Powerstroke not too durable
And in reference to someone mentioning the Dana diffs used in ford not built by one of the big 3 but for the big 3 actually Dana is a division of Chrysler along with new process.
Ford, and dodge have never built thier own diesels with the exception of the 4 cyl diesel used in the 80s D50 dodge ram mini trucks which was built by mitsubishi a chrysler owned company, and that was a joke of an engine. (I better add that Ford never built an engine for use in a vehicle to be sold in the united states I don't actually know about the little 4 cyl diesels used in the rangers overseas)
most of hte components used on these vehicles are made by someone other than the company that sells the trucks, take the frames they are made for ford by a company in Iowa and sold to ford. Radiators for the most part are made by moline radiator (which does happen to be a ford company but sells to dodge, and chevie also), and I haul exhaust system parts for Tenneco/walker which used to be a GM company but is now independent, we haul parts for the GM cars, and truck as well as international, and volvo trucks, and Harley davidson, and also the exhaust used on your harley edition F series trucks are all made by this company. (actually had several pallets of the exhaust tips for the harley edition trucks on a load last week infact).
Now to further confuse the issue Tenneco doesn't build all of the mufflers that are used in these exhaust systems because I pick up several times a week at a Homer Donaldson plant to take mufflers to the plant that makes the system, and the hangers and flanges are made by canadian companies. this is the same company that makes the exhaust flanges for the ford vehicles we drive, the big 3 are so intertwined that it's actually hard to find were one stops, and the other starts
I was once asked when I was working as a mechanic for a chevy dealership (and drove my ford ranger to work everyday



By the way:
dwood22,
Welcome to FTE.
Check out our Guidelines:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/guidelines.html
And the Read First: notices at the top of each forum, it will help you understand and navigate FTE easier.
See you around...
BigF350<o =""></o>
I doubt it - because you can't, its darn quiet...
The PSD is the actually the loudest of the diesels now, but I happen to like the sound of it personally.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
One of the advantages of getting an F-350 in Australia is that it comes with a single 4" stack from the factory - all vehicles over 4500kg (4.5tonnes) GVWR must have a vertical exhaust.
I love the sound upon planting my foot at 50mph - in 6th with a trailer behind - and just listen to it slowly wind up.
I don't personally like the 6.0 psd, or the duramax for some reasons I will outline a little later in this post but I didn't just use a blanket statement like that so if you have specific research please fills us in so anyone looking can understand what you mean.
My specific dislikes are as follows duramax personally I don't like alum heads on a diesel although so far this hasn't been a problem of any great extent like I originally figured it would be it's just a dislike, not of the alum heads as I run them on my race engine but on diesels I don't like them. Also on the duramax and this comes from talking to a lot fo owners of them, and talking to a couple of fleet owners with 20-35 trucks each, and it seems to be a crapshoot on them for power and performance with them you will have one that is the best performing thiing you've ever driven, and the next one won't pull itself out of a wet paper bag and gets terrible mileage. of the fleet owners I talked to had 25 of them all the trucks were setup identically since they ordered them all at the exact same time, and infact I believe something like 12 of them were sequential serial numbers he said a certian portion of them were super powerful, got great mileage, and had no problems whatso ever, then there was a few of them that were just average, but there was 8 of them that would bog down pulling an empty trailer and cut the fuel economy in half with that empty trailer, and they weren't getting all that good to start with in relationship to the others. and GM couldn't find anything wrong or different with them.
6.0 psd I researched them when I thought about trading my 2000 off, and talked to my wifes nephew who works on them for a living and it was his feeling that they weren't built very well, and after he talked to one of the engineers that helped in the designing he learned that they were built to be a throw away engine, and were produced to reduce production costs as much as possible the heck with reliability things like cyl walls are thin, they used hypereautic pistons instead of forged, basically everything in them was the cheapest parts (you know kinda like the space shuttle 2 miilion moving parts built by the lowest bidder instead of hte lowest with the best part) plus with the original toothing pains of knocking the injectors out I have been very leary since then. now beyond what I talked to him about and the other problems I have found them to have by reading on here I can't give real specifics, other than to say when Ford only keeps an engine in it's lineup for a couple of years there is usually some problem that they don't talk about and a 4 yr run is pretty short. and the fact that is was only out 2 yrs before they annnounced that it would be replaced in 07 makes me doubly suspicous I am just hoping that they do a lot more testing before they release the next one, cause they didn't do nearly enough on the 6.0
Fact: Those teething problems are now fixed, and the engine is reliable.
Fact: The Duramax had troubles when it first came out.
Fact: Those teething problems are now fixed, and the engine is reliable.
Fact: The Duramax and 6.0L Powerstroke are good engines (now).
Fact: The Cummins and the old 7.3L Powerstroke are better engines.
Definition of better in this post's context:
Better : (bet-ur) adj. : Able to do everything the other engines can do and do it for 300,000 miles with no major repairs and decent maintenance due to the strength and ruggedness of the fundamental design.
My proof.
Opinion
PM rods are garbage
Fact
The PM rods in our test 6.0 survive cylinder pressures that blow the heads off the block. Shortly, most performance rods will be PM
Opinion
The boost pressure that a cummins can handle means it is a tougher engine
Fact
The real measure is actual cylinder pressure.
Opinion
The I-6 is a stronger design
Fact
The I-6's weakness is the very long crankshaft "twist" and intake manifold design. The block is cast thick to handle the imbalance. The V-8 has two rods per throw but only one is firing at a given time.
My opinion
The Cummins has a lot more aftermarket support, that is why it enjoys the success that it does. The 6.0 is a new engine.
To finish
As a test to the "experts" on this board, what is the I-6 imbalance that is inherent in all inline engines and where is the nodal point for the 2nd degree harmonics. Also, as a locomotive engineer I can tell you that almost all locomotives built are V-16's and V-20's. for a reason. None are Inline.
Pay close attention to the answers readers and You will see what I mean
No offence to anyone but the truth is important
Joe
Last edited by RedRage; Sep 17, 2005 at 05:53 PM.







