Notices
Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Overhead readout calibration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #1  
cjspack's Avatar
cjspack
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Southwestern Ohio
Overhead readout calibration

My overhead computer readout display for average mpg is way off. It reads approximately 10 mpg more than it should. All the other readouts seem to be correct (except for the distance-to-empty, which I'm guessing is based on the mpg results). Is there a way to calibrate, or re-calibrate the computer/display to make it more accurate? Thanks.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #2  
Beachbumcook's Avatar
Beachbumcook
Got Diesel?
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 21
The only TSB for SD trucks or 6.0L motors is the following... but it is not an exact match for your problem (thought I would share anyway).

Overhead Trip Computer Distance to Empty Reading Incorrect:Trucks built after 11-18-02 may have an incorrect DTE reading displayed on the OTC. The OTC will need to be reprogrammed using As-Built data matching the specific tank sizes listed in TSB #04-15-10.

The other option is to disconnect both batteries, wait a few minutes and reconnect. This may or may not reset all computer functions, but it is worth a try? Your truck will run rough as it relearns computer, driving, and transmission settings... but it is a "no cost, safe" approach to seeing if it works? It may allow your truck (may take 2 tanks of fuel) to learn total miles left of fuel and average mpg???

The only other option is to see if a re-flash for your computer is available as this resets and brings it up to all current computer, fuel injection and transmission settings (some have had good luck with this and others not so good luck).

These are your only options that I can think of... so good luck.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #3  
cficare's Avatar
cficare
Logistics Pro
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,529
Likes: 390
From: SEVA
You are resetting it at every fill-up aren't you? If not, then it may be the cumulative total of the typical error (usually 0.3 to 0.5 MPG ... mine's typically off by 0.4 MPG) from who knows how many fill-ups. I like the idea of disconnecting the batteries to reset it.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 05:42 AM
  #4  
cjspack's Avatar
cjspack
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Southwestern Ohio
Thanks for the help, guys. I forgot to mention I have a superchips programmer installed. (It came w/the truck when I bought it.) Could this somehow be causing the mpg readout misrepresentation? In addition, I'm assuming if I disconnect the batteries it would cause the programmer to go back to the stock setting.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 08:20 AM
  #5  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by cjspack
Thanks for the help, guys. I forgot to mention I have a superchips programmer installed. (It came w/the truck when I bought it.) Could this somehow be causing the mpg readout misrepresentation?

In addition, I'm assuming if I disconnect the batteries it would cause the programmer to go back to the stock setting.
Yes. People have reported that happens. I was checking my mpg and it was pretty accurate. DP-Tuner programmed PCM and the first time it was off 0.5 mpg. Have to check more.

No. The programer has made it's program the "stock" setting.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #6  
ymmv's Avatar
ymmv
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
I have an '05 Limited 6.0 -- the mpg thing is seemingly accurate "instantaneously" but the cumulative number is optimistic to say the least. On a 44 gallon tank, I'd expect to use 40 gallons, which at 15mpg, should see 600 miles, right? But the lie-o-meter (as it's called around here) almost invariably shows an average of 15 but the tank is empty between 500 and 600 miles and needs about 40 gallons (or about $135.00) to fill up to the first click meaning the real average is below 15. On the highway, it suggests 18mpg but the trip meter rarely sees 700 miles, so still less than expected.

I find the "distance to empty" is pretty smart if not all that accurate. If I half fill the tank (or at least I don't go over $100 at once just to preserve my temper) I notice it goes optimistic (800+ DTE) then it adjusts to the actual fuel level (somehow?)

The DTE is pretty consistent -- once it say "0" I have about 50 miles comfortably in the tank and the diesel has a sort of "limp home" behaviour if I run the tank to the last drop (which has happened twice so far) it will start to lose rpm (but run smoothly at idle) and have just enough oomph to crawl along at 10mph ... which has saved me a couple of mile walk on both occasions.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 02:27 PM
  #7  
aklim's Avatar
aklim
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,308
Likes: 250
From: Hartford, WI
Club FTE Silver Member

I have gotten within 2 tenths of the actual mileage since I have 3 decimal places to go with for the fuel and 1 for the mileage and only 1 for the meter.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #8  
cjspack's Avatar
cjspack
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Southwestern Ohio
I guess my lie-o-meter must be on steroids. According to it I'm averaging somewhere between 26 and 30+ mpg on a consistent basis, whether I reset it each fill-up or not. That is a mix of city and highway driving. My actual mpg is usually between 16-18.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 25, 2006 | 06:11 PM
  #9  
"Huck"'s Avatar
"Huck"
Freshman User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Franklin,Pa.
Maybe it is set for imperial gallons.

Are you in canada?

It can be changed, I read it in my owners manual.
 
Reply
Old May 25, 2006 | 09:01 PM
  #10  
cjspack's Avatar
cjspack
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Southwestern Ohio
Thanks for your idea, Huck. I never thought of that possibility. The X has spent its whole life in the states, but I'll check out the possibility.
 
Reply
Old May 26, 2006 | 02:30 PM
  #11  
cjspack's Avatar
cjspack
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Southwestern Ohio
I looked in my owner's manual and all I could find is how to change from english to metric units (gallons to liters).
 
Reply
Old May 27, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #12  
turboale's Avatar
turboale
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
my solution to the lie-o-meter...



Though it is nice knowing MPG on the go, its not really needed. just think about keeping your foot out of it and that tends to help me more than looking at a number that could be right, or could be way off. We need to get some computer guys like Jody on this and see if they can't do something about it. Other than that, I don't think its going to be worth your time. I could be wrong though!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wsu0702
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
3
Feb 12, 2017 07:04 PM
99350Ron
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
6
Dec 14, 2011 10:16 AM
ddrumman2004
2009 - 2014 F150
20
May 9, 2011 08:01 PM
00 Nav
1997 - 2006 Expedition & Navigator
2
Feb 5, 2007 07:14 PM
MountaineerAWD
Escape & Escape Hybrid
6
Jul 29, 2006 06:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE