1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

open loop vs closed loop throttle response

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-29-2005, 11:24 PM
geezer95's Avatar
geezer95
geezer95 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
open loop vs closed loop throttle response

My 95 351 w/mass OBD-1 Bronco has better throttle response at 1500 rpm and up when in the open loop condition. This truck is no slouch when in the closed loop condition , but I can notice a difference. I have installed a Bassani cat back and "Y" pipe, JBA headers, 56mm BBK TB, Edelbrock performer truck manifold, MSD coil & 8.5mm wires, Ford performance racing 19# injectors, K&N drop in filter W/ homemade cold air tube, and it has new IAC, TPS & WCT sensors, and EGR. The timing is set at 10 deg BTDC and I have no codes from the ECM. I disconnected the battery to reset the computor, and have put on over 250 miles since , so the computor should be adjusted. Now, what would be the next step in diagnostics or adjustment to improve it"s closed loop throttle response. BTW the TPS reads .996 volts in the idle position, with a steady increase to 4.57 WOT.
 
  #2  
Old 03-30-2005, 10:36 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
i would bump your timing up to 12*btdc with spout connector removed. that should wake things up big time. whats your plug gap at. should be .55 also what plugs are you using?
 
  #3  
Old 03-30-2005, 04:37 PM
geezer95's Avatar
geezer95
geezer95 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kemicalburns, I have Autolite sparkplugs (A24), your basic copper core, gapped at .044. Now at the risk of being redundant, are you suggesting that I time the engine at 12 deg BTDC with the spout connector off and then keep it off? Sometimes I've been known to get easily confused, but it's a simple case of no stupid questions. Also, I'm going to back probe the ACT sensor and see if it is operating in the correct parameters. If you have any other tips I would appreciate it.
 
  #4  
Old 03-30-2005, 04:53 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
time to 12*btdc with spout removed, check then reconnect spout connector and your done. also i hight suggest you regap your current plugs to .55 or buy new plugs if others are old and cap to .55 . the msd coil requires at least that much gap.
 
  #5  
Old 03-30-2005, 08:57 PM
geezer95's Avatar
geezer95
geezer95 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My MSD coil is the Blaster TFI #8227, and is rated at 48,000 volts , no bigger in dimensions than the stock unit it replaced. This weekend I'll pull the plugs and gap them at .055, they'er only a month old. According to the fordfuelinjection website ACT values chart, My ACT sensor resistance reading is a little low, and I'm going to replace it.
 
  #6  
Old 03-31-2005, 08:30 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
sounds good. keep us posted. I have that same coil waiting to be installed.
 
  #7  
Old 04-01-2005, 09:26 PM
geezer95's Avatar
geezer95
geezer95 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kemicalburns, I bumped the timing to 12 deg BTDC and regapped the plugs to .055, and now the engine is definitly more responsive. I bolted on a lot of performance parts and the fine tuning will bring the full potential out. Well now, down the road I'll be interested in getting some better flowing cast iron heads and I'll be once again be asking for some advice. BTW when I was installing the Eldebrock performer intake this Cali 95 351 bronco I see has a roller cam. Don't know how this will affect my choice on aftermarket cast iron heads.
 
  #8  
Old 04-04-2005, 08:20 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
shouldnt affect much really.what heads did you have in mind. you might just look into some E7's that have been worked over alot. it would be cheaper and a direct swap. wouldnt need to change anything tune wise.

late
 
  #9  
Old 04-04-2005, 10:46 PM
geezer95's Avatar
geezer95
geezer95 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Kemicalburns, you got me interested in finding out more on the E7 heads. Is there a company I can get a set from who has done all the porting, put in new valves, ect., and all I had to do is bolt them on? I got to be able to pass the Cali smog so I'll just put on better flowing heads and not replace my roller cam.
 
  #10  
Old 04-05-2005, 09:41 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,265
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
I would ask around to some of the offroad shops or mustang shops in your area. our heads are the same as what the mustangs run so they are plentiful. might even check into corral.net or stangnet.com's classifids.

late
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbo300six
Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide & Water/Methanol Injection
365
01-25-2019 02:33 PM
boggerted
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
07-14-2017 12:10 AM
Jimmy Crab
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
09-18-2016 04:19 PM
FightinTxAg
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
04-24-2015 07:29 AM
looking
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
11-21-2007 06:44 AM



Quick Reply: open loop vs closed loop throttle response



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.