Notices
Offroad & 4x4
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

front driveshaft angles?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:31 PM
  #16  
DaveBowman's Avatar
DaveBowman
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
With that much lift on the truck, and the low pinion axle, a custom driveshaft is really your only option. I'm going to guess your probably running a driveshaft angle around 18 to 20 degreese......? with tha much angle your going to need a CV joint at the top of the drifeshaft and possibly one at the bottom too if you want it to be smooth at anything above 15 mph. You might be able to do away with the lower CV joint if you could re-index the pinion to the correct angle, but with that much lift that will involve pulling the tubes out or cutting the nuckles off and rewelding them in a better position. Not something I would do to a Dana 44 low pinion axle. Maybe if it was a Dana 60, I would have it done. But since putting a CV joint on the bottom of the shaft would be a lot cheaper and easier, thats the way I would go so you could have something that would be able to live with your high driveshaft angles. You also will want to get an extended slip shaft, since with a lift that high and angles like that theres probably a lot of length changes in the driveshaft from a compressed spring to a drooped spring.


That won't be that cheap, I'm talking about a driveshaft hitting as high as $600 here, but it will work, work good, and be stronger than what you have now. If that much money is worth it to you to not have the problems you have now, or to not have to worrying about it, cough up the cash and get it done.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 09:23 PM
  #17  
big4rd's Avatar
big4rd
Freshman User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: SE Texas
Why not go with a divorced 205? Lots cheaper than axles. Keep what you have and add to it.
 

Last edited by big4rd; Jan 26, 2006 at 09:24 PM. Reason: can't spell....
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #18  
ivanribic's Avatar
ivanribic
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,945
Likes: 3
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by big4rd
Why not go with a divorced 205? Lots cheaper than axles. Keep what you have and add to it.
To be honest if I had it to do over I would have went to a divorced case and saved myself a lot of hassle and expense. My front driveline is 27º at the t-case and there's not room for a regular 1410 CV because of the pan on the C6 so my driveline will cost over $700 from Jesse. And that's with my C's turned and the pinion angle at zero. The other plus is not having to drop the t-case every time you need to work on your tranny.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:21 AM
  #19  
Russ T. Trombone's Avatar
Russ T. Trombone
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ivanribic
To be honest if I had it to do over I would have went for a divorce and saved myself a lot of hassle and expense. .
I think many of us can say that
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 05:05 AM
  #20  
wyldstallyn73's Avatar
wyldstallyn73
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
I had the driveshaft angle issues with the current trailrider I am building and ended up going with1410 yokes at both the axle and t-case, in addition I also ordered the offset u-joints from Tom Woods driveline, but only used them at the T-case, where the angle was at its worst. Those special joints are 75 bucks apeice but they have a lifetime warranty as long as they are lubed regularly (at 75 each, your damn right I will keep them greased!!) The design of the u-joints gains a pretty sizable amount of additional angle before binding but the downside is that they cause vibrations-- the more angle the worse the vibrations. My rig isn't finished yet, so I cant give a full report on them, but they look as if there will be adequate room to move. My wheelbase is same as fullsize Bronco (116??) driveshfts were both in the 33 inch range, with about 22 degrees of angle sitting level at rest.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 09:46 AM
  #21  
DaveBowman's Avatar
DaveBowman
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ivanribic
To be honest if I had it to do over I would have went to a divorced case and saved myself a lot of hassle and expense. My front driveline is 27º at the t-case and there's not room for a regular 1410 CV because of the pan on the C6 so my driveline will cost over $700 from Jesse. And that's with my C's turned and the pinion angle at zero. The other plus is not having to drop the t-case every time you need to work on your tranny.
reweld the nuckles and the C's, or pull the tubes out and re weld them to raise the pinion
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #22  
Flareside94's Avatar
Flareside94
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
I'd have to call a double CV driveshaft a bandaid fix in this case. It's just covering up the obvious problem elsewhere - the low pinion axle. That's an aweful expensive bandaid too.

You can get another 1/2 or 3/4 ton D44 COMPLETE to swap in there and use with the CV shaft you already have for way less then 500 dollars. Including rad arms if 1/2 ton or linkages and such. A bare axle would be probably 250 or less. If you know a buddy that has one maybe even cheaper.

Or, you could pull the tubes and reweld them as Dave said, or go through all the trouble that Ivan did and cut and turn the C's. But if you do that, you still have the weaker low-pinion setup in the diff. I don't think the ring gear will be the first thing to break, but its still a weakness.

Or, you could swap tailshafts on your transmission, get a new transfer case, and go to a divorced setup. You'll still have the LP, but the angle will be a little less. The rear you can just cut and remount the perches if your rear shaft gets a little too short. Then you have another driveshaft, but I doubt that would be the first one to blow out.

As I asked earlier, how much money do you have into this current axle? Like lockers, shafts, gears, etc.
 

Last edited by Flareside94; Jan 27, 2006 at 10:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #23  
ivanribic's Avatar
ivanribic
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,945
Likes: 3
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by DaveBowman
reweld the nuckles and the C's, or pull the tubes out and re weld them to raise the pinion
I turned the C's. That's the "easy" way to do it, much less hassle than trying to turn the tubes.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #24  
DaveBowman's Avatar
DaveBowman
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ivanribic
I turned the C's. That's the "easy" way to do it, much less hassle than trying to turn the tubes.
Yes you can turn the C's, but if you weld them back on so the pinion is raised up for the CV shaft you will also have the wheel caster dramatically off. A few degreese off is acceptable, but when your talking about a 27* driveshaft angle (maybe 20* with the pinion raised up) thats going to make the truck impossible to drive safley at speed. Thats why if you don't pull the tubes and just cut the C's off, you will also need to cut the nuckles off and reweld them in the correct position.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #25  
proeliator's Avatar
proeliator
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 3
From: Oregon
Uhhh, thats WHY you turn the c's, so that pinion angle is optimal without fubaring up caster. Not sure what your talking about. Ivan's truck rides like a caddy on the hwy, even at unsafe speeds
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #26  
ivanribic's Avatar
ivanribic
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,945
Likes: 3
From: Spokane, WA
Originally Posted by DaveBowman
thats going to make the truck impossible to drive safley at speed.
Sure it will. That's why everything is coming apart here: http://www.supermotors.org/vehicles/...704&original=1

That's why it was also impossible to make the almost 400 mile highway trip in it from Spokane to Portland.

Sorry if there's a hint of sarcasm there but this axle was engineered very carefully and I spent a LOT of hours on it to make everything work right. From the sound of your post I would say you've never done this, never attempted it, and almost wonder if you've ever worked on a steering axle period. You speak of welding knuckles . . . uh, what is thee to weld on a knuckle? The knuckle pivots on what is known as a "C" so the only way to change the angle of the knuckle is to turn the C's. And you don't cut them off as you describe, unless of course you plan to have an axle that's about 5" narrower than it was to start with. There's a very involved process involving a sledghammer, sweat, beer and patience to get the C's off and then some precise measurements involved to get them back on properly. The whole reason for doing this is to CORRECT the caster problem caused by turning a pinion upward. I don't know where you're coming up with this theory of screwed up and dangerous caster because I turned the C's. I set my caster at 6º: https://www.ford-trucks.com/user_gal...=72507&width=0

If you want plenty of reading on how it's done check this thread out: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...d.php?t=358295

I may be just a dumb redneck but please don't assume I don't know what I'm doing when it comes to my truck.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #27  
DaveBowman's Avatar
DaveBowman
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ivanribic
Sure it will. That's why everything is coming apart here: http://www.supermotors.org/vehicles/registry/showmedia.php?id=285704&original=1

That's why it was also impossible to make the almost 400 mile highway trip in it from Spokane to Portland.

Sorry if there's a hint of sarcasm there but this axle was engineered very carefully and I spent a LOT of hours on it to make everything work right. From the sound of your post I would say you've never done this, never attempted it, and almost wonder if you've ever worked on a steering axle period. You speak of welding knuckles . . . uh, what is thee to weld on a knuckle? The knuckle pivots on what is known as a "C" so the only way to change the angle of the knuckle is to turn the C's. And you don't cut them off as you describe, unless of course you plan to have an axle that's about 5" narrower than it was to start with. There's a very involved process involving a sledghammer, sweat, beer and patience to get the C's off and then some precise measurements involved to get them back on properly. The whole reason for doing this is to CORRECT the caster problem caused by turning a pinion upward. I don't know where you're coming up with this theory of screwed up and dangerous caster because I turned the C's. I set my caster at 6º: https://www.ford-trucks.com/user_gal...=72507&width=0

If you want plenty of reading on how it's done check this thread out: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...d.php?t=358295

I may be just a dumb redneck but please don't assume I don't know what I'm doing when it comes to my truck.
OK I understand what your talking about now, don't need to get all defensive. When you guys were refering to C's I thought you were talking about the wedges welded on to the axle tube that the C bushings and radius arm mount on to. I have never heard the inner nuckle reffered to as a C before. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #28  
proeliator's Avatar
proeliator
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 3
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by DaveBowman
When you guys were refering to C's I thought you were talking about the wedges welded on to the axle tube that the C bushings and radius arm mount on to.
Dana 60's don't use radius arms.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #29  
DaveBowman's Avatar
DaveBowman
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by proeliator
Dana 60's don't use radius arms.
Yes but the 78 F150 that the original poster has does have radius arms (or at least it did)
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 09:43 AM
  #30  
piperig78's Avatar
piperig78
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Appleton, WI
I'm playing around with about $1200 But i have numerous other things on the truck i need to do, so about $600 or so on the front end is about all i want to spent. The tire size is 39.5, Right now the pinion angle is 25 degrees. I thing I will try to find a 76-79 D44 High Pinion. Because If the low pinion is weaker thats not good, and then I'm dragging my $500 drive shaft through the mud and the last thing i want to do is screw up a $500 driveshaft. As for money stuck in to the low pinion there isn't much just new seals, the axle was free.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE