Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

SCMT Mileage Test Today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 12:14 AM
  #16  
Dan Vac's Avatar
Dan Vac
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
From: West MI
First of all patriot thank you for your service. I spent 1 year over there way before it was cool to say you did. You will love your truck. Get your self a programmer of your choice and do a lot of reading here. I have a 2004 CC S/B 4x4 custome rims, and tires, diablo predator, mac intake. It Pulls like a freight train.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #17  
R1ZOOM's Avatar
R1ZOOM
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: USA
I wish I got 22 mpg stock, mine doesn't even come close. I guess before I put my 315's and leveling kit I got better though. The lie o meter used to read about 18.6 at 75 mph on the highway, and in the high 16's around town. Now it reads in the 11's on the highway and 10.low in town. I need to get my speedo recalibrated for my tires and see what the lie-o says, since it was pretty close to my hand calculations before.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #18  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by Bigham
Thanks for the test. Oddly mine gets better milage in the HP setting then in economy. I mean 2.5 to 3 more mpg. In the summer I was getting 17.3 to 18 hwy/city in HP and did my own test in economy and got 15.4. I tested two tank fulls in economy when fuel was on the rise. Then I could not waste any more fuel. I also am very pleased with these numbers in HP mode.

Vic,

Do you think that if I got my truck reflashed that the mileage would increase? I have heard many stories of milage droping off from doing this but, with this new flash I have heard just good things with MPG increase?

Eddie
Different driving habits can cause differences in fuel economy.
Very often, if the performance setting is used in moderation, it may give you your best mileage.
It depends on how your drive, how you tow, and what kind of load you tow.

If your truck runs well and you are getting 18 MPG, I wouldn't try to fix what isn't broken =0)
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #19  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by R1ZOOM
I wish I got 22 mpg stock, mine doesn't even come close. I guess before I put my 315's and leveling kit I got better though. The lie o meter used to read about 18.6 at 75 mph on the highway, and in the high 16's around town. Now it reads in the 11's on the highway and 10.low in town. I need to get my speedo recalibrated for my tires and see what the lie-o says, since it was pretty close to my hand calculations before.
If you gear it (differential gear) to match your tires, you may see your mileage go back up.

Taller tires = greater load (engine load).
More engine load = more fuel.
If you get a lower axle ratio (numerically higher), you'll be under less engine load during acceleration and will usually get better mileage.

It doesn't make sense from an RPM standpoint, but believe me, it makes sense from a fuel consumption/load standpoint.
Load affects fuel mapping more than RPM.
It's better to be a couple hundred RPM higher, but be under less engine load.
You'll use less fuel.

So for you guys who have 36" or 38" tires and a stock gear.......upgrade that axle ratio to 4.56, 4.88 (or whatever)and get your mileage back!
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #20  
Toreador_Diesel's Avatar
Toreador_Diesel
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,246
Likes: 761
From: Houston, Texas
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by t_j82
I definately wouldn't complain! The best mine does stock is 12 city, 13.3 combined and 15.5 @ 70 mph hwy. I miss my 7.3, maybe it had a little less power but at 2.30 a gal I'll take the mileage difference over a little power.
How many miles do you have on your truck?

If you have very few, your truck is still being broken in and still needs time to develop. Better mileage comes with time and good break-in habits.

However, if you have alot of miles and thats what you're averaging, you may have a problem.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 06:07 AM
  #21  
sweet03cobra's Avatar
sweet03cobra
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
From: anchorage, alaska
Originally Posted by Dan Vac
First of all patriot thank you for your service. I spent 1 year over there way before it was cool to say you did. You will love your ...truck. Get your self a ...programmer of your choice and do a lot of reading here. I have a 2004 CC S/B 4x4 custome rims, and tires, diablo predator, mac intake. It Pulls like a freight train.
I appreciate that. I'm excited to get it. I guess I will just have to keep counting down the days until I can run the beast.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 06:14 AM
  #22  
t_j82's Avatar
t_j82
Elder User
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: NW Montana
Originally Posted by Toreador_Diesel
How many miles do you have on your truck?

If you have very few, your truck is still being broken in and still needs time to develop. Better mileage comes with time and good break-in habits.

However, if you have alot of miles and thats what you're averaging, you may have a problem.
10k exhaust filled miles so far.
 
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #23  
Aarkie's Avatar
Aarkie
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 4
I do not think thank that 80 miles would be far enough to get a good test for milage. Your looking at 4 gallons at 20 mpg. if your fillup was off by a quart it would make a 1.3 mpg error. From what I have read it also takes a few driving cycles for the computer to learn the new program to drive right. I would thank that you would need to program it, drive a few days, then check mpg on a longer trip. I believe that the numbers that you came up with are correct but unless you filled to the except same spot each time they are off, the shorter the distance the more they can be off.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 07:09 AM
  #24  
PSD6litre40's Avatar
PSD6litre40
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
very good point Aarkie..........
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 07:16 AM
  #25  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by Aarkie
I do not think thank that 80 miles would be far enough to get a good test for milage. Your looking at 4 gallons at 20 mpg. if your fillup was off by a quart it would make a 1.3 mpg error. From what I have read it also takes a few driving cycles for the computer to learn the new program to drive right. I would thank that you would need to program it, drive a few days, then check mpg on a longer trip. I believe that the numbers that you came up with are correct but unless you filled to the except same spot each time they are off, the shorter the distance the more they can be off.
Exactly.

It takes a very **** method of testing (and some expensive equipment) to test with any accuracy.

For the end user, the only way to help eliminate SOME of the margin of error is to do the test over many miles and drive cycles.
It will still only be somewhat accurate, but you'll at least be able to see a pattern.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95 F150 Dude
2004 - 2008 F150
7
May 1, 2011 09:42 PM
E40
Computer Chips & Tuners
1
May 27, 2007 06:14 PM
79-400-POWER
General NON-Automotive Conversation
13
Apr 28, 2007 07:02 PM
blankman
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
3
Sep 9, 2005 10:15 PM
Heiny
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
17
Jan 4, 2004 10:08 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 10:59:05


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE