Notices

Question for Freightrain...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #16  
Scouder's Avatar
Scouder
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
From: Evanston, WY
Club FTE Silver Member

Here's the setup. 4600lbs, actual tire diameter of 36", 5.38s, Detroit locker rear, ARB air locker front. The TC is divorced, so mounting is a non-issue. It will be very rare to do a standing start under full power on asphalt. Even then, I plan on engaging well under the powerband and doing it in such a manner as not to "spike" the drivetrain. This thing is not a dragster. I never intended it to be. It will, however, have to prove itself against somebody, sometime, and I want all the advantage I can get when that happens. When I'm out in the hills that close ratio in the Richmond 5 would be perfect as well.

What do you use for a shifter on your Richmond?

-Scouder
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 12:11 PM
  #17  
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Club FTE Silver Member

Well, the race car has a V-gate shifter, but I have a std pattern design for galaxie. I inherited from same friend. It came with tranny when he bought it. We got him a V-gate shifter and he donated the shifter to me for all the installation work(ya, I'm the resident tranny expert in my group!). I also got another V-gate with Nash I just bought.

You can use a V-gate shifter on the street, I used to years back, but I don't want to put that BIG of a hole in the floor. A std shifter comes thru a 3" dia hole, the V-gate style needs a hole the size of a SHOE BOX!!! They are bulky, but for racing there is NO match.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #18  
Scouder's Avatar
Scouder
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
From: Evanston, WY
Club FTE Silver Member

Hmmmm. Initially I was leaning toward the R5, but started considering the TL because I was worried about strength. You are running 11's on slicks in a 4000lb car with one, so I'm back to the R5. I did a comparison, and my setup with an R5 would have shift points virtually identical to your wagon. I think less than 3mph difference. Like I said earlier, I really like the ratios in the R5. That low first gear makes 4-wheeling a little easier than the 2.78 too.

-Scouder
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 08:24 PM
  #19  
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Club FTE Silver Member

As a last resort, maybe a call to Richmond and talk to them about actual torque rating of the new 5 spd. The Richmond IS basically a Doug Nash(they bought them out). The new Richmonds have roller bearing gears on them, the old Nash stuff is brass bushing. From what I have seen, all basic parts are interchangeable

I used a Ford bearing retainer on the front of my Nash. Bolt pattern is the same. It allows me to use the 1 5/16"-18 Hemi spline input(std race Nash) and the Ford big input bearing. You'll be able to order up Ford spline, but back then it was all Hemi spline.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 09:15 PM
  #20  
ceetwarrior's Avatar
ceetwarrior
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 14
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Scouder
Freightrain,

I love the look of the ratio set in the Richmond. But I was worried about strength. You think its good enough?

-Scouder
Scouder, what about a NV4500? You still get a very deep granny gear for 4 wheeling, and 4 other streetable forward gears... and it's from a Ram w/ Cummins diesel so you know it's strong....
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 09:47 PM
  #21  
Scouder's Avatar
Scouder
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
From: Evanston, WY
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by ceetwarrior
Scouder, what about a NV4500? You still get a very deep granny gear for 4 wheeling, and 4 other streetable forward gears... and it's from a Ram w/ Cummins diesel so you know it's strong....
The NV4500 was one of the first trannys I thought of, mainly because they are in the junkyards. After researching, I found they are basically a 5-speed equivalent of the NP435 I have now. The 5th gear is stacked on top, as an overdrive. This would be cool for highway driving, but it leaves me with a gearset almost identical to what I have now for 1-4. Although that granny low first gear is the nutz for wheeling, it leaves me with 2,3 and 4 for performance driving. Since 2nd is also quite low, it makes a pretty big drop into 3rd and again into 4th, pulling my engine out of it's powerband by around 1000rpm. The other problem is that it weighs 200lbs. That's not typically a concern in a 4x4 for sure, but I have this one on a diet. I want it to weigh in at 4600ish when I "complete" it. Then I'll go back through it over time and try to trim out another 3-400lbs. My wet dream number is 4000lbs, but with 2 Dana 60's and big tires that might be a stretch.

I will be dropping my 5.38's in both ends as soon as I am done with the rollcage, and based on how it performs I will make a final decision on the ratios I need. It's gonna take some seat-of-the-pants input.

-Scouder
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 11:51 PM
  #22  
ceetwarrior's Avatar
ceetwarrior
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 14
From: Colorado
Scouder, good research. To me, it seems that 2nd to 3rd is fine, but 3rd to 4th is a pretty big drop. I gotta really scream mine to make it not drop too bad when I hit 4th.

Yeah, 200lbs, the beast is heavy but man it is beefy yet compact.

Man, 5:38, that is LOW!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scouder
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
17
Oct 27, 2005 10:28 PM
Scouder
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
17
Feb 21, 2005 10:25 PM
Scouder
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
29
Nov 29, 2004 05:54 PM
Scouder
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
20
Aug 20, 2004 07:48 PM
Scouder
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
14
Apr 12, 2004 04:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE