Notices
2004 - 2008 F150 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 Ford F150's with 5.4 V8, 4.6 V8 engine
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gains from bolt ons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 01:37 PM
  #16  
bigdavewilson's Avatar
bigdavewilson
Elder User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Mirror, Alberta
Originally Posted by raccol
Thanks for the input. So basically, about 15hp is about all you can expect to get? I test drove the 4.6L on the highway last night and passing is terrible. Will the tuner make any significant difference with this or am I just out of luck unless I figure out how to get the 5.4?<O></O>

Any comments on this?
I would say doubtful about the rebate because by the time the 4.6's are gone the 5.4's will likely be gone already.

My experience with the 4.6 is limited to a couple of company trucks that I drove occasionally. My feeling is that it is a good motor for its displacement, but it is no 5.4.

Having said that, I think that the addition of a tuner will at least make you more comfortable with the towing and passing capabilities. The change in the shift quality alone will make a significant difference. Start with the tuner and then do intake and exhaust mods as you can afford them.

Try to drive a truck that has been broken in as well. The 4.6 makes its power at fairly high rpm's and this is probably affected more in a motor that is still tight.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #17  
bigdavewilson's Avatar
bigdavewilson
Elder User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Mirror, Alberta
Originally Posted by raccol
I'm looking at buying a 2006 S-Crew XLT with a 4.6L and tow package. I would prefer the 5.4L but with the extra $2K rebate being offered for the 4.6L makes it almost a $3K difference. I’ve read many of the posts recommending the 5.4L option with the heavier duty tranny and rear and I would go this route if the budget allowed. I don’t plan to do a lot of towing and the max would probably be about 4500 lbs.

Given there’s probably a 4.6 in my future, what kind of horsepower gains can be made with a programmer/tuner and minor bolt-ons at a later time? Would it be enough to split the difference with the 5.4, say around 265 hp?

A side note, since Ford is currently pushing the 2006 4.6L with the rebate, will they likely offer a similar rebate on leftover 5.4L once the 4.6L are gone?

Thanks
One thing that is getting mixed up in the discussions is the difference between power at the flywheel and power at the rear wheels.

My guess is that you could very likely split the difference between the 4.6 factory horsepower rating and the 5.4 factory horsepower rating with a tuner and some intake and exhaust work. Where you will still be down is in torque because of the displacement and the fact that the 5.4 is a longer stroke motor. I don't think any manufacturer has ever published a rear wheel horsepower rating and I seriously doubt that they ever will. In fact the published numbers probably come from a motor without any practical encumberances such as any drive belts or accessories (kind of like weight numbers without any fluids in the truck, designed to sell, not to enlighten).
 

Last edited by bigdavewilson; Sep 2, 2006 at 01:52 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 02:10 PM
  #18  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
The torque of a tuned 4.6 compared to a stock 5.4 is shocklinly close. Our dyno posted earlier showed roughly 279 at the wheels on a tuned 4.6. A 5.4 with the SAME bolts ons, on the SAME dyno, pulled just after that truck showed roughly 283 at the wheels, without a tune. So achieving the same torque as a stock 5.4 can be done with a few mods, the tune seems to give the largest boost.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 12:27 AM
  #19  
is300wrx's Avatar
is300wrx
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, CT
Originally Posted by Bob Jusnes
Pulleys are $199
http://jusnesmodified.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=156_161_268 _417&products_id=187

Efans range, but the most popular (and most expensive) is $315 for Dual 16s with Dual Controllers
http://jusnesmodified.com/store/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=156_161_234

Or you can get them both, in a package deal with a gatorback belt for $529
http://jusnesmodified.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=156_161_275 &products_id=208

All these prices include shipping

I have the Edge as my programmer...does this unit allow you to raise the idle RPM??
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #20  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
As far as i know, the EDGE will allow you to raise the Idle. You will have to cycle through its options, but thats a pretty basic one.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #21  
exiled's Avatar
exiled
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 11
I'm alittle lost here and maybe someone can help. An engine makes a "x" amount of HP and torque. In our case the 5.4 makes 300 Hp. Pullies, transmission, brakes, rearends, and tires rob at least in the neiborhood of 75 horses. But this things on rob it once. What i;m trying to say is if you boost the engine say 15 HP then you sould see it at the rearwheels. Gaining the 1st 70 or so HP use to be called freeing up HP cause it was power the engine made but was stolen. I'm feeling yall are saying that if you add to the engine the componts are still robbing the power. i dont get that. if you where to change your drive pulleys by 1% it should change the rear power by 1%. For the life of me i cant figure why this wont hold true.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 04:08 PM
  #22  
raccol's Avatar
raccol
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Thanks guys for the input. You've let me know that you can close the gap enough to make a difference. I opted for the 4.6 with 3.73 since that's the only way I could get one with the tow package and TL. As much as I wanted he 5.4L, I just couldn't justify the almost $4K difference they were asking ($900 for the engine option and an additional $3K in rebates).

At what point can I start making the mods? I'll start with the tuner and then the exhaust. I think I'll pass on the intake and just make the mods listed in this post.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #23  
lemosley01's Avatar
lemosley01
New User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bigdavewilson
One thing that is getting mixed up in the discussions is the difference between power at the flywheel and power at the rear wheels.

My guess is that you could very likely split the difference between the 4.6 factory horsepower rating and the 5.4 factory horsepower rating with a tuner and some intake and exhaust work. Where you will still be down is in torque because of the displacement and the fact that the 5.4 is a longer stroke motor. I don't think any manufacturer has ever published a rear wheel horsepower rating and I seriously doubt that they ever will. In fact the published numbers probably come from a motor without any practical encumberances such as any drive belts or accessories (kind of like weight numbers without any fluids in the truck, designed to sell, not to enlighten).
As I recall, there was a big flap about this. GM (and Ford, possibly) were accusing the japanese manufacturers (specifically Toyota) of inflating their HP numbers by rating their engines without accessory drives, while Ford and GM both rated power with accessories attached (but not at the rear wheel).

Bob, out of curiosity, what does the 4.6L torque curve look like on these trucks vs a 5.4L. I'm used the to torque curve on the 4.6L DOHC engines where they would make all peak torque at 4800 RPMS or higher, so you would have to gear them to death (I had 4.30s in my Cobra) to get them to move.

I'm thinking about a programmer. We just got the truck - anyone local to Columbus OH have a 5.4L with a programmer on it so I can see the affects?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #24  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
hmm. all the dyno charts i have are scanned pieces of paper, so i cant lay one torque curve over the other. I think i already posted our 4.6 chart up, here is a chart of our 5.4 without a tune. Right now im having a hard time rounding up the chart that was WITH a tune, but we were having trouble with the dyno. Its apparent in our 5.4 chart that we were having fun dealing with the torque management, which kind of skewed the torque curve, giving it that wavy look. The numbers arent actually too bad, this run was done with the stock intake and stock tuning. Only mods were pulleys, fans, and magnaflow cat back
 
Attached Images  

Last edited by Bob Jusnes; Sep 3, 2006 at 04:57 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #25  
lemosley01's Avatar
lemosley01
New User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
That's a good comparison. It's pretty easy to see that the 4.6 peaks early then falls off, while the 5.4 seems to peak and hold steady (other than whatever games the computer was playing). I guess the 4.6L is running out of breath up top?

Those 3vs and 2v 4.6Ls are nice! I'm use to seeing torque that looks like horsepower curve, not something that peaks off idle and holds steady.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #26  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
Right, the 5.4 is pretty good about holding that torque, if we could have gotten the dyno to work like we wanted (we had a lot of trouble with the charts on a 6.0 PSD as well) we could have gotten some really accurate results, so i do apologize for that.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #27  
bigdavewilson's Avatar
bigdavewilson
Elder User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Mirror, Alberta
Originally Posted by Bob Jusnes
on a reg cab 4.6, with our efans, pullies, and a custom exhaust, we dynoed 209/233 peak. We had BamaChips make a custom tune for it right there on the dyno, and peaked 225/279, so, at the peak of each band, the tune gained 16/46 at the wheels. I wish had gone back to look at the max gain. It held well above 250 torque until about 4700 rpm.

These engines have plenty of oomph that can be released, so dont fell bad that you got one, they still make enough power to move around in traffic.

The 4.6 in the truck is a 2v for now, expect a 3v in late 07 or 08

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/a...tid=2490&stc=1
Kind of frustrating when the 3V 4.6 is available in the Explorerer Sport-Trac right now (and with the 6 speed automatic). Must be some sort of marketing decision which keeps this combination out of the F150.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #28  
Bob Jusnes's Avatar
Bob Jusnes
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Fuquay Varina,NC
VERY SOON you will see the 3v 4.6 in the F150, along with a 4v DOHC aluminum 5.4 (at least according to the ford parts system )
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 02:08 PM
  #29  
hllon4whls's Avatar
hllon4whls
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Mandeville, La
Originally Posted by raccol
I'm looking at buying a 2006 S-Crew XLT with a 4.6L and tow package. I would prefer the 5.4L but with the extra $2K rebate being offered for the 4.6L makes it almost a $3K difference. I’ve read many of the posts recommending the 5.4L option with the heavier duty tranny and rear and I would go this route if the budget allowed. I don’t plan to do a lot of towing and the max would probably be about 4500 lbs.

Given there’s probably a 4.6 in my future, what kind of horsepower gains can be made with a programmer/tuner and minor bolt-ons at a later time? Would it be enough to split the difference with the 5.4, say around 265 hp?

A side note, since Ford is currently pushing the 2006 4.6L with the rebate, will they likely offer a similar rebate on leftover 5.4L once the 4.6L are gone?

Thanks
I am curious as to where you get the info on rebates. I just looked on fords website and there is no extra rebate for a 4.6 vs 5.4. Maybe your dealer is trying to push a 4.6 your way.

http://www.fordvehicles.com/trucks/f...r=06&zip=70433

I dont know if the above link will work from here, but if you start out at fordvehicles.com and work to trucks, there is a incentives/financing button on the left that will bring you to the proper site.

I bought my 4x4 crew 5.4 5/01/06 and I got literally right at 10k off the sticker. Stickered for 39,XXX paid 29,997 plus TTL.

Take a look at edmunds.com as well. They have info on invoice prices and rebates. If you come in informed, it is easier to push what you want. I dont look to get anything for free, but I do want a very reasonable deal.

OH, on fordvehicles.com you can also search dealer inventory. Very cool feature. My truck was the only one in SE la that was configed the way I wanted. Made the deal over email and picked up the truck with very little problems.
 
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #30  
raccol's Avatar
raccol
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
All the local dealers were pushing the 4.6L because of the additional rebates. This was based on Aug's rebates so I don't know what has changed for Sept. They only had four 4.6L and over 30 5.4L.

MSRP on my truck was 31,900 and they knocked off 11,050.
The 5.4 I wanted was 33,100 (diff was engine and capt chairs) and they would only knock of 8K.

They started at invoice and deducted hold back on both trucks. They told me the remaining difference was the rebates. Either way I got a nearly $32K truck for just under $21K.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE