When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
so im looking for a new truck and due to the fuel prices im looking for a v6 can anyone tell me if ford made a 97' or newer V6 extened cab 4x4 f150 with or with out stepsied bed? or am i waisting my time looking
I agree with polarbear, the 4.2 v6 is an engine that should have never been put in a full size pickup, much less a 4x4. The 4.6 v8 would be a better choice. It also gets about the same mpg as the 4.2 liter.
For those of us who built their first engines before we even thought about the metric system - that would be about a 289, which is one heck of a long lasting engine.
Why would one look at a 4x4 for fuel ecoonmy anyways? NOt trying to offend, but that's like saying "I want a fridge to keep my beer cold, so I'll buy an industrial size freezer". If you have a true need for 4x4 you won;t be happy with anything less than a 5.4. The 4x4 works are heavy and the 4.6 is going to be really doggy. I test drove a few 4.2 2wd 5 speeds that were nice trucks, and weren't really dogs. I don't think it would have handled a 4x4 driveline very well though. We get ~16 out of out '04 E150 with a 4.6, and it's loaded ALL th time.
I got a 3.7 V6 in my new Dakota but it doesn't get great gas mileage. It is rated at 15-18 but I found out after I bought it that I could get the same mileage with a small V8. I should have had a V8!
If you need a pickup, or 4x4, you also need enough engine to get it out of it's own way. The cost of a little more gas is nothing compared to the payments for a new truck.
Think about it... let's say a 5.0 v8 gets 18mpg and let's assume a 4.2 6 gets 20. (In reality this probably won't happen because the 6 has less power and you'll have your foot in it all the time to compensate) At 12000 miles per year, $2 per gallon, that's $1333.33 for the 8 vs $1200 for the 6. For $133 a year you get more power and more towing with a V8. Plus the V8 will probably last longer because you'll have your foot in it less, causing less wear.
If you really want better gas mileage... ditch the 4x4. Most people don't actually use it, so you suck gas pushing a 4x4 all the time. Plus a 4x4 costs more than a 2wd. That $1000 option is worth 8 years of gasoline. Also a stick does a little better than a auto.
They made one- the question is, would you want it. The 4.6 V8 gave better power and mileage, IMO, and that's what I'd be on the lookout for.
I agree, the V8 makes more sense: more power, same or better mileage. I only disagree on one point: Ford never built a 4x4 full-sized supercab pickup with a V6, in any year. The inline 300 was last used in the '96 F-150, and the '97 Supercab 4x4 came standard with the 4.6 V8. I sure remember that year- there was a real shortage of 5.4s, so of course everybody wanted one. We had to "force-feed" a lot of 4.6s, just to sell trucks.
i'd like to take the time to thank all of you for your input reading all of you comments and those to come has mad me lean more towards a v8 knowing that they gas mileage is the same in a 4.6 as a 4.2 v6 any further input is appreciated for i do not plan on getting a truck until the new year....... happy holidays to all
I agree, the V8 makes more sense: more power, same or better mileage. I only disagree on one point: Ford never built a 4x4 full-sized supercab pickup with a V6, in any year. The inline 300 was last used in the '96 F-150, and the '97 Supercab 4x4 came standard with the 4.6 V8. I sure remember that year- there was a real shortage of 5.4s, so of course everybody wanted one. We had to "force-feed" a lot of 4.6s, just to sell trucks.
One of the captains I worked with offshore bought off a 4.2L SCab with a 4.2L from his pops.
It gets 14mpg's with 3.73 rear gears. You could get decent mpg's with a 4.2L, but with a 3.08 rear in all likelihood, which kills towing ability and basically makes that a car with a bed on it. Not always a bad thing, but there are tradeoffs in life....like the guy asking me what it would take for a 4.6L swap because the mpg's would be similar. I told him, he liked the idea, but he may just live with what could have been.
Of course, with used trucks and SUVs taking a buge hit for obvious reasons, even a 5.4L truck could be a great deal these days, if you need the utility of such a vehicle.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.