Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Too Cold?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #16  
tex94F250's Avatar
tex94F250
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: N. Gwinnett Co. Georgia
As to the original post. If you can see that difference when your thermostat opens, it is quote likely that you are okay. The gauge is not absolute. My temp gauge runs at the bar before the N in NORMAL and I run a 160° thermostat. In the south, pulling a 26' gooseneck you need all the help you can get. I can see when the stat opens and as I am getting 12 mpg pretty regularly in the 460, I am happy. Is the heater hot? Are the heater hoses to the firewall hot to the touch? I understand the need for the best MPG possible with the price of fuel. What kind of mileage are you getting? Is there some reason you feel like the mileage has deteriorated?
Tex
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #17  
crockpot's Avatar
crockpot
New User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bwarhurst
I am experiencing similar problems but I am trying to find the location of the temperature sending unit? Is it different or seperate from the coolant temperature sensor?

Thanks
The electric temp gauge sending unit location:
Looking at the motor from the front bumper. Notice the location of the distributer. Imagine you are looking at the distributor from straight above it. (view from the top). The temp gauge sending unit is about 3 inches from center of dist. cap at the 2 o'clock position. It has one wire leading to it with a small 90 degree boot over the connector.
The coolant temp sensor IS separate/differant and is a taller "tree type" affair to the left of the distributor about 8" at about 9:30 position.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 10:18 PM
  #18  
wcmo sae's Avatar
wcmo sae
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: New Haven, MO
Last time I checked, I was getting 12 mpg, which I guess isn't too bad for an F-250 351. Of course that was before I had a new, much less restrictive exhaust put on, and I've had a few other things done to it, too, but it actually seems like I have to fill the truck up more often now than before. I'm sure there are other reasons for the crappy mileage (like the 3.55 gears), but right now I'm looking for anything I can do to improve mileage until I can afford more expensive changes.........
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 08:31 AM
  #19  
crockpot's Avatar
crockpot
New User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by wcmo sae
Last time I checked, I was getting 12 mpg, which I guess isn't too bad for an F-250 351.I'm looking for anything I can do to improve mileage until I can afford more expensive changes.........
Trying to get better mileage I've found that a low restriction cat-back exhaust system does NOT help at all. The major impediment to free flowing exhaust are the catylitic converters. Low restriction converters are NOT cost effective either. Low restriction air filter systems (read K&N FIPK) will NOT do anything to help improve mileage.
Have the engine tuned to an optimum condition, plugs with less than 30K on them, plug wires in good shape, ignition coil with less than 50K, and good dist. cap with a decent rotor.
The VERY best way to improve the gas mileage is to use 4 tires that have a highway type tread pattern in an effort to decrease rolling resistance. Aggressive, heavy lugged tread patterns have a HIGH rolling resistance (like snow tires).

With highway tires, engine tuned properly and my 302 4x4 5 spd stick in a stock condition I got a carefully measured 17.2 mpg on the highway at 59mph.
I added a K&N FIPK system, a Summit Racing Low Restriction dual cat-back exhaust and new shocks all 'round. Removed the belt driven radiator fan and installed an electric fan from a Crown Vic Police car and put on a fresh coat of wax.
Tested for gas mileage again in approximately the same weather, over the same highway, at 59mph, using the same brand of gas from the same pump and measured 17.2. Mildly dissapointed as it showed no mileage improvement.
A week later I had heavy lugged, winter type tires mounted on my other 4 wheels. With the winter tires on I drove the same test circuit under the same conditions as the first 2 tests and measured 15.1 mpg.

So as far as making expensive changes in an effort to improve mileage--- SAVE your money. Nothing will help until catylitic converters are eliminated and the manufacturers can reset valve timing and the ECM's for maximum fuel mileage. And we are pretty sure that is not going to happen.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #20  
crockpot's Avatar
crockpot
New User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
[QUOTE=wcmo sae] I'm sure there are other reasons for the crappy mileage ( QUOTE]

Another way to improve your fuel mileage. Take off your mud flaps and running boards. I speak from experience.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 05:32 AM
  #21  
moose94's Avatar
moose94
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Quispamsis, N.B, Canada
Fuel Milage? LOL. Crockpot man you are funny. Doing a careful 59 MPH...you got 17MPG? lol. If you are that worried about your gas milage buy a saturn or a civic. I don't really care personally. I certainly don't go out and try to calculate wind speeds and aerodynamacy of my p/u. But you are right in a way saying that cats do nothing for milage. They don't. They muffle sound and support emissions.
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #22  
crockpot's Avatar
crockpot
New User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Not that I'm "worried" about gas mileage it's just that keeping tabs on mileage is an indicator of the general state of health of the engine and the peripherals. I also installed a vacuum gauge for even a more immediate indicator of actually what is going on under the bonnet.
If I were "concerned" about getting high gas mileage I wouldn't own a full size 4wd p/u that is able to haul around my camper when I'm on a hunting trip.
I set the cruise control at 59 and I leave early enough to get where I want to go in plenty of time. If I had a small v8 that got less than 16 mpg I would say there was something wrong either mechanically or with my driving habits.
If everyone would do their best to acheive maximum mileage with their vehicle then, maybe, we wouldn't have to import so much crude from the arabs.
 
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #23  
moose94's Avatar
moose94
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Quispamsis, N.B, Canada
You get 16mpg thru your 302? That's wack. You must drive like an old man. lol. Kidding. No that's cool for you. But my headers are being installed right now and when I get the truck back I am going to want to open it up. Which means...tears....bad gas milage.... not too worried. Do you ever come onto your truck to burn the carbon out??
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #24  
wickymustang's Avatar
wickymustang
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Putting mudflaps and running boards on your truck doesn't change your milage at all. Of the 5 trucks my dad has had in the last 40 years, he has never lost any mpg by adding mudflaps or running boards. On his 88 F150 he put on running boards that doubled as mudflaps for the front tires and added some nice metal ones for the rear. His mpg held constant and if I remember right, with the tires inflated properly it actually went up.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:45 AM
  #25  
tex94F250's Avatar
tex94F250
Posting Guru
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: N. Gwinnett Co. Georgia
wcmo,
Did we actually address your concern that your engine was running too cold? Have you gotten anywhere with a diagnosis? Just checking.
Tex
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #26  
Highguy's Avatar
Highguy
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
I was impressed with my Bronco's gas milage. Ive owned numerous V8s and none have been as good as the Bronco.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #27  
Oregon F-250's Avatar
Oregon F-250
New User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Crockpot

I am curious about your experience with better mileage without mudflaps and running boards. I am doubtful.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mr. Crab
2007 - 2014 Expedition & Navigator
1
Mar 13, 2015 09:56 AM
littlejohn6977
Excursion - King of SUVs
2
Feb 7, 2009 10:45 PM
ghunt
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
28
Dec 12, 2008 08:47 PM
dagren99
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
7
Jan 15, 2008 06:11 PM
Skagit
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
5
Aug 12, 2003 10:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE