Ford using Cummins
you know what would be nice? keep in mind it will never happen. If Cummins, Cat, Detroit, and IH all built an engine for pickups. Then had driveline options,
Could you imagine the fun goind to you local Ford/GM/Dodge dealer and picking the engine/tranny combo you wanted?
77hiboyboy
Well said, except for the 444 part. There are two CPL# that actually where good. 1801 was one and I think the other was 1830. I drove one that was a real beast.
Could you imagine the fun goind to you local Ford/GM/Dodge dealer and picking the engine/tranny combo you wanted?
77hiboyboy
Well said, except for the 444 part. There are two CPL# that actually where good. 1801 was one and I think the other was 1830. I drove one that was a real beast.
My brother in law was just told this, by supposedly someone in the know, who apparently isn't... but he wanted to argue with me when I told him these rumors are floating around. Also tried saying Dodge was going to Cat...
The dodge using a cat would make the most sense... However I think that a MB diesel would be a more likely solution. The sprinter diesel would work very well in the trucks... On second thought it'd probably break the transmissions like the cummins does.
first off ya'll will never see a cat in a sd from the factory at least not in a long time for the main reason that cat doesn't want in to the light duty market as for a cummins thats a possiblity but like someone said they are putting money into things we wont see for 10 years
Originally Posted by nawf
im srry but they use the powerstrokes on the f650's
Originally Posted by nawf
im srry but they use the powerstrokes on the f650's
We service a fleet of F-650 trucks that have 6.0 International engines in them. They're a little different than the pick-up truck engine, they hold about 20 litres of oil and use the same fuel bowl that the 7.3 used, but other than that they're basically the same. Other than the fact that they are dangerously underpowered.
Last edited by CanadaGuy; Jul 6, 2006 at 07:02 PM.
Originally Posted by Aussie Pete
Pfft, forget Cummins. If they're gonna change put in a CAT. Nothing like a yellow pu$$ycat under the bonnet! A C7 at 350hp would make a very nice package indeed (accepting that it is cylinder deficient). Put a manual Eaton trans behind that and I'd be in heaven.
Problem is the engine bay of an F-series SD may not like the length of the inline engine.
Problem is the engine bay of an F-series SD may not like the length of the inline engine.
The cummins is a good engine in the 2500 & 3500 dodge, but it needs a good transmission. without that, the engine is useless. the cummins 6.0 turbo pulls good mileage too. it gets almost as good as a 4.0L ranger.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1949f1
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
Sep 10, 2016 12:07 PM
1972RedNeck
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Jul 27, 2012 09:16 PM



Road test after road test shows the Cummins is a chronic underachiever in the real world vs. the paper specs.






