Notices
1999 - 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Help me please!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #16  
Deluxe05's Avatar
Deluxe05
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 4
From: Denver, Co
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by CharlyG
it's less than 800 bucks. That's less than 8 fillups now!!!
You can justify it however you want to justify it, but the truth of the matter will remain still be the same; spending money on performance parts for fuel economy reasons is a losing proposition.

As FortyFords stated, opening up the intake & exhaust with performance parts is just allowing the engine to breath better, but, once it starts cycling more air through, it is also going to start adding more fuel in order to maintain the appropriate air/fuel mixture.

As for all of these manufacturers' and their inflated claims to providing better fuel economy, I just have one word to say, "ADVERTISING". And it obviously works, because aftermarket performance parts is a multi-billion dollar business.
 
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 07:58 PM
  #17  
CharlyG's Avatar
CharlyG
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 6
From: West Hills, Ca.
Well, I did it on my Sub, but I don't think I will do much with the "Beast". The original owner has already eliminated the muffler, I just have the cat and pipes. I reprogrammed the sub(had to run premium), had a trueflow intake, and an Aero-Turbine exhaust. It ran great but still couldn't pull my TT without overheating. It had plenty of power, but only 3.73 gears, and a weak cooling system. It was louder than my straight pipes! I'm a little uncomfortable with no muffler at all. I am thinking about an Aero-turbine with a resonator to takes some of the volume away. It was never too loud to order food as the diesel guys sometimes say. The V-10 stay [retty quiet under 2000 RPM, but if I punch it, she snarls pretty good!
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #18  
crew02's Avatar
crew02
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Princeton, IL
thanks again guys
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #19  
estimator's Avatar
estimator
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Change the oxygen sensors. They can account for 15% or more better economy.
Change all the filters, disconnect the battery for one hour, then start up the truck and let it idle for 3 minutes. This will re-establish thecomputer for good performance.
Ensure that the engine compartment is clean like new, and all belts and electrical
wiring is perfect. Be easy on acceleration( under 2000rpm).
Use cruise control on the highway, under 70 mph, and you should get 15 mpg
Make sure all excess weight is removed from the back seat and the box.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 05:57 PM
  #20  
pmasley's Avatar
pmasley
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 7
From: Eccles, WV
An open exhaust on a gasser is definately a waste as earlier said. It will draw more fuel than needed and a lot of it goes unburned and out the tailpipe. A gasser needs a little back pressure to operate effeciently. One thing that will help is if you have a camshaft setting guide and set the camshafts properly. Mot set at the factory is for making it run with the least trouble. I have seem them off as much as 10 degrees. Get someone that knows what they are doing and have them check it. It can be worth at least 3 to 4 miles per gallon when set right. Comp Cams will give you the specs for free. All you have to do is call them.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #21  
CharlyG's Avatar
CharlyG
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 6
From: West Hills, Ca.
Does my cat give enough back pressure? I only have a cat and pipes.
 
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #22  
pmasley's Avatar
pmasley
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 7
From: Eccles, WV
If I was running a gasser, I would have a dual setup with a set of the factory cats (federal regulation), a crossover and and a set of mufflers that I could see through, with dual pipes exiting right behind the rear wheels (factory look). With the pipes out the back, it makes it easier for the local gestapo to stop you as all the noise is concentrated at the rear and they would know that it has been modded.

With only one cat, you may have more back pressure than you need. It does not take much. You want the engine to push the exhaust, but not to have to use power to do it.

Also, once you get past the cat, increase the pipe size 1/4 inch (make it square, not balloned), then when you pass the muffler, increase it another 1/4 inch. Starting out with 2 1/2 pipe at the headpipes will give you a 3 inch exhaust at the tips. The lips will keep the exhaust from backing up and will also add more cooling to the gas. The cooler gas will contract and draw the heat faster down the system, thus more efficient.

A good sound, slightly moderate backpressure. An example of a good muffler will have a solid pipe with cutouts straight through it. The Bully Dog muffler I have on my SD can be installed with the cutouts facing the engine (little restriction but, quieter) or facing the tailpipe (no restriction, no noise reduction). Mine faces the tailpipe.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 08:57 PM
  #23  
crew02's Avatar
crew02
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Princeton, IL
Originally Posted by CounterMaker
i have a 2006 f250 5.4 ext cab 8ft bed with 3.73 gears and when i ride i pretty hard...letting the rpm get up over 2000 i get about 11.5 mpg and when i drive very easy and harley never let the rpms get over 2000 i get about 13.5...tire pressure and all that other stuff will help to a degree but the best thing is your driving habits...DRIVE SLOWER AND START OFF SLOWER...this is a lot of truck to get moving with the 5.4...dont get me wrong i love my truck but you have to drive it like theres and egg under the gas to get better gas mileage
Made a 120 mile run yesterday with the truck and my 20 foot trailer with about a 3,000 # car on it. Limited the times it turned over 2,000 rpm's, and got almost 15 mpg's. Thanks alot guys...
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:52 AM
  #24  
pmasley's Avatar
pmasley
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 7
From: Eccles, WV
120 miles is not enough to give you an accurate reading. It ususally takes about three tanks. Then average the miles per gallon, you will notice quite a change.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 01:51 AM
  #25  
FATFAB's Avatar
FATFAB
New User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
My 1999 f350 SC AT 5.4l 3.73 gears 132,000 miles was gitting only 6.5-7.5 MPG Then I pulled the factory plugs and am gitting 9-12MPG depending on the weight of my boot.


Fat-Fab.com
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 11:02 AM
  #26  
CharlyG's Avatar
CharlyG
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 6
From: West Hills, Ca.
"If I was running a gasser, I would have a dual setup with a set of the factory cats (federal regulation)" AND "With only one cat, you may have more back pressure than you need."

This does not make sense. how can two cats give less pressure than one?
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #27  
pmasley's Avatar
pmasley
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 7
From: Eccles, WV
Exclamation

With one cat on each side, it can handle the exhaust flow with less restriction than having both pipes dump into one cat as designed from the factory.

This will give you an expample. I had a '79 T-Bird with a big block 400 that ran it's exhaust system into a single line with one cat and a muffler/tailpipe. The car produced a little over 170 horses. I removed the muffler (straight piped) and gained 6. I changed the exhaust over to a dual with a crossover (dual cats) and straight piped) and it went over 190. The results was better fuel mileage (15 to 19), more horsepower and the emissions actually went down about 30%.

The dual cats actually had less work to do over the same area of cleaning space, resulting is less back pressure. As the engine did not have to push the exhaust into a single outlet, it worked more effiecently (sic) and the crossover balanced the exhaust pulses making for a smoother running engine.

I know that this was done on an older vehicle, but I would say the the principal would work on today's modern engines also.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #28  
sifon187's Avatar
sifon187
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
I know greater fuel mileage would be great. But in all reality, we drive a truck that has the aerodynamics of a house, large engines, and heavy wieght. If you really think about it, you have to spend money to save money. Why really bother. Lets take all the money we spend on upgrades and performance and buy a oil company for us ford guys. FREE GAS FOR EVERYONE ON HERE
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 12:52 PM
  #29  
CharlyG's Avatar
CharlyG
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 6
From: West Hills, Ca.
I like that idea. Ford only gas stations, and for FREE!
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #30  
pmasley's Avatar
pmasley
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 7
From: Eccles, WV
CharleyG,

Did I answer your question?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE