Notices

stroke a 2.8?, can it be done?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 10:12 PM
  #1  
cowboy4christ38's Avatar
cowboy4christ38
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
stroke a 2.8?, can it be done?

i have heard that the pushrod 4.0 v-6 was jus a bored and stroked version of the 2.8, with probably different heads etc., but my question is, i have a 2.8 and desire more power, and it wont be long till rebuild time gets here, and i was wanderin if i could fit the old style 4.0 crank into the 2.8, and install the longer piston rods with it, bearings etc. but i also planned on jus borin it around 20 or 30 over as long as it would clear the scratches in the cylinder if there is ne, so i wondered if i could put some 20 or 30 over pistons on the 4.0 rods, i was jus wanderin if that would work to make it a stroker motor, ive never tore my engine apart to know,and i figure id' have to get the bigger heads, and that'd be alotta work probably too. it's prolly a far fetched question, but if ne one could answer this for me, let me know thanks u guys!
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 11:11 PM
  #2  
AlfredB1979's Avatar
AlfredB1979
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 1
From: Alvin, Texas.
Well, despite being related, the 2.hate, 2.9, and 4.0L share almost ZERO common parts, if they indeed share any at all. You can think of the 4.0L as a bored and stroked 2.hate, but you can not take that literally, since that is NOT truly the case.

If you really want a power upgrade, swap to an actual 4.0L (you must keep the EFI) or if you want to stay carbed, do a 5.0L swap.

As was put in another forum, "These are not SBCs we are dealing with here"
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 08:45 AM
  #3  
Psychopete's Avatar
Psychopete
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, IN
In a stroker engine, the rods are shorter and the throw on the crank is longer to get the extra displacement. One factor you need to think about is if the crank is going to hit the side of the block.

I imagine it could be done, but it's not going to be cheap. You're going to need to do a lot of measuring and lots of machine work. Start looking for the specifications of the parts and see what you're dealing with. I would be greatly suprised if everything just fit. The duability or life of the motor would be questioned. It would be a neat project though!

IMO - Like what was stated - Cheaper for 302 or 4.0L. Or even the roller lifter 5.0L H.O. You could essentially swap the cam, computer, injectors and a few other parts and do a Cobra kit conversion for a lot cheaper than buying the actual kit. My friend was able to pick up a 5.0L H.O. + AOD and wiring harness for $400 from a 93' Thunder Chicken. We basically drove the car home, ripped everything out, filled it with bad junk parts and sent it back to the junk yard.

Pete
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 02:23 AM
  #4  
rbohm's Avatar
rbohm
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: tucson/luray usa
the 2.9 crank can be installed in the 2.8 block for a slight stroke increase. you need to turn the snout down to fit the 2.8 timing gear and balancer though. the cost isnt going to be worth the extra power you will get, as the change isnt going to be much powerwise. better would be to swap the 2.8 out for a 4.0.

and by the way, the 4.0 block is taller than the 2.8 to accomodate the longer stroke. the 4.0 has other differences as well, they do share the bellhousing bolt pattern though.
 
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #5  
Crossfire's Avatar
Crossfire
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
I don't know what the deck height of various versions of the 60-degree V6 are, but consider this: A 4.0L crank plus 2.9 rods plus Mopar 3.3L V6 pistons gives almost exactly the same total compression height as a stock 2.9 setip and yields approx. 211ci/3.5L. Practical? Maybe, if you consider that a stroker 2.9 wouldn't require rewiring with a new computer and buying the 4.0 intake. As far as machining the snout, a lot of machine shops don't charge very much if it's done at the same time the journals are turned.

I would appreciate if someone could give me the center-to-center lengths of the 60-degree V6 rods and block deck heights of the different engines.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 11:40 PM
  #6  
cowboy4christ38's Avatar
cowboy4christ38
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
thanks u guys for sendin some answers my way, i jus wanna make a beast outta my 2.8 and that way, the truck is kinda stock lookin, cause it looks like a brand new 83 model. but ya'll i appreciate, and thanks for the tips! God Bless!
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #7  
capri racer's Avatar
capri racer
New User
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
measurements.

measurements
Originally Posted by Crossfire
I don't know what the deck height of various versions of the 60-degree V6 are, but consider this: A 4.0L crank plus 2.9 rods plus Mopar 3.3L V6 pistons gives almost exactly the same total compression height as a stock 2.9 setip and yields approx. 211ci/3.5L. Practical? Maybe, if you consider that a stroker 2.9 wouldn't require rewiring with a new computer and buying the 4.0 intake. As far as machining the snout, a lot of machine shops don't charge very much if it's done at the same time the journals are turned.

I would appreciate if someone could give me the center-to-center lengths of the 60-degree V6 rods and block deck heights of the different engines.
I don't know the measurements but a company by the name of Burton Engineering would. Find them at burtonpower.com
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 06:28 AM
  #8  
kernel-panic's Avatar
kernel-panic
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 1
From: Yokosuka, Honshu, Japan
Revisiting this thread...

Specialised Engines LTD in England offers 3.0 and 3.1 stroker kits, I didn't find any info on stroker kits @ Burtonpower.com. I have been kind of brainstorming this as well as stroking a 2.9. I found some info on the Burton site about using a 2.9 crank in a 2.8, but you would have to use different rods (2.9 perhaps) and 2.9 or other pistons for it to work - can't remember if it was the Burton site or another that said using the 2.8/2.9 parts would still bring the piston (up to) 1.5mm above the block's deck. I did find this and a couple of other threads here fairly informative in my quest, though
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
7.3 PStroke
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
46
Aug 9, 2016 07:48 AM
dylansf23
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
18
Apr 26, 2014 09:51 PM
shovelhead1
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
51
Feb 21, 2014 10:28 AM
S/C2.8
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
1
Aug 9, 2004 05:07 PM
gt390dk
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
1
Apr 7, 2004 04:44 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.