Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

6.0 vs 7.3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 08:59 PM
  #16  
tn mac's Avatar
tn mac
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
That is the whole point a diesel should not have to run the high rpms to get the pulling power,and that is why many are wondering what the life of the high reving 6.0 will be.The I.H. DEALER has told me that ford is pushing the engine past its limits and it will not run past 200k. Which is the real reason ford is changing to the new motor in 07 not the cleaner running engine story they want us to believe.
 
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #17  
Kep4's Avatar
Kep4
Jäger
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 5
From: Northern Arizona
I have to agree that you're truck has an issue.

I pulled my 3,000 lb trailer, Family of four and 1,000 lbs of gear over the Grapevine North and South with ease. I was doing 75 mph up the first part of the Northbound grade and a car pulled in front of me and I slowed to 55. I got around that car and accelerated up the Northbound Grapevine back to 75 with no problem! It didn't even downshift. That was with 1,000 miles on the truck.
Some posting here may have been on the boards for 1 1/2 years but don't pay much attention to their doom and gloom.
Have your truck checked out and enjoy!
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 01:24 AM
  #18  
Daryl Hunter's Avatar
Daryl Hunter
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad, California
That's right, I've pulled my 10,000 lb toy hauler up and down the grapevine from Carlsbad to the track at Buttonwillow and had no problems at all keeping up with the traffic.

The truck pulled my TH trailer up and over the grapevine almost easier than my F-150 did when it was pulling a 5x10' utility trailer with only two bikes and gear.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 08:21 AM
  #19  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
I have gone over 12k passes with no problem of "power" at all.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #20  
rblomquist's Avatar
rblomquist
Senior User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 426
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Daryl Hunter
That's right, I've pulled my 10,000 lb toy hauler up and down the grapevine from Carlsbad to the track at Buttonwillow and had no problems at all keeping up with the traffic..
Daryl, have you weighed your trailer on a scale? The reason I ask it I'd say 10,000lbs is conservative, I bet you're toting a lot of weight than that at hwy speeds with no problem.

I have a ww 26' toy hauler and have scaled it at the truck stop at 11,500lbs. That's loaded with full water (120 gallons), 1 full size quad, 1 med size quad and a 4 stroke MX bike.

I can't wait to get an SD so I can fly up the western mountain passes :
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 10:40 AM
  #21  
olfordsnstone's Avatar
olfordsnstone
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 3
From: Other side of the sunrise
Daryl, I'll bet you're the guy that the song "hot rod lincoln" was referencing. I think that was based on the grapevine, wasn't it?
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #22  
diesel_dan's Avatar
diesel_dan
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,951
Likes: 512
From: Foothills, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
hmmm, trolling....

I can't imagine the 6.0 feeling slow compared to the 7.3. We run a scmt in tow safe mode in our 7.3 and I drove the Dodge CTD HO and the PSD 6.0 back to back -- there were certainly some comparisons to be made there, but when I jumped back in my chipped 7.3, it felt like a rag was stuffed in the intake. Compared to Either truck! I'd take the new one in -- maybe an early varible vane turbo failure??

While I love my 7.3, I'd never pit it against any of the new diesels, Ford, Dodge or Chevy -- bone stock against my mild chip, they'd have my lunch...
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 10:57 PM
  #23  
tazo's Avatar
tazo
Elder User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: northern,california
"hot rod lincoln" was refering to san pablo road in the east bay of san francisco bay area. My good friend played with the band Commander Cody.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 01:29 AM
  #24  
caveman's Avatar
caveman
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
I had a 02 f-350 7.3 without a chip it's lag was brutal. with the superchips 80hp module it was pretty good. Now my 05 f-350 6.0 ,pretty close to my old truck when it had the chip. To me both engines stock would be no comparison. If you think the 7.3 had more anything there is something wrong with the 6.0 you have.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 03:04 AM
  #25  
150ford's Avatar
150ford
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,378
Likes: 3
From: nebraska
Can someone explain to me to me how Ford is pushing the engine beyond its limits. To me it seems like people adding modifications to that would be doing that not Ford. A poster here mentioned this. An IH dealer told him this. I wouldnt take much stock in this,
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 03:23 AM
  #26  
99bajakid's Avatar
99bajakid
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by caveman
If you think the 7.3 had more anything there is something wrong with the 6.0 you have.
how about reliability, simplicity, longevity, better MPG, the list goes on and on... The only thing the 6.0 has over the 7.3 is hp/torque, but none of that means a damn when the 6.0 is broken at a mere 200k miles
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 03:35 AM
  #27  
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
FTE Emeritus
In all fairness to the 6.0l, I don't believe it has had a chance to prove itself in the long term durability/reliability stakes yet.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #28  
olfordsnstone's Avatar
olfordsnstone
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 3
From: Other side of the sunrise
Even when the 6.0's start reaching that 200000 mile mark, it may be hard to determine by then which ones were chipped or tuned at one time in their lives. I think this will be a factor to consider when trying to be fair in determining the durability/reliabillity of these engines. It would have to be a list of one owners to get sure data for a survey.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #29  
caveman's Avatar
caveman
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 99bajakid
how about reliability, simplicity, longevity, better MPG, the list goes on and on... The only thing the 6.0 has over the 7.3 is hp/torque, but none of that means a damn when the 6.0 is broken at a mere 200k miles
How do you know what the 6.0 will be like at 200k. I've had both and would take the 6.0 any day over the 7.3. But as always everyone has their opinion.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #30  
99bajakid's Avatar
99bajakid
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
wow im a dick, sorry about that pissy post i was in a really bad mood.

I dont think the 6.0 is very good though, i could have been nicer about it..
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE