When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yep, there are plenty of examples of successful displacement on demand, in use for many years. The new camaro will be fast and get great fuel economy - that car will once again put the hurt on mustang.
with both intake and exhaust valves closed and air acting like a spring....I would think that it takes SOME horsepower to continually recompress those cylinders....even though theoretically you might get something from the "spring".....nothing is 100% efficient
the valves don't shut. how do the valves close if the cam lobes are still riding on them? the only way they could shut is with a camless system. which would uses electric actuators on each valve.
Cmon! Both valves are shut on the compression stroke anyways. So all you gots to do is cut the fuel. You could easily alternate which cylinder gets the fuel. Though I dont think it would run very smooth if you did that. The cylinders would be firing anyways without deactivation. So worst case scenario 4 last to long. The other 4 would wear out at the normal rate. I dont see a problem. As long as it is reliable and seamless I would be for it.
i dont know its just seems pointless to me git a V8 and not use all the cylinders if gas milage is want u want git a dam honda. PLUS i dout ya'll will see a stick shift in these v8-4 bangers for a long time hinse taking the fun out of driving
but hey its just my opinion
i dont know its just seems pointless to me git a V8 and not use all the cylinders if gas milage is want u want git a dam honda. PLUS i dout ya'll will see a stick shift in these v8-4 bangers for a long time hinse taking the fun out of driving
but hey its just my opinion
There is no difference in power. If you need it you get it.
Do you really need all 8 of those cylinders pounding away cruising at highway speeds? If you have to pass someone they turn back on faster than you can blink an eye.
If you think this is bad wait until Displacement on Demand Hybrid pickups start hitting the market.
im not gona spend 40 + grand when i can get a sho taurus (which i am) for under 5 grand and get 20+ miles and still have a stick shift thats wat im doin
i will stick w/ having all my cylinders firing and wearing down AT THE SAME TIME
The point of fuel injection is that you have almost no cylinder wear, if any, over the life of the engine as long as you don't do something like ignore check engine lights all the time. That is why a throwaway engine like the Northstar even makes it to 100,000 miles even though it has no meat for an overbore job.
Fuel washing oil off cylinders....a thing of the carbed engine days. Rejoice all!
I don't know about the Dodge system but I'm sure it's nearly identical to the GM system (of which I am familiar).
The SAME 4 cylinders get "shut off" each time the MDS or DoD (active fuel management) is enabled. The fuel delivery and ignition system for those cylinders is EASY to do due to the fact that the PCM controls them anyway...simply don't activate the coil for that cylinder or the fuel injector.
The valve train on the other hand is a little more complicated. The lifters for those 4 special cylinders have a lifter inside of a sleeve. The sleeve rides on the camshaft lobe. There is a locking pin inside the assembly that locks the lifter to the sleeve when DoD oil pressure is absent. When the PCM commands DoD, oil pressure is routed to the release channel of the lifter sleeve, thus unlocking the pin inside and allowing the sleeve to move independently of the lifter. A spring inside the sleeve keeps the lifter bottomed to eliminate noise.
Yes, a small amount of cylinder pressure is trapped in the cylinder while DoD is activated but this is only to keep any vacuum from pulling oil past the piston rings and causing plug fouling. This is done by deactivating each cylinder at the very bottom of the compression stroke.