When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
For the scientist or engineer the CALCULATION of various things is easier with the Metric system but other than that, the English system is easier to deal with for the reasons given in the last several posts.
Have a great day,
Doc
LOL>
Is that so? So why do we have some scientists working in metric and others in SAE? Think of things like the failed mission to Mars (forgot to convert from one to the other) and times when they have built things (PBS show with the DaVinci crossbow).
Today, no matter what we think of it, we need both sets of tools, I just get tired of explaining how to spot the difference on the heads of bolts, to people.
CheapRanger. That's a good point, any time more than one way of doing something is possible, there can be confusion and disaster - take automotive electrical connectors or languages for example.... The failed Mars mission was most unfortunate but with all the possiblities to screw up such a project, its amazing to me that 'Rocket Science' ever works!
One of the changes Britain & Canada went through long ago was the change from the old money system to the decimal one we have now. The old system of Pounds(Quid), Shillings(Bob) and Pence was fun, while the new system is dead boring....
Of course, after a few beers and a good night's sleep, annoying differences in any measurement system can be seen as amusing.
i voted metric because of the ease of less wrenches in my cart and ease of eyeballing the size..nothing i hate worse than a late 80's s10 blazer rolling in for head job because they mixed both together on it
Funny thing, just as many wrenches for either size, maybe more if you go 1mm at a time.
From 1/2 to 3/4 there 5 sizes from 12 to 19 mm there are 8 sizes? That's more guys.
By the way I can't seem to look at the bolt head and figure the metric size any quicker.
Again, more sizes closer together, a 12 looks alot more like a 13 than a 1/2 does 9/16.
That number on the head has nothng to do with the size now does it?
If it has a number on the head, that is a torque rating (bolt manufacturers, not motor vehicle manufacturers). SAE bolts use the grade markings (lines on the heads of bolts).
i meant what i said because if i get a late model gm in to work on..there is usually only 8 -10 -13-15-or18mm and a import is usually 8-10-12-14-and 17mm it just for some reason after all these years working on them everyday i prefer metric to sae..it just seems more simple to me..i work on older cars too and like the starter wires looks confusing because you think its 5/16 and sometimes more than often a 11/32
I think for bolts metric all the way, because it is just easier. Now, what I think would be neat is if they could make bolts that are metric head with SAE threads and everything, so you could swap em out. Reason: make things easier to work on. As far as measurement (which wasn't part of the topic), i like SAE because I know it, but from what I have observed with metric, it is easier. They just need to incorporate something that has a length value close to the foot (I think its the dekameter), and I might switch... maybe.
Just FYI, its decimeter. a length equal to 100mm, 10 centimeters, or 1/10 of a meter. Its approximately 4 inches (2.54cm=1 inch). So it isn't really close to a foot...
I think for bolts metric all the way, because it is just easier. Now, what I think would be neat is if they could make bolts that are metric head with SAE threads and everything, so you could swap em out. Reason: make things easier to work on. As far as measurement (which wasn't part of the topic), i like SAE because I know it, but from what I have observed with metric, it is easier. They just need to incorporate something that has a length value close to the foot (I think its the dekameter), and I might switch... maybe.
Ouch - a bolt with a metric head and SAE threads - how do you identify it? I can see it already - "threads are boogered on this bolt - better replace it. It's metric, 10mm. (Screws 10mm into SAE bolt hole)......Damn, how did I cross thread it? Looks straight to me....".
I voted metric as I have made my living for a number of years turning wrenches, not as much anymore though. I found early that metric is more logical. For years european cars used 8,10,13,17,19 as the most common sizes, The Japanese decided to use 8,10,12,14,17,19. When the American manufacturers started to go metric they threw a bunch of real oddball sizes into the mix, 15,16,18 At the time I bought my 78, yes 1978, Oldsmobile, no normal metric set had these in it. You could get around the 16 with a 5/8" wrench (5/8" = 15.88mm) but the 15 and 18 you were just plain out of luck. And, yes I have worked on many British cars, I have 3 sets of wrenches, SAE, British Standard, and metric. I am crew chief on a vintage class MG midget, which is full of BS fasteners. I was somewhat surprised to find that my 86 F350 is about half and half.
It's logical and not to mention more universal. I've gotten to the point that I usually measure in metric more then SAE too anymore. It's a nice clean system. I prefer celsius too but I haven't accepted Kilometers yet for some reason. It seems like meters is as far as I like to go.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.