When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ive got a 81 f-100..with a 302 3spd auto. I just rebuilt the motor, and it runs pretty good...but im sure i could be getting better performance from my stock motorcraft 2150 2bbl. I know it needs a rebuild, because of the hard starting...unsteady idle, etc. But i would prefer buying a new carb, and maybe rebuilding the one i have already for fun when i have time. If i do go for a new carb, it wouldnt be anything big...maybe even a new or professionally rebuilt motorcraft 2150. But i heard Holley made a carb as a replacement for the motorcraft. What would be the differences between the motorcraft and the holley? difference in power? Mpg? reliability? price?
Any suggestions would be great..thanks
p.s the 302 is mostly stock besides an Rv cam, headers and 3'' exhaust.
use the motorcraft. very simple,reliable and lasts a long time. the 2100 is a well designed carb, the off road guys use it and like it better than most 4bbl truck carbs. the kit is cheap only 12.00 to rebuild them and they have no gaskets to leak below the air horn like on a holley.
look on the drivers side of the carb and look for a number like 1.08, or 1.21 etc...that will tell us the size of the venturi's and the cfm...that would affect my descision if it was mine
if it turns out to have enough cfm, i would use it over the holley
i just went out and checked my carb...its a 1.08- 287cfm. Ive decided to go with the motorcraft, but cant decide between the 287 or the 350 cfm. How much of a difference would these two carbs make for power and gas mileage? any thoughts appreciated.
your 302 is pretty stock. 350 cfm is more than enough. too big you will loose low end torque. finding a 350 cfm 2100 carb is hard few were made. i found one on a 400 in a 72 station wagon.
A 350cfm would be much better than the 287. I ran a 350 on my 300-6 with an Offey intake, and it was fine clear up to 5500rpm. These carbs were usually on 360/390s and 351m/400 trucks, from 68-82. I have heard that the earlier ones had problems with casting porosity, but I haven't been able to confirm that.
this forum is full of ' problems with rebuilt motorcraft carb', or'problems with rebuilding motorcraft carb' , if you have a choice between a new holly or a rebuilt motorcraft, especially if you are rebuilding it yourself and dont have a lot of experience , I would go with the Holly. you can get 'lucky' with your rebuild , if the motor craft has never been overheated , etc......... my 2c's,bob
Hello, did you use an adapter plate on your 400 to install your holley 350?
If it had a Motorcraft v2 on the 400 then he would not need an adapter as it should be a bolt on.
Now what maybe an issue is any transmission linkage that hooks to the carb.
BTW you know this post was from 2005 right?
Dave ----
If it had a Motorcraft v2 on the 400 then he would not need an adapter as it should be a bolt on.
Now what maybe an issue is any transmission linkage that hooks to the carb.
BTW you know this post was from 2005 right?
Dave ----
Yes I knew it was from 2005. It answered most of my questions so I thought I would leach on.
I see i do have a kick down so I may have to figure that linkage out.
Thank you for answering my question.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.