expensive. And eventually I'd like to run BOTH the NOS and the turbo. But this is just for starters.
I'm going to have to wait another 2 and a half years or 35000ish miles...gotta let me Extended Warranty run out before I do anything, but I'm just trying to get thoughts and ideas now. It's better to start early.
NOS is typically the cheapest way to get power initially, but over time/constantly refilling the tank, the costs start to equal out. I had a few company cars with NOS, the bottle tended to be empty at the most inopportune times...and I got lazy because it took too much time to drive all over town to fill it. But that was 10 years ago, you should be able to refill NOS pretty much anywhere these days.
Have you considered a used blower? That's the route I took.
I hadn't thought about the refill factor of a NOS bottle. Not a BIG issue...but it would probably get expensive, considering my driving style. And the main thing about the supercharger that scared me was the price...but I hadn't thought about saving now and keeping everything mostly stock until the major upgrade down the line. That's actually a great idea that I think I'll go for...thanks for the advice!
Ballz
If you are running tall tires you may want to re-consider gears. They'll maximize your power thanks to torque multiplication, and won't be adding any undue stress to your engine. In fact, they will increase performance without even touching your engine, so engine longevity isn't even an issue - it will be 100% stock. These are heavy trucks and they need all the gear they can get.
Any of the mods noted - NOS, turbo, supercharger - all make power, and power requires fuel. Add NOS, you need to richen the misture. Add boost, you need to richen the mixture. No way around it, drive it to take advantage of your newfound power, and MPG will suffer.



