1978 - 1996 Big Bronco

Sponsored by:

5.0 /302 same thing?

Reply Subscribe

Search this Thread

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 01:47 PM

#1

jgc2521

Thread Starter

|

Elder User

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 535

Likes: 0

From: New Roads, La

5.0 /302 same thing?

title says it all j/w tryin to do the KBB on this thing

Reply

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 01:55 PM

#2

andym

Post Fiend

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 19,402

Likes: 38

From: Bonita Springs FL

Same thing.

Reply

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 02:46 PM

#3

skelator84

Senior User

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 111

Likes: 0

From: san angelo tx

yes 5.0 reffers to 5 liters and the 302 is cubic inches. although it is not exactly 302, ford likes round numbers.

Reply

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 02:56 PM

#4

jgc2521

Thread Starter

|

Elder User

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 535

Likes: 0

From: New Roads, La

i was thinking that. just amking sure i wasnt halucinating or somethinf

Reply

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 03:02 PM

#5

skelator84

Senior User

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 111

Likes: 0

From: san angelo tx

Its a good question, took a while for it to sink in with me also. once you learn stats its easy to remember. 5.8liter is 351 cubic inches and so on.

Reply

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 09:00 PM

#6

G Lube

Senior User

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 212

Likes: 0

From: Easton PA

Is there a formula to convert one to the other and vice versa?

Reply

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 09:19 PM

#7

Streetgang

Elder User

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 693

Likes: 0

From: Hoboken, NJ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by G Lube

Is there a formula to convert one to the other and vice versa?

Here you go........
5 liter = 305.1187192 cubic inch
1 liter = 61.0237438 cubic inch

1 cubic inch = 0.0163871 liter
302 cubic inch = 4.9488933 liter

You can click on this link for the conversion chart I used.
http://www.onlineconversion.com/volume.htm

Reply

Trending Topics

BREAKING: Ford Drops 6.8L V8 and Standard 6.7L Power Stroke from 2027...

136

10.2k
FX4 Real-World Use

29

740
New F-250 owner, coming from GMC/thoughts

26

1k
Reverse Lights Not Working

27

430
Pedal Monster 7.3

27

936

Old

Oct 12, 2005 | 10:03 PM

#8

G Lube

Senior User

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 212

Likes: 0

From: Easton PA

What makes that interesting is if you were to round off both the exact "literage" for both the 300 and the 302 they should both be 4.9L engines. I guess ford should have thought a little better when they made these 2 engines so close in size.

Reply

FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Verdad Gallardo

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Joe Kucinski

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Brett Foote

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Michael S. Palmer

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Joe Kucinski

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Brett Foote

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Joe Kucinski

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Joe Kucinski

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Michael S. Palmer

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Joe Kucinski

Old

Oct 13, 2005 | 02:10 PM

#9

greystreak92

Lead Driver

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 9,182

Likes: 12

From: Gateway to the West

Club FTE Gold Member

Since the 302 is a derivative of the original 289 the CID numbers were upped to sound "bigger" when the shift to the 302 over the 289 was implemented.

I still miss my 7.7 litre Cadi once in a while.

Reply

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

What happens if we believe in things?

Greywolf

General NON-Automotive Conversation

19

Apr 28, 2012 04:50 PM

Supercharger for a 390?

lakecityg

1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks

21

Sep 28, 2009 04:21 PM

mgazak

General NON-Automotive Conversation

1

Jun 19, 2002 06:52 PM

Reply Share

First
Prev
1 / 1
Next
Last

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.