Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

efi computer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #1  
green53's Avatar
green53
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 1
efi computer

I will soon be looking for a used bronco that I will use mainly for going to the cabin, light off roading and up north on the lakes ice fishing. I may want to modify the engine some, and would like to know what was the last year for the ecu's that are easier to work with. I doubt I will need mass air, but may want to change heads, intake and a cam without too much overlap. I will consider the 351s better than the 302s for my purposes. I won't be using it for a daily driver, probably used 10 to 20 times a year plus a little running around town to keep it from 'settin' too much. Also because there is a lot of rusty ones in Ontario, are the bushwacker cut out flares good for minor rust at the rear wheel wells, I mean are they solid enough once installed? Or does 'stuff' get inside and start the rust process again? Thanks.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 11:34 PM
  #2  
greystreak92's Avatar
greystreak92
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,182
Likes: 12
From: Gateway to the West
Club FTE Gold Member
The only Broncos that are mass air are a select number of 95's with the 302 and the entire 96 model line-up. The rest are speed density. The cam is the limiting factor on these engines because there is no way for the ECA to compensate for drastic changes in duration and separation so IF you decide to swap the cam, you will simply have to make certain you make certain the design is speed-density-friendly. This isn't really a major issue because they are available but your selection is obviously more limited.

As to what is "easier to work with" its a toss up. Mass-air gives you a wider range of options on the cam but has a bit more electronics to deal with at least as far as the injection since its true sequential-port injection and mass air sensors can be tempermental.

Speed density has the limited cam options and is bank-fired injection but the rest of it is straight forward and none of the speed density models use ODB-II diagnostics so you can still retrieve fault codes with nothing more complicated than a paperclip. 96's are OBD-II across the board.

The rust over the rear wheels affect TWO parts of the body because the moisture settles between the inner wheel well and the outer skin of the rear quarter. the worse the problem the more the gap between the two metal pieces as a result of the "cancer".
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 06:50 AM
  #3  
alxsnmr's Avatar
alxsnmr
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 1
From: St Louis
Mass air is something that can be had from Ford Racing for the Speed density Broncos. Last catalog from summit that I received showed the upgrade for EEC-IV speed density to Mass air near $700.00 for Broncos and Ford trucks.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 06:57 AM
  #4  
Streetgang's Avatar
Streetgang
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
From: Hoboken, NJ...
Originally Posted by greystreak92
The only Broncos that are mass air are a select number of 95's with the 302 and the entire 96 model line-up. The rest are speed density.
I had a 94 w/5.8 that was mass air.......I think it was a "California" model...????
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 08:57 AM
  #5  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
94 was the first year with mass air on a 302 in the bronco.
 
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #6  
green53's Avatar
green53
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 146
Likes: 1
Thanks, I knew you guys would come up with the info. Now I can start looking for a truck.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE