Notices

Compression ratio and Deck Clearance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 01:51 AM
  #16  
highboy 74's Avatar
highboy 74
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: WA
I am a little confused about this so called quench. What if I dedcided to run a quench of .005". For this example I would assume that I was using a piston to deck height of about +.036" (therefore the piston would be .036" out of the hole) and that I was using the Felpro gaskets of .041" thus a .005" quench. And what if I had aluminum heads that were CC'd to give me 10:1 compression at the .005" quench with flat top pistons. What is the benefit of a tight quench? I guess I just don't get it. The compression ratio is still 10:1 so what am I going to gain with a tight quench? What if my quench was .010" but still had an overall compression ratio of 10:1 would that change anything? Please enlighten me. Thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 07:14 AM
  #17  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by highboy 74
I am a little confused about this so called quench. What if I dedcided to run a quench of .005". For this example I would assume that I was using a piston to deck height of about +.036" (therefore the piston would be .036" out of the hole) and that I was using the Felpro gaskets of .041" thus a .005" quench. And what if I had aluminum heads that were CC'd to give me 10:1 compression at the .005" quench with flat top pistons. What is the benefit of a tight quench? I guess I just don't get it. The compression ratio is still 10:1 so what am I going to gain with a tight quench? What if my quench was .010" but still had an overall compression ratio of 10:1 would that change anything? Please enlighten me. Thanks
For one thing? why would you even try to run a .005" Quench when I had said in an earlier post the best for rodding is .035 to .050" ?? If your running Flat top Pistons and a zero Piston to Deck height and a Fel-Pro .041" gasket thats going to put you right in the middle of that range allready.. Therefore your head chamber cc will dictate what compression your engine will make..

And even with my build..with the head design I have (quick burn Chambers)
I'am running a -22cc dish..Because my heads on the 521" Cobra are only 72 cc's in the chamber...if I ran a flat top piston my CR would probably be in the 13 to 13 range and way to much for the street!!

I dont even Know of antone who has attemted to run a Piston on the street .036" out of the hole...I know some guys running .005" to .010" out on Race only engines....

My suggestion is run a zero piston to deck height run the .041" fel-pro and buy a set of after market heads where the CC in the chamber will get you around 10 to 10.5 to 1 CR.. and go with that.. also allways watch out for piston to Valve Clearence!! Depending on the cam lift and configuration of the head chamber...you may have as I did..Fly cut the pistons to clear the Valves?

Good Luck on your Build...

Russ
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #18  
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by highboy 74
I am a little confused about this so called quench. What if I dedcided to run a quench of .005". For this example I would assume that I was using a piston to deck height of about +.036" (therefore the piston would be .036" out of the hole) and that I was using the Felpro gaskets of .041" thus a .005" quench. And what if I had aluminum heads that were CC'd to give me 10:1 compression at the .005" quench with flat top pistons. What is the benefit of a tight quench? I guess I just don't get it. The compression ratio is still 10:1 so what am I going to gain with a tight quench? What if my quench was .010" but still had an overall compression ratio of 10:1 would that change anything? Please enlighten me. Thanks
The idea is that the gasses in the flat spot will be shot out into the chamber at high velocity when the piston approaches TDC. This will dramatically increase the burn rate. The rapidly flowing gasses dramatically reduce the tendancy for the engine to develop hot spots and ping. In addition, the quicker burn requires less timing and evens out the required timing between the cylinders. Now you may not want to run .005" of quench because the piston / rod might stretch a little at high rpms and hit the head. Generally .020" to .050" is good.

Edit: Here's a good article on quench.
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 01:01 PM
  #19  
"Beemer Nut"'s Avatar
"Beemer Nut"
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,658
Likes: 4
From: "Islander"
Tight quench

As stated above with rod stretch at high rpm's also bearing clearance, thermal expansion, piston rock and carbon buildup will reduce your calculated clearance. With resized old rods the wrist pin to crank pin center line distance can vary between rods as well as wrist pin to piston top on pistons. Measure your deck clearance on all 8 holes, if off you can correct with rod and piston juggling. Piston swaps only if you have all bores and pistons the same to maintain correct piston to bore clearance.
Carl....=o&o....
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 01:37 PM
  #20  
Putt's Avatar
Putt
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 1
From: Colville, Washington
Nice info, Rusty!!! That helps explain things in plain english. I ended up with .005" in the hole which resulted in 10.04:1 CR on my 428. It will ping only under high load/low RPM. I did have to reduce timing slightly from the 390 before.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #21  
polcat's Avatar
polcat
Elder User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
Good information Russ, i have been looking for some information on Quench. I was talking to Mayhem Bob and he tole me the same as far as the measurements of .030-.060 is the best. I plan on building my race engine .005 out of the hole, but I will install all eight pistons and measure each one individual. this will help with my compression which should be 12.4 to 1. and should give me room for expansion of the rod and heat with a .041 head gasket. And hopefully no ping with 110 octane.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 06:49 AM
  #22  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Hey Pol....are you going to run aluminum heds on your build? You wont have any problem with detonation with torco 110....at 12 to 1 cr..

You Might even be able to get away with what I'll probably do..Is Mix 3 or 4 gallons of 110 in my 15 gallon fuel cell and get away with it....I'll only be running 11.15 to 1 with Kaase heads..... My quench should come in at .038" .... I would go closer..but running those fast burn heads..I'll have to notch the Dish pistons for Valve clearence also....

Good Luck on your build!!

Russ
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 05:10 PM
  #23  
polcat's Avatar
polcat
Elder User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
NO I am going to run cast Iron heads so I have to watch what octane I use. 110 should be fine. Yeah I am trying to get close to I should have a quench of .036 figure in a little streach maybe should be good. Porbably will change to Aluminum heads next year, got a tight budget this year.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #24  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Pol..Just a Sec... Let me run your CR thru my Sim.... BRB..
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 05:46 PM
  #25  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Ok..depending on timing you should be able to mix your own and come up with 104 Octane (actually Performance) rated over 100..But thats another story...

And that would be at engine temp of 180*
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 08:54 PM
  #26  
polcat's Avatar
polcat
Elder User
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
My heads are C8AEH that have been milled .015" so the actual compression is around 12.25-12.40 my pistons have a slight recess. timming will play a big role in tunning this engine at the track. I figured either 114 or 110 lead should work. My dad use to have a 289 13 to 1 compression with cast heads and ran 110 octane and did not have any problems. I got a DD2k and have been researching this build for a long time finally getting started with it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 05:45 AM
  #27  
RapidRuss's Avatar
RapidRuss
FE "Freakin Expensive"
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,461
Likes: 4
From: Smith Mountain Lake, VA
Club FTE Silver Member

Well Pol...Sounds good to me!! Good Luck!! And "Rock and Roll"

Russ
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 10:59:05


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE