Best performance Ford engine series?
Why ? Excellent performance design, especially the Cleveland 351 version and Boss 302. Light weight, high revving potential, excellent power/torque per cubic inch and weight. Lots of relatively cheap performance parts.
Old Y block, 272/292/312-ok, but the Y block was replaced by the 'improved design SBF. Old design, not particularly high revving, doesn't compare well to the Ford SB.
I have nothing against the Y series. My Dad had a 312 (Thunderbird V* in Fairlane) and the 292 in a '58 Ford Wagon. They were fine for their era.
FE series. I like the 428. Good engine. Lots of power. Not a lot of performance parts , as it's competition, the BB Chevy.
The 332/352/390. The 390 was an excellent big inch engine for moving big Galaxies around, but it's painful to say, it couldn't compete with the 396/Pontiac GTO 389, Road Runner 383 engines, as far as a performance engine, IMO.
My Uncle swore by 390s, in his 60's Galaxies and big Mercs, and they were good engines, but they pale as a performance engine , compared to the small block Ford in my opinion.
Not many rodders use 'em compared to the sbf series, unless they are restoring an old Galaxie or Mustang GT.
The 429/460. Great engines. I especially like the 460. Compared to the SBF, I think it is an excellent engine as a basis for building a performance engine.
Just one man's opinion, your opinion may differ. But when I open the envelope, the winners are:
1) Small Block Ford V8
2) 460
It appears from the list in the first line you are actually meaning the V90* engine series.This includes the 351W.
The 400 like the 351M as well as the (351C a great engine) are in the 335 engine series.
These 2 engines suffer severe oiling systems and are low HP and fairkly low TQ compared to others.
The 351C animal doesn't fit in with the lowliness of 351M/400 engines.
btw, Ford doesn't call their engines small block or big blocks.
They are engine series.
V90* - 221,260,289,302,351W
FE - 330,360,390,427,428 etc (and a few others)
335 - 351C,351M,400
385 - 429,460
My picks of course are the 289/302, 429SCJ.
The 289/302 for dependability and longevity
The 429SCJ for shear strength and monster Hp/torque
Today, probably the 351W. Will go out to 392 or 393, or even more.
400 hp with a modest build.
Next would be a 460. Never a performance engine stock (dig the 220hp versions in the "head up our *** '70s) it is strong enough to take a major build.
Next best the FE with one of the aftermarket blocks that correct the FE weaknesses. Lighter than the 460, but the aftermarket block situation costs more.
IN the day?
427: won Le Mans, won in stock car racing, won in the Cobra
289: Mustang and Cobra performance.
Boss 302: Trans Am star.
Why ? Excellent performance design, especially the Cleveland 351 version and Boss 302. Light weight, high revving potential, excellent power/torque per cubic inch and weight. Lots of relatively cheap performance parts.
Old Y block, 272/292/312-ok, but the Y block was replaced by the 'improved design SBF. Old design, not particularly high revving, doesn't compare well to the Ford SB.
I have nothing against the Y series. My Dad had a 312 (Thunderbird V* in Fairlane) and the 292 in a '58 Ford Wagon. They were fine for their era.
FE series. I like the 428. Good engine. Lots of power. Not a lot of performance parts , as it's competition, the BB Chevy.
The 332/352/390. The 390 was an excellent big inch engine for moving big Galaxies around, but it's painful to say, it couldn't compete with the 396/Pontiac GTO 389, Road Runner 383 engines, as far as a performance engine, IMO.
My Uncle swore by 390s, in his 60's Galaxies and big Mercs, and they were good engines, but they pale as a performance engine , compared to the small block Ford in my opinion.
Not many rodders use 'em compared to the sbf series, unless they are restoring an old Galaxie or Mustang GT.
The 429/460. Great engines. I especially like the 460. Compared to the SBF, I think it is an excellent engine as a basis for building a performance engine.
Just one man's opinion, your opinion may differ. But when I open the envelope, the winners are:
1) Small Block Ford V8
2) 460
FYI........../352/360/390/427 and the before mentioned 428 are ALL FE motors. And ALWAYS bow your head in respect to the ultimate FE (and maybe ULTIMATE Ford motor) the 427 SOHC!!
If I'm not mistaken, the Y block was replaced by the FE..........the small block Fords supplemented the FE's until the 385 series (429/460) took over big block duties.
Regardless that Ford does not label 'em big or small, your designations are generally accepted.....221/260/289/302/both 351's/400 are small blocks.
The 385 series and FE's are BB's.
Even though I'm not a HUGE FE fan.......historically I think it's Ford's most famous motor.
It won LeMans, was the top motor in AC Cobras, extensive NASCAR and drag racing history and of course; The original CAMMER!!!
If I'm not mistaken, the Y block was replaced by the FE..........the small block Fords supplemented the FE's until the 385 series (429/460) took over big block duties.The small blocks (221 series) came out in '62 for the fairlane. In '63 the 260, then the 289 supplanted the Y block in the Galaxies. I would say the 221 series took over from the Y block. The FE series, 332,352, 390,406 were competition for the chevy 348, 409, and at the time were considered big blocks, IMO, by most consomers and probably Ford.
Regardless that Ford does not label 'em big or small, your designations are generally accepted.....221/260/289/302/both 351's/400 are small blocks.
The 385 series and FE's are BB's.I agree.
Even though I'm not a HUGE FE fan.......historically I think it's Ford's most famous motor.
It won LeMans, was the top motor in AC Cobras, extensive NASCAR and drag racing history and of course; The original CAMMER!!!
Not to take away from the 427 FE, it was an reliable, durable engine that out raced Ferrari. It was a great engine.
And as far as the aurgument that the small blocks outrev the big blocks, better look again. The only time you see small blocks used extensivly in racing is nascar and thats only because they are mandated that way if they could those guys would all be running 500+cid engines punching out 1500+hp turning exactly the same 9700rpm. Go look at nhra top fuel runs 500cid and spins them 9000+ and prostockers run even bigger engines as much as 815cid and spin them closer to 10k. I personally shift my big block at 7200+rpm and have the rev limiter set at 8000rpm.
My basic premise here is that small blocks spin higher rpms is a myth plan and simple and it takes a lot more to get the type of hp and tq numbers you cna get with a big block that runs on pump gas and used to tow your camper, or spin it up double or triple the hp of even a stroker small block with a blower and use it in your race car.
So in my book big block wins hands down. But I will never put down the FE series and all should bow to the 427 SOHC, it's just to bad that engien was outlawed by nascar before it ever got a chance to race I think we would have seen some amazing things done with that engine in later years.
Trending Topics
To be a bit different - the Cosworth BDA series. The 1-8l-2.1l 4cylinders could make up to 650hp from the factory, the RS200 which ran a BDT would hit 60 in 2.1s...
The 2.0l YB Cosworth was also good for 600hp+ - the RS500's anhilated the competition in the World Touring Car Championship
Also the Cosworth DFV has to get a mention - it did dominate F1 for 25 years... 500hp out of a 3.0l V8 ain't bad for 40 years ago...
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Unless you are talking engines worth more then most houses/trailers.
Not to take away from the 427 FE, it was an reliable, durable engine that out raced Ferrari. It was a great engine.
The 427 SOHC would have killed it if allowed.........BUT Chrysler had a liitle known DOHC hemi in devolopment if NASCAR hadn't basically killed off the big blocks for obvious safety reasons.
The 427 SOHC would have killed it if allowed.........BUT Chrysler had a liitle known DOHC hemi in devolopment if NASCAR hadn't basically killed off the big blocks for obvious safety reasons.
Speeds would of been lethal. Tires of the day could not of handled that much power. Even though those engines were designed almost 40 years ago, I think with a bit of work, they would embarrass the modern Ford/Chevy/Dodge current, NASCAR small blocks, quite easily. More sophisticated, power producing designs and of course, the added displacement.










