Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

V6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #1  
adrianspeeder's Avatar
adrianspeeder
Thread Starter
|
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Dover AFB / Harrisburg PA
V6?

Whats up with the V6 chapter in my Haynes manual. Never saw one before and I've been around these 80+ trucks all my life. As far as I know they were never in a bronco so that leaves the F150. Anyone seen em?

Adrianspeeder
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #2  
amish77's Avatar
amish77
Cargo Master
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Seneca, SC
nope. I thought that the only 6 was the 300cu. in. inline. Ran through 96.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #3  
andym's Avatar
andym
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,402
Likes: 38
From: Bonita Springs FL
I've never seen one either. Supposedly it was put in only for a year or two.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #4  
sierraben's Avatar
sierraben
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 24,418
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco, Ca.
Club FTE Silver Member

They supposedly were put in 1982 & 1983 F100.(according to Kragen A/P)

232 c.i. (3.8L) vin code "C".
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #5  
Pkupman82's Avatar
Pkupman82
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 5
From: Muskegon, MI (home)
They did indeed put the 3.8 liter 232 cu. in. V6s in light duty 1/2 ton 2wd Ford pickups in the early 80s. I heard they didn't hold up well, I did see one in a junkyard once...I believe it was an F150 I could be wrong though.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 04:55 PM
  #6  
sierraben's Avatar
sierraben
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 24,418
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco, Ca.
Club FTE Silver Member

I think they were installed in the '82-'83 F100 only.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 04:57 PM
  #7  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 575
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
can you say gutless? i have driven one and a pinto with a 5k trailer will move faster.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 06:46 PM
  #8  
srercrcr's Avatar
srercrcr
Postmaster
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
Ah, let me take you young bucks back a generation........
It was only available in the F100...the lighter weight version of the F series body.
Why? (you ask?) Well, there was a big push to get better gas mileage back then....overdrives were added, etc. All because of the high price of fuel.

Gee, that sounds familiar!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #9  
pfogle's Avatar
pfogle
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 4
From: Oak Harbor, OH
The only problem was that the 3.8 was so underpowered in the F100 that a 302 actually got better mileage.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #10  
sierraben's Avatar
sierraben
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 24,418
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco, Ca.
Club FTE Silver Member

Did the Ford Rangers have that engine?
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #11  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 575
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
i don't think ford had the ranger in 82 and 83
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:04 PM
  #12  
pfogle's Avatar
pfogle
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,140
Likes: 4
From: Oak Harbor, OH
In '82 the Explorer package was an F100, In '83 they started the small ranger. No it was never offered in the rangers, the V6 in '83 would have been a 2.6l.
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #13  
sierraben's Avatar
sierraben
Post Fiend
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 24,418
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco, Ca.
Club FTE Silver Member

Here's a little info on the Ford Rangers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Ranger
 
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:26 PM
  #14  
hllon4whls's Avatar
hllon4whls
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Mandeville, La
Had a friend with an 83 with the 3.8. I was the same way as you when I heard about it. Of course my 80 F100 had the 302.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #15  
BigBear1's Avatar
BigBear1
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Pkupman82
They did indeed put the 3.8 liter 232 cu. in. V6s in light duty 1/2 ton 2wd Ford pickups in the early 80s. I heard they didn't hold up well, I did see one in a junkyard once...I believe it was an F150 I could be wrong though.
Your right, although I have never seen one I know the 3.8 was an option for the 80's Fords, probably only the F-100. The first year for the Ranger compact truck was '83 and I don't belive it ever had a 3.8, I think the V6 in the earlier Rangers was a 2.9. Aren't the 3.8 and the 4.2 in the newer F-150's similar. I know that I've never really heard anything good about either one of them.
 

Last edited by BigBear1; Apr 21, 2006 at 09:57 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE