Notices
Bronco II Ford Bronco II

2.8 vs. 2.9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 09:11 AM
  #1  
s10dragracer's Avatar
s10dragracer
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
2.8 vs. 2.9

I have a 1985 Bronco 2 and the guy who sold it to me said he put a newer engine in it. It doesn't say anywhere on it whether it is a 2.8 or 2.9. It is a 6 cylinder. Are there any quick references on the intake or etc. where I can tell what motor I have so I can change the head?
Thanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #2  
kernel-panic's Avatar
kernel-panic
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 1
From: Yokosuka, Honshu, Japan
Easiest way to tell is to pull the valve cover(s) and see if it has hydraulic lifters or solid lifters. More than likely if you're replacing a cracked head.... it's a 2.9... I'm guessing. Anyone know what casting numbers to look for on a 2.8 / 2.9 to tell the difference?
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #3  
dnachristen's Avatar
dnachristen
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Eagle Point, Oregon
Didn't the 2.9 only come in fuel injection? The 85 has a native feedback carb.

Also, the 2.9 has aluminum heads, as where the 2.8 has cast iron.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #4  
mrshorty's Avatar
mrshorty
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 2
From: UT
That's what I was going to suggest as the most obvious way to tell the difference. 2.9 was always EFI -- never carburated, 2.8 was always carburated, never EFI.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #5  
Ken00's Avatar
Ken00
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,562
Likes: 4
From: South Jersey
The upper intake on the 2.9 says 2.9, also the 2.9 has cast iron heads, not aluminum.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #6  
kernel-panic's Avatar
kernel-panic
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 1
From: Yokosuka, Honshu, Japan
You all do realize that you can interchange the 2.8 and 2.9 intakes, right.... the previous owner might have saved himself some trouble and put the carb on a 2.9.... the only differences between the two are the timing components and the lifters, as best that I can recall
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #7  
Ken00's Avatar
Ken00
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,562
Likes: 4
From: South Jersey
I thought the lower intake wouldn't swap but I never worked on a 2.8, can anyone else comment on the fit???
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 09:35 PM
  #8  
mrshorty's Avatar
mrshorty
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 2
From: UT
Originally Posted by kernel-panic
You all do realize that you can interchange the 2.8 and 2.9 intakes, right.... the previous owner might have saved himself some trouble and put the carb on a 2.9.... the only differences between the two are the timing components and the lifters, as best that I can recall
Interesting. Everytime I've seen this discussed, usually in response to the question, "Can I convert a 2.9 from EFI to carb, the response is, "can't be done unless you have the money (or other resources) to fab your own intake." I would think if it was as easy as changing a 2.8 intake for a 2.9 intake, they would have said. From what I understand, there isn't a lot that readily interchanges between the 2.9 ad 2.8.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 2, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #9  
22mill's Avatar
22mill
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
2.8 vs 2/9 vs 3.0

Someone told me the 3.0 Tauras engine is the same block as the 2.9 Ranger engine. And will bolt after changing intake, is the indeed the same engine?
Seems there are alot more of these avail out there.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #10  
Ken00's Avatar
Ken00
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,562
Likes: 4
From: South Jersey
The 3.0 is NOT the same engine, it's a vulcan, the 2.6/2.8/2.9/4.0ohv are cologne engines.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #11  
AlfredB1979's Avatar
AlfredB1979
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 1
From: Alvin, Texas.
I've heard guys on some of the other well known Ranger forums who had to give up trying to interchange 2.hate and 2.9L components. I don't think the accessory belts even spin the same direction and the ports don't line up on the intakes, among other issues.

Why you'd waste time with either engine...beyond any of us.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 03:06 PM
  #12  
kernel-panic's Avatar
kernel-panic
Posting Guru
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 1
From: Yokosuka, Honshu, Japan
Originally Posted by AlfredB1979
Why you'd waste time with either engine...beyond any of us.
This is almost like asking why someone would put a Chevy 350 in a Porche. Remember, to each their own. As soon as I get the reference materials I need and make a few phone calls, I'm probably going to opt for (re)building my 2.9. I'm half-tempted to physically look at the 2.8 and 2.9 camshafts to see what the specific lobe layout differences are, unless I can find the technical data somewhere. The main reason for this is that Competition Cams makes aftermarket parts for the 2.8, but -not- the 2.9... (my question is, does anyone make a hi-perf. cam for the 4.0??? .... )

My main drawback, other than valvetrain components lacking, in beefing up a 2.9 is the fact that headers are too damned expensive (unless you're doing a 2wd rig). Other than that, there are several things that can be done to these engines -- which is why many people want the book by Sven Pruett "How to build and modify Ford 60 degree V-6 engines"
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #13  
must-be-ford's Avatar
must-be-ford
New User
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kernel-panic
This is almost like asking why someone would put a Chevy 350 in a Porche. Remember, to each their own. As soon as I get the reference materials I need and make a few phone calls, I'm probably going to opt for (re)building my 2.9. I'm half-tempted to physically look at the 2.8 and 2.9 camshafts to see what the specific lobe layout differences are, unless I can find the technical data somewhere. The main reason for this is that Competition Cams makes aftermarket parts for the 2.8, but -not- the 2.9... (my question is, does anyone make a hi-perf. cam for the 4.0??? .... )

My main drawback, other than valvetrain components lacking, in beefing up a 2.9 is the fact that headers are too damned expensive (unless you're doing a 2wd rig). Other than that, there are several things that can be done to these engines -- which is why many people want the book by Sven Pruett "How to build and modify Ford 60 degree V-6 engines"
yes comp cams makes several for the ohv 4.0.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim Luff
Bronco II
0
Oct 24, 2016 04:45 PM
Jim Luff
Bronco II
2
Oct 24, 2016 12:00 PM
lwcassady
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
4
Mar 25, 2005 09:44 AM
28mjg84
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
12
Feb 6, 2005 01:27 PM
oldhalftons
2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 4.0 & SOHC 4.0 V6
4
Nov 1, 2004 12:03 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE