Notices
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator 1991-1994, 1995-2001, 2002-2005, 2006-2010 Ford Explorer

Tps function in EEC IV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #1  
savagefan's Avatar
savagefan
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
Tps function in EEC IV

Can a TPS ona 91 xploder be so bad that it can stop the ignition from firing? if so can it be explained? Thanx.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 12:01 AM
  #2  
Jharger's Avatar
Jharger
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
No. Jerry suggested the crank sensor right? TPS has nothing to do with ignition (directly), only A/F mixture. What makes you think that? Have you gone through the ignition circuit completely at this point? Crank sensor through the coil/wire/plugs? You don't even need the PCM to get a spark. The crank sensor, ICM and coil all have enough info to get a basic spark.

Now, load is affected by TPS. Load changes the spark curve, the SPOUT signal from the PCM to the ICM that fine tunes the spark curve/advance. Good question but I don't think it can possible stop a spark all together - might screw up the timing and get the car to run like crap - but also would have worse affect on the A/F mix.

Maybe the TPS is not allowing any fuel?
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 05:29 PM
  #3  
savagefan's Avatar
savagefan
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
I know, it doesn't make sense but a sharp rap on the the TPS whilst running killed the spark, it is still dead.
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 05:58 PM
  #4  
Jharger's Avatar
Jharger
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
That's a different story. Maybe the system check with Key On disables spark if the TPS doesn't respond with expected feedback. Sounds extensive but they did write some complicated program. Have you checked for codes again since this event?
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #5  
savagefan's Avatar
savagefan
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
It gave an 18 - spout circuit open. Which I verified as i get a nice .5 vac input to edis from vrs but no tach sig out. All wires from and to EDIS rang out fine. Think i will disconnect battery and toss in a new tps. 3 weeks ago a bad bap sensor killed the spark. It shares a common source with TPS from the pcm. Very frustrating this one.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 12:25 AM
  #6  
Jharger's Avatar
Jharger
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
There is a SPOUT shorting bar near the ICM - is that still there? I don't know why Ford needed this, maybe to troubleshoot without the PCM interferring. I got a SPOUT open when I had the SCT chip in - from KOEO test. SCT was clueless about this by the way - morons. But of course my shorting bar was still there. What year/motor truck is this again? I have a short memory. I'll check out the wiring diagram tomorow. Must be a 91 or 92 with a BAP in it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 10:25 AM
  #7  
Jharger's Avatar
Jharger
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
My PCM pinnout diagram isn't matching up to the autozone wiring diagram. I see what you mean that the BAP and TPS share the same reference voltage pin. Still don't see the correlation to spark. Would be intersting to see if there are any codes and KOEO/KOER test results. I wonder what a new PCM would do.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #8  
mrshorty's Avatar
mrshorty
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 2
From: UT
Giving out 2 digit codes and with a BAP, it almost has to be a '91 (my '92 gives off three digit codes and doesn't have a BAP). I also took and unplugged the TPS on my '92. Still started and ran ok (idle was a little high and the CEL came on). I really don't think a bad TPS would prevent you from starting the engine. (For that matter, a fault in the BAP shouldn't prevent it from starting, either).

Another observation: we have a fault that appears to be jumping from component to component (BAP to TPS to ???). This suggests to me that the components themselves aren't at fault, but that something in the wiring or elsewhere is the real cause.

Bad grounds do funny things (once I unbolted and/or unplugged the fuel pump ground to clean it and the wipers went crazy on me until I put it back together). Are you absolutely certain the ICM, PCM, engine block, and ignition coil are all properly grounded?

My code lists suggest that a CM 18 is an erratic TACH signal rather than SPOUT (though I expect they are closely related). TACH signal is generated by the crankshaft position sensor (CKP). Are you certain the wiring between the ICM and the CKP is good? Is the CKP good (while not real common, I have heard of them failing)?

Those are a few of my thoughts. It will be interesting to see what you determine is at fault.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #9  
Jharger's Avatar
Jharger
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
Yeah it's a 91. Said so in first post. I was too stupuid to look.

Savage - you said you get .5 VAC, sure it's not DC voltage? Make sure your Fluke meter is on DC not AC.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #10  
savagefan's Avatar
savagefan
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
AC voltage, unless I missed one, all grounds are squeaky clean. Spout shunt is in place it is there to provide a base timing check. Engine can run with or without it. I'm stumped. Have a new from Ford TPS, battery is disconnected, after din dins will go out and try it, not confident though. Thanx for the input so far.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #11  
savagefan's Avatar
savagefan
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
Tried the new TPS no go. For the record, all other sensors have been swapped with known good ones even the ICM and coil pack. What is really frustrating is you can see a faint spark jump thru the neon bulb inline spark tester as it is cranking, so signals are getting thru just not enough power. Methinks this is one for Sherlock Holmes. By the way, did these things have a factory security device in 91? if so, how would I recognize it?
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #12  
Jharger's Avatar
Jharger
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
I don't think so Sherlock. In 1993 when I bought mine, the dealer offered an alarm but it was aftermarket - no Ford options. So I doubt they had one in 1991.

Like Mrshorty said, you checked all grounds right? Does sound like a grounding issue. Next step would be a new PCM. I bought a spare on eBay for $40 a while back just in case I ever run into something like this.

Also - there's an octane shorting bar which I believe will give you 10 degrees base timing when removed. I'm not sure how SPOUT jumper plays but sure, if you remove it, the PCM then has no influence on the spark curve.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #13  
mrshorty's Avatar
mrshorty
Postmaster
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 2
From: UT
All other sensors? That's a lot of money spent on guessing. Looks like it's time for some real diagnosis. I propose one of 2 options:

1) Pay someone to diagnose this for you. Of course, you have to get someone good. You don't want someone else who's just guessing as well.
2) Go to the library with a pocketful of loose change. Many libraries, in the reference section, will carry Motor or Mitchell manuals. Locate the appropriate "engine performance and troubleshooting" (or equivalent) manual. Locate the circuit test for CM18 on a '91 4.0 engine. Read it, study it, photocopy it, then take it home and see what you can come up with.

FWIW, I located my gtest.pdf file for a '95 Explorer. Among the first tests they suggest for a no start is to see if the TPS is seeing Vref. If the computer isn't generating Vref, then they have you figure out why the computer isn't outputting Vref (Vref is also used by the BARO sensor). Are you getting Vref out of your computer? Another thought, if you clear the CM 18 and try to start the engine, does the CM 18 come back immediately or not?
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #14  
Jharger's Avatar
Jharger
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
I was kind of wondering about that reference voltage to. It sound be 5 V DC not AC. So that AC reference is a bit confusing. Looking like PCM to me.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #15  
savagefan's Avatar
savagefan
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
Ten four I've tried it with both shorting bars in and out one and both, no go. All grounds polished. I've tried a PCM from a 91 aerostar 4.0 not exact match but no go either. The thing that is getting me is the weak spark thru the tester. The coils are firing albeit faintly my other coil pack makes no diff.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE