When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
In reading various posts about fuel economy and such, I notice that many quote their economies on the highway without using the cruise, as if using cruise will hurt your highway mileage.
Why is this? I always get the best mileage when I use the cruise, instead of "hotfooting" it and trying to keep a certain speed. Without the cruise, I can't keep a certain speed, and am always speeding up or slowing down. With the cruise, I stay at 73 mph up and down hills, and the rpm stay stable.
So, am I mis-reading what you guys are trying to say, or do you really think that cruise control hurts highway fuel economy? If so, could someone explain why it would hurt the mileage?
I felt like in hilly areas the cruise would let too much speed bleed off before accelerating there by causing it to downshift. Whereas I can slowly feed in more throttle and keep it from downshifting up the hill. I used to live in flat Florida and am a cruise control junkie but where I am now has too may rolling hills and I don't use it as much.
I use cruse all the time on the interstate. I found that if I set the cruse on the flat the truck will hold the speed without downshifting when it gets to the hill without a problem. This is even more true when I reprogram the computer, plus for me it adds another 2mpg.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.