Notices
Bronco II Ford Bronco II

My ideas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #31  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
Originally Posted by bronocIInoob
i dont think its only 120 hp...ive heard from more then one site that listed stats on the bronco II that from the factory, its 140. I dont see why here would be only a 5 hp increase from the 2.8 carborated engine. Sence that was only 115. It is .1 liter and and entirely better induction system, im sure there was more gains.
You're right, it's not 120hp, it was 130bhp Sorry about that but the 2.8 was a sad 90bhp. Just curious where are you getting your hp numbers?

Originally Posted by kernel-panic
I think my point was... when it comes down to it, keep it light and build up what you got. (Re-)building a stock 2.9 and opening up the inlet(s) and outlet(s) some will give you enough power and torque... through the right drivetrain... to get you where you want to play. Hell, if a 2.5L iron duke Jeep motor can do the trails in Moab and on the Rubicon... and it's only 4 cylinders...

*shrug*
I agree that any engine can be rebuilt nicely but if you're going to pull the motor and work it over why wouldn't you get something different like a 4.0L that has a LOT more available for it? The 2.9L is a hurting motor for aftermarket parts in comparison. I‘ve got to agree with you on keeping it light though, that’s one reason I’m loosing 2 cylinders.

Now that I've done the research on finding my turbo 2.3 I'd have to say that if I was going the V6 route for a swap I'd have to get a supercharged 3.8L. They're basically a 5.0 with 2 cylinders chopped off and they make more power then 4.0 with ease @ 230 hp and 330 lb ft stock. Now if you were running that kind of torque you'd have to upgrade the rest of the drive train for sure.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #32  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
My piont was also this, the bronco II has weak axles if you go off roading with bigger tires. The 1990's explorer,and ranger has the better ones, as well as a better suspendtion.So if you take the time so get the front and rear axles of that to fit, if the motor from that is good and it dose bolt right into the 2.9's place then why not do it. If you take that much time and you have the front axle already removed making the swap that much easier to work with then i dont see why you should not do it unless your afraid of wiring. I am most likey putting the btter axles in from a donor truck like this so yeh. Unless i come across one for cheap but has a shot motor then ill just re-biuld and clean up the 2.9. Also the idea of beating ricers sounds awesome, on straight aways at least. lol
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 05:10 PM
  #33  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
also as i found out, the number of cylinders dont matter. Ask Osin...his turbo bronco will have like 220 hp or more. And thats 2.3 i think. The new evo has 350 HP. Its pretty amazing
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #34  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
What kind of cars will you find the 3.8 in? Maybe if i came across somthing like that, i could do that instead.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #35  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
Originally Posted by bronocIInoob
What kind of cars will you find the 3.8 in? Maybe if i came across somthing like that, i could do that instead.
That engine was in the SC thunderbirds from 89-95. The earlier ones made a little less power but still very impressive. Even the early 89 SC made like 315 lb-ft of torque at 2600 rpm. Now that would be a BII that would turn some heads!
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 05:37 PM
  #36  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Alot of qeustions here ok.

1. Are they hard to find

2. Dose the engine ans trans bolt into the bronco II like the 4.0

3. Did they come in 5 speed, if not would a 4.0 trans bolt to and hold this 3.8?
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #37  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
Originally Posted by bronocIInoob
Alot of qeustions here ok.

1. Are they hard to find

2. Dose the engine ans trans bolt into the bronco II like the 4.0

3. Did they come in 5 speed, if not would a 4.0 trans bolt to and hold this 3.8?
Don't know anything about their bellhousings but I just found a couple good running donor cars on ebay for less then 1K. Looks like finding a SC 3,8 is easier then a turbo IC 2.3. I'm sure that with the trans you'll want something tougher anyway, we'll just have to figure out what can be used.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 06:25 PM
  #38  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
OK, here's what I dug up:

1) The 3.8 used a Windsor bellhousing pattern (that equals tons of 5.0 type options).

2) The 3.8 and 4.2 are basically the same engine so any 4.2 trans and transfer case would work too.

I personally think this would be one killer rig. Without a doubt you'd give the 5.0 guys a run for their money. You'd be using less engine room and have less cooling issues. Maybe when the IC 2.3T BII is done I'll have to build one of these SC 3.8s too. LMAO, I have way more ideas then $$$. The more I look at this the less I like the 4.0 swap. Sure the 4.0 is a great motor and physically a better fit but the SC 3.8 has like twice the power stock and has that 5.0 bellhousing pattern. The trans and transfer case options are almost endless.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 06:32 PM
  #39  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Do you think the a 5.0 tranny will bolt up? I dont care about what motor i get at all. All i am afraid of is welding mounts for i have NEVER welded before. I guess if i do do this then i will have to get somone who can. Do you know if the 3.8 will use the 2.9 mounts in the bronco II without modifcation?
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #40  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Also where are you find this info, so i can look too. Both of us can find more if we both search. ( i know what your saying about the ideas to money ratio, mines like 1:15000, with 1 being money and 15000 being expensive ideas)
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #41  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
Originally Posted by bronocIInoob
Do you think the a 5.0 tranny will bolt up? I dont care about what motor i get at all. All i am afraid of is welding mounts for i have NEVER welded before. I guess if i do do this then i will have to get somone who can. Do you know if the 3.8 will use the 2.9 mounts in the bronco II without modifcation?
All Windsor transmissions bolt up including 5.0s.

Originally Posted by bronocIInoob
Also where are you find this info, so i can look too. Both of us can find more if we both search. ( i know what your saying about the ideas to money ratio, mines like 1:15000, with 1 being money and 15000 being expensive ideas)
PM sent
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #42  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
where do i check for PM's hence the name broncoIINOOB lol

Also i dont know if this is what you ment by bolting up, but what i ment is like the mounts for the transmission to the chassis. There are mounts right? or is the motors bellhousing all that dose it. If so do you know if the trans will "fit" in the place of the stock one without getting in the way of stuff.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 06:52 PM
  #43  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
NVM found it....lol
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #44  
OSin86's Avatar
OSin86
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: Racine county, WI
Originally Posted by bronocIInoob
NVM found it....lol
lol, that's cool. 2 more seconds and I was going to post a pic with it circled.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #45  
bronocIInoob's Avatar
bronocIInoob
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
im confused, the pm you send me seems to not have shown up, there was one for boush proformance that was an ad for F-150 superchargers that i deleted, and one the has the date 12-31-1969 that i cant open. what is going on?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE