Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Windsor VS Cleveland???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 02:19 PM
  #1  
finnly56ford's Avatar
finnly56ford
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Coleman, AB, Canada
Windsor VS Cleveland???

I'm choosing what engine I want to put in my '56 and so fer i have chosen to go with a FORD 351, rather then a chev ,but i just have gotten too confused if i should go with a windsor or a cleveland. my plans are to go with more low or mid ranged torque then horsepower. I'v been hearing alot of different things from people around my small town about either but I still can't decide. so any outside help would be well appreciated.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
tacson's Avatar
tacson
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 208
From: Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Club FTE Silver Member

Here is my .2 cents. I had a 53' with a 351C with 4 barrel heads. Man it would run. What I ended up finding out was that the motor with it 10.5 compression ratio and no Stall converter was to much for what I wanted to do, cruise and enjoy highway cruising. The 351W is a good motor. Although like the Cleveland no longer in production some of the parts interchange with the SBChevy of the 90's, the Ford 5.0. If you so chose you could inject a W. A Cleveland could be done as well if you modify either a 351 W or make a one off intake. I have been told a 351C with 2 barrell heads will do fine on the street. Whatever you decide consider bolting up a AOD to either. I know your engine will thank you and you will be glad you did in the long run.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #3  
imlowr2's Avatar
imlowr2
Postmaster
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 2
From: Santa Clarita
The 351W and 351C are totally different animals. The Cleveland has much bigger heads, valves, exhaust ports, etc. The intakes, etc are not interchangable with the 351 W. The Windsor is similar to the 289 and 302 in design, yet the block is slightly taller than the 302's. The intake is also different because of the taller block. Some guys use the 289/302 camshafts which are interchangable, to run high lifts and durations that most 351W cam grinds don't offer. The Cleveland is an excellent motor for mid range and top end performance. With gears, these engines are difficult to beat. They're also built well and run very hard. The 351W has a lot of torque for off the line performance and the top end isn't bad either. IMO, the Cleveland has more possibilities if your planning on building a super motor to run hard. The 351W is basically a good running reliable engine. I do love the look of the 351C. The heads and valvecovers definitely stand out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #4  
huronfarmer's Avatar
huronfarmer
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: South Central MN
i agree with imlower....the 351c and m are more in the same boat than the 351W, the windsor is in a boat all by itself. i've got a 351W w/ rv cam in a 77, and its got all kinds of torque, low or high end....the only thing i really plan to change is putting a 4 barrel edelbrock on top of it......
if it was me, id stick with a windsor, because ive had good luck with it....its all a matter of "what" you want the engine to do "when"
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #5  
51ford fan's Avatar
51ford fan
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 2
From: Seattle WA.
Originally Posted by tacson
Here is my .2 cents. I had a 53' with a 351C with 4 barrel heads. Man it would run. What I ended up finding out was that the motor with it 10.5 compression ratio and no Stall converter was to much for what I wanted to do, cruise and enjoy highway cruising. The 351W is a good motor. Although like the Cleveland no longer in production some of the parts interchange with the SBChevy of the 90's, the Ford 5.0. If you so chose you could inject a W. A Cleveland could be done as well if you modify either a 351 W or make a one off intake. I have been told a 351C with 2 barrell heads will do fine on the street. Whatever you decide consider bolting up a AOD to either. I know your engine will thank you and you will be glad you did in the long run.
This is the first time I have ever heard of any parts enterchanging between a SBF & SBC other than an aftermarket air cleaner. I learn something new almost every visit to this forum. Could you please elaborate !!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 08:33 PM
  #6  
51ford fan's Avatar
51ford fan
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 2
From: Seattle WA.
I keep hearng comments about the 351C being a mid and top end performance engine. I purchased a 1970 Torino with a 351C, it seems like a 100 years ago. That sucker had so much power and torque that it would smoke the rear tires off the line for as long as you kept your foot in it. Probably the most powerful and wildest engine I ever owned over the years.

Rod
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 09:02 PM
  #7  
TBucketJack's Avatar
TBucketJack
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, AZ
If you're working with a budget than the 351W is the only way to go. The Cleveland is a wicked engine but along with it is the $$$$$ that its going to cost you. Good Luck and Happy Truck'in
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #8  
tacson's Avatar
tacson
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 208
From: Murfreesboro, Tennessee
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by 51ford fan
This is the first time I have ever heard of any parts enterchanging between a SBF & SBC other than an aftermarket air cleaner. I learn something new almost every visit to this forum. Could you please elaborate !!!

51,
Sorry to have confused you. I was calling the 5.0, The small block Chevy of the 90's. Once every one including the aftermarket got on board. The speed parts and there availability for a 5.0 became like the Small Block chevy's have been all along. Sorry for the confusion. Even now the 5.0's are priced where folks can build them for not a whole lot more than building the SBC.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #9  
darkman's Avatar
darkman
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 3
From: Pensacola Florida
Both are excellent engines and when similiarly built produce almost identical numbers. That didn't use to be true but the Windsor now has a ton more parts than the forgotton Cleveland. There is no way you can make the Windsor look as good as the Cleveland. The Cleveland drips tertesterone and bleeds Ford blue. Even if someone doesn't recognize it they know it is a beautiful piece. Do you have a Cleveland? They are getting a little hard to find especially if you are looking for a 4 bbl quench chambered head but you really don't need that. Two bbl heads are great for the street and help low end torque. Austrailian heads are the hot ticket and can be bought easily. You can use either engine and achieve what you want but only the Cleveland will turn on the majic when you pop the hood.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 10:22 PM
  #10  
Randy Jack's Avatar
Randy Jack
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 2
From: Riverside, So Cal
Club FTE Silver Member

Finnley -

Welcome to FTE, noobie!

I have a 56 with a 351C in it. I bought a remanufactured long block with the 2V heads and had a Comp Cam (268H), lifters and springs installed and got the whole thing warranteed for 1 year from a company called Recon. I added headers, an Edelbrock Performer manifold and their 600 cfm carb and a Mallory Magnetic Pulse Distributor. Total investment = $2400. I run an FMX 3-speed auto tranny and a 3.50:1 Ford posi 9 inch. Hauls BUTT! Great motor. Tons of tire spinning torque. Lots of fun. Its a daily driver and freeway cruiser. The only thing I would do to it now is add an AOD for the highway.

On the other hand, you can't find any new after market stuff for it. You'll be a junk yard dog to add power steering and AC. Nobody makes brackets. It gets a lot of comments at the cruise nights and its not even dressed out much.

The Windsor offers a lot of aftermarket goodies including serpentine pulleys and EFI, etc. You need to choose either nostalgia or todays modern upgrades. Both engines are good torquers with a lot of midrange hp.

Pictures in my gallery. (click on my name in the post header, pick "View Gallery" from the dropdown menu)

Have fun. Let us know your choice.
 

Last edited by Randy Jack; Feb 27, 2005 at 10:31 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #11  
51ford fan's Avatar
51ford fan
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 2
From: Seattle WA.
Could someone please post a picture of each engine side by side. I haven't, or didn't realize there was that much difference in their appearence. I was always told, or read the only difference was the 351W had the fuel pump bolts horizional and the 351C pump bolts were vertical.

Rod
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 02:06 AM
  #12  
bootie's Avatar
bootie
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
aftermarket goodies are readily availible for the clevo - just look towards australia and new zealand - Cylinder Head innovations do some awesome cleveland alluminium heads as does proline - with america you phased the clevo out and stuck the windsor into everything - not so down under - they went from the windsor to the clevo and theres enough fruit around if you know what to look for. best bet if your not sure whatr you want build a clevor - windsor block - cleveland heads - go with the australian 2v closed cham,bers - price motorsport in the usa do all the adaptoirs for manifolds
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 03:57 AM
  #13  
halfdone's Avatar
halfdone
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: Queanbeyan Australia
I had a 351 Windsor in a 56 a few years ago

I had a 351 Clevo in a 53 many years ago

I am putting a 351 Clevo in my 48 F1 I am building........no contest which is the better motor for a truck, low down torque of a clevo with 2v heads beats the windsor any day

No contest as far as factory bits go. The clevo heads flow heaps better than any factory windsor heads, and flow = horsepower and torque

If you go aftermarket heads (=$$$) then they are mostly equal, but the Australian aftermarket "3V" heads have the best flow bench numbers I have seen this side of a BBC or Hemi.

If you can find a good clevo, go for it.

I buy clevo manifolds on ebay in the US all the time. Dirt cheap compared to here. Just received a tunnel ram for my 48, which I will fit with dual imco 425 propane mixers.

Scored a pair of 2V clevo edelbrock torkers for US$65 the pair the other day.....like Christmas all over again.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #14  
fatfenders56's Avatar
fatfenders56
Cargo Master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 5
From: Tucson AZ
guys, I have a 351-c in my 31 Vicky and "drips testosterone" is the best description I have ever heard for it,Polished weber 48's, polished block and heads, it is candy purple with HPC headers and it never fails to wow the crowd, and it runs like a SAA, 351-C, no other choice for me. The 2v heads are the way to go for the street, they produce their torque at low r's compared to my 4v ramair heads and with the low first gear in an AOD and some 4:11's out back they are SWEET! WHEW, I get excited just talkin about it!
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #15  
airwick51's Avatar
airwick51
Senior User
25 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Norway
I have a 351 W in my 55 F-100 and have really looked hard into the possibility of putting on Cleveland 351C-2V heads. It just seems to be some minor machining of water passages on the heads and a wider intake manifold to make a Clevor.Or am I mistaken?? Will I have problems with my 1976 351W-2V block?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE