'89 Ranger "Project"
To sum up --
(1) The truck (a 2.9 ltr V-6 automatic) has a bad "lope," "surge," "stutter" (whatever you want to call it) under acceleration, to the extent that you sometimes have to shift down to 2nd to keep the revs up or the engine will die. Strangely enough, performance has been getting marginally better over the past six months (my mechanic uses the truck regularly for runs to the local parts house). It has its good days and bad days, but is definitely driveable. You just wouldn't want to depend on it in traffic or on the freeway, because it always has to be coaxed to run.
(2) The engine is a new rebuild, the computer is new, the distributor/alternator are new, spark plugs & wires are new and just about everything under the hood has either been replaced or checks out ok. My mechanic friend is an oldtimer with his own backyard shop. Although he doesn't have a lot of high tech test equipment, he has a substantial local reputation as a great seat-of-the-pants diagnostician. And he says that this truck has stumped him like few others in recent memory.
(3) At the urging of several people in this forum, I purchased a code reader several months ago and had both my son and my mechanic run some diagnostics with it. The results were predictably puzzling -- eleven error codes in the initial KOEO phase, but no clearing code (10 or 11) and no second series of codes. Instead, the code reader eventually repeats the first of the eleven error codes again, and then stops for good. The codes, for what they're worth, are as follows: 637, 123, 327, 654, 553, 552, 565, 558, 622, 626, 624. Most of these codes relate to circuits above or below recommended voltage, or solenoid/circuit faults. None of them seem to have any obvious relation to the symptoms displayed by the truck. (These codes have been pulled a number of times with the same results every time.)
(4) We haven't removed and cleaned the injectors yet, but according to my mechanic they don't show any normal signs of plugging or wear (he has a testing method, but I can't say what it is). He also wondered out loud during one conversation if there could be a problem with the intake manifold (due to the rebuilt engine not being reconnected properly), but he's skeptical that this would explain the truck's problems. Also, he reports that he hasn't been able to detect any vacuum leaks using the standard propane torch method.
Any suggestions, ideas, theories would be most welcome!!!!!
--btilland
Dave
He said today that he had put together test "kits" for Ford and Chevy cars and when someone brings a car in that is not running properly, he will replace things like throttle position sensors just to see if they make a difference. Apparently he has replaced the throttle position sensor in the Ford, but he may have re-connected the old one when the new one didn't produce any improvement. This seems a little "single-focus" to me, because there could be a number of things causing problems, including the throttle position sensor, so just replacing it alone might not show a significant improvement. Also, I would think that you would want to replace the sensor and then pull the codes again -- and I'm not sure he has done that. My feeling is that if you are getting a 123 code and it's the lowest one in the code series, there must be SOME problem associated with the sensor. But maybe that's naive.
He also said that he was confused by your comment about checking the wiring to see that it was "connected back properly," because the sensor was pretty much like a light bulb (his words) and one end just screwed into a socket. (I haven't seen it so I can't verify this.) However, I can see that when you say "check the wiring," you might not mean the socket/receptacle itself but the wiring going into (or coming out of) the socket. Is that it?
He also seemed confused about measuring the resistance and seeing that it "transitions smoothly." I know that he has an ohm meter (and uses it), but I'm not sure that he knows what and where to measure in this situation, although I could be totally wrong about this. I DO know that he doesn't have a clue about the "transitions smoothly" comment, so perhaps you could clarify that for me and I will relay it (gently) to him.
The tps is a resistor that moves when the throttle is moved it will change resistance between ground and the wire that goes to the ecm. They will sometimes get bad spots and not send a smooth changing signal to the ecm.
IF the test are not done properly, you may get a false error code.You need to get someone to run the test properly to read the codes and work from there. Sometimes the cheaest mechanic isn't the cheapest...
Dave
As for the general process of pulling codes, I believe that we are following proper procedures. I know that my mechanic knows how to pull codes, and when my son pulled the codes at a later date he carefully followed the instructions in the manual that came with the code reader. We have pulled the same codes five or six different times, on different days, so I'm inclined to say that they are accurate -- or the best that we can do under the circumstances.
Some months ago, my mechanic actually took the truck to a couple of "real" shops in our small town, where professional courtesies are extended to him and he can ask for the occasional favor. The truck was hooked up to two different professional diagnostic machines and, according to my mechanic, "almost every code in the book" showed up on the readouts. The shops also tested for vacuum leaks, and neither of the "real" shops was able to come up with a clear diagnosis or point my mechanic in a constructive direction. I believe that one of them tentatively suggested faulty injectors, but my mechanic didn't feel that the diagnosis had much conviction and he still doesn't think that the surging behavior of the truck points to injectors. So I know what you are saying about cheapest not always being best, but this truck has had more than one person scratching his head.
Trending Topics
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Dave
Irishguy, I recall reading up on TFI modules a few months back and I believe that that the module in the truck is new (along with the distributor, but I'll verify that. Coincidentally, I found a webpage just a few minutes ago that gives resistance test values for a TFI Module (and I think it's the right one, because I recognized the EEC-IV part name for the distributor. I've heard that TFI modules can be quite unreliable, and even new ones have been known to fail -- or to be faulty right out of the box. The site indicates that the TFI module is easy to remove and test, but then it goes on to talk about something called a "Hall Sensor" in the distributor, which can go "bad" but is very difficult to remove. However, if the whole distributor is new (or a rebuild), odds are that this sensor isn't the problem.
Dave
I listed all the codes in my very first post in the string (along with a lot of other stuff!!!) That's where the 123 code came from. There were eleven in all, and as I said in that post, the reader just stopped after the eleventh, didn't clear (no 10 or 11 code) and then repeated the first code in the series again instead of pulling a second set of codes (which the instruction book said was supposed to happen. We pulled the codes 5 or 6 times, on two different days, and that's the way they came up every time.



