Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

different cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 04:03 AM
  #1  
69ford99's Avatar
69ford99
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Paola
different cam?

I have a '96 with the 5.8 and its alright but according to the factory specs I believe you get peak torque at 2500. Thats kinda low aint it? I've never had a 4 wheel drive so thats prolly about right for low end pulling power. I figured it would have more ***** on the highway if I got a cam that put the rpms higher up like 3000. What do ya think?
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 07:04 AM
  #2  
MBBFord's Avatar
MBBFord
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,542
Likes: 5
From: Louisiana
To tell the truth, I don't think you should just put a cam in it for better performance.
If it were a older model truck pre 80s, then there are no computors, and the upgrade wouldn't confuse the computor.

Also all ford engines make peak torque at low RPMs, and peak HP at around 4,500 RPMs or so.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #3  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
for as heavy of a rig these broncos are you gotta have the torque building lower. now you could take and install some 1.7 rockers and upgrade to a 56mm bbk throttlebody and headers and bassani Y pipe with hiflow cats and 3" exhaust from there out and see a big improvement over what your currently feeling. plus those mods will not affect the computer especially on your rig
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #4  
greystreak92's Avatar
greystreak92
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,182
Likes: 12
From: Gateway to the West
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 69ford99
I figured it would have more ***** on the highway if I got a cam that put the rpms higher up like 3000. What do ya think?
Ditto to what has been said already. The weight of the Bronco especially with the added weight of the front driveline requires peak torque at lower RPMs just to get it moving. If you aren't getting peak torque that soon, with the way the truck is geared combined with the preprogrammed parameters for the transmission shiftpoints in the computer, higher RPM's will serve about one purpose... reduced fuel economy, something these rigs don't need ANY help with anyway.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 01:03 PM
  #5  
69ford99's Avatar
69ford99
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Paola
Well I was comparing the seat of the pants feel as far as flooring it at about 65mph to my dads '95 F-150 extended cab flare side 2wd with the 302 and his seems to have more oomph on the highway. Does the 302 get its peak torque at a higher rpm? I figured they weighed about the same.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #6  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
the 302 is a hi rpm motor making power differently then the 5.8.

what size tires are you running and what size tires does he have along with axle ratio etc..
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 04:15 PM
  #7  
MBBFord's Avatar
MBBFord
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,542
Likes: 5
From: Louisiana
Like kemical said, the 302 makes power at higher rpms, mostly b/c they were originally a car engine, and didn't need alot of torque to get them moving.
I'll never know why Ford put those car engines(302s) in their trucks.....
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2006 | 11:47 PM
  #8  
69ford99's Avatar
69ford99
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Paola
his truck has dual exhaust, 3.55's, and tires are like 255/60/15. I have bassani y pipe and 40 flowmaster with mandrel bent tail pipe,a k&n drop in filter, 3.55's and 31X10.5 oh and 176,000 miles not sure his milage. How close is the weight between these 2 trucks? One more thing I really want to get headers but keep talking myself out of getting them because I want the bassani ceramic and they're a bit pricey. Will I notice a big gain and if so topend or low end?
 

Last edited by 69ford99; Jun 29, 2006 at 11:52 PM.
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 30, 2006 | 09:00 AM
  #9  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
shorties will give you bit of top end. jba,gibson,edelbrock,BBK also make a ceramic coated header that is great quality. Bassani's are the best but not neccessary
 
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #10  
pud's Avatar
pud
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
93-98 351w make 310 ft/lbs @ 2800 rpm and 200hp @ 3800rpm

88-98 5.0L EFI make 270 ft/lbs @ 2000 rpm and 200hp @ 4200rpm
-HO make 300 ft/lbs @ 3000 rpm and 225hp @ 4600rpm
check the specs on your stock cam, and the ones off a mustang HO cam.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE